F-Pace (X761) / C-X17 2016 - Onwards

Cx17

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-25-2014, 10:13 PM
desertchimera's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 190
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Cx17

2015 Jaguar SUV...... Drooling
 

Last edited by Cambo; 03-26-2014 at 03:14 AM. Reason: Fixed video
  #2  
Old 03-26-2014, 02:54 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Man that's ugly.
 
  #3  
Old 03-26-2014, 07:48 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,530
Received 4,274 Likes on 2,811 Posts
Default

I don't find it ugly, but if I needed an SUV I would stick with a Jeep or a Subaru....
 
  #4  
Old 03-26-2014, 08:17 AM
pab's Avatar
pab
pab is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,766
Received 240 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

>if I needed an SUV I would stick with a Jeep or a Subaru....

Why, since I'm sure it's a Land/Range Rover under the skin. Expensive stuff, true, but the L/R Rover folks know how to build an SUV.

The real question is since Tata has L/R Rover why dilute the combined brand with another vehicle? It would seem to make more sense for them to coordinate brands and have both cross-selling the other (i.e., Jaguar guy wants an SUV and Jaguar dealer "facilitates" sale of L/R Rover; L/R Rover owner wants a summer car for the beach house and L/R Rover dealer "facilitates" the purchase of an F-Type).
================================================
Jaguar - it's not an automobile, it's a Motorcar
 
  #5  
Old 03-26-2014, 08:23 AM
GGG's Avatar
GGG
GGG is online now
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Durham, UK
Posts: 120,444
Received 16,794 Likes on 12,165 Posts
Default

The JAGUAR SUV doesn't appeal to me but I'm looking forward to the release of the LAND ROVER Coupe to replace the XK.

Graham
 
  #6  
Old 03-26-2014, 03:26 PM
desertchimera's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 190
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

It's design to compete with the Lamborghini and maserati SUV. I thinks it's pretty neat but not functional. Land rover doesn't have anything to worry about because they are more family oriented. The cost in US dollars is 49000 or £30000 from what I have read and it's for the 20-30 yr old niches. I love the futuristic electronics and lighting. I am sure they will change things as it's hits production and gets feedback from the car shows. It's a crossover but I don't think anyone in their right mind would take any of those that I mention and take them off-roading like you would a land rover that has proven itself in many countries
 
  #7  
Old 03-26-2014, 05:56 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GGG
The JAGUAR SUV doesn't appeal to me but I'm looking forward to the release of the LAND ROVER Coupe to replace the XK.

Graham
C'mon Graham, I made that joke months ago!

It's pretty obvious who the target demographic for the CX17 is; my wife (who just got a Freelander 2) saw the CX-17 in a Jaguar magazine & announced, without prompting "wow that's cool, i'd drive that"

I tried very hard to get her into a Range Rover or a Land Rover, but it wasn't easy, and there were some very convincing arguments from her.

Defender - Are you crazy? I'm not a farmer!
Full Fat Range Rover - It's too big!
Range Rover Sport - It's too big!
Range Rover Evoque - Ugly, looks like a Stormtrooper helmet, wasn't it designed by Victoria Beckham?
Discovery - Way too big and damn ugly, looks like a box!
Freelander 2 - I like it, it's not so big & ugly like the others.

And then the CX-17 - It's a Jag, oh wow, I like it.

The X-Type Sportwagon & XF Sportbrake weren't/aren't sold in Australia (long story) but in any case the answer is "no way am I driving a station wagon"

So there you have it, the CX-17 is the car that women want when they don't want an Evoque.

I kind of get the Stormtrooper helmet bit...





But they also remind me of Marvin the Paranoid Android





But getting back on topic, the CX-17 will sell, just not to the traditional Jag customers....
 
Attached Thumbnails Cx17-evoque1.jpg   Cx17-evoque2.jpg   Cx17-evoque3.jpg   Cx17-evoque4.jpg  

Trending Topics

  #8  
Old 03-26-2014, 08:28 PM
desertchimera's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 190
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

The same body style is out there right now from Nissan to Ford.....most drivers of these crossovers are women or what is called the CEO moms, those that make home decisions from shopping to finances.

Regardless if you like it or not, it's going to sell, and the amenities and futuristic look is a breath of fresh air, when the s type came out, I heard things like it's to stuffy and fake looking plastic interior on the earlier models, it looks like a ford interior. The status quo throughout the world demands SUVs or crossovers. Wonder if they will make a jaguar mini van lol.....

$41,675 Starting MSRP1
$366/mo 36 months lease
$5268 due at signing
*Security deposit waived
Prices for Mar 26, 2014
and ZIP
EPA-Est. MPG
City/Hwy 2 16/22
Search Dealer Inventory
Request a Local Quote
Estimate Your Payment
Compare to Other Models

Ford sport

If the jaguar cx17 price is correct, I would go with it instead of the ford I posted

Specs
Engine: 3.0-litre S/C V6
Transmission: 8-spd auto, four-wheel drive
0-62mph: 6.0 seconds (est)
Top speed: 155mph
Economy: 35mpg (est)
CO2: 199g/km

2015 Jaguar C-X17 SUV price and release date
The expected price is £30,000 while this model on the market appear at the beginning of 2015.

30,000.00 Pounds Sterling equals
49,728.15 US Dollars

1 GBP equals 1.66 USD · MSN Money

Maserati Kubang SUV revealed in Frankfurt [videos]http://youtu.be/RhmIFlohHIw

2014 Lamborghini Urus SUV official Photos - Live pictures 2013 2015 concept prototype - YouTube

2014 Porsche Cayenne - Luxury SUV | 5 Reasons To Buy | AutoTrader.com - YouTube
 
Attached Images   

Last edited by Cambo; 03-26-2014 at 09:45 PM.
  #9  
Old 03-28-2014, 03:43 AM
Richard Moss's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 158
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

It's a smart move for Jaguar and I'm sure that it will be a great success. I quite like it but (as with all modern cars) I like it less than I like older vehicles
 
  #10  
Old 06-16-2014, 08:15 AM
John Fox's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 476
Received 78 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

I think I will like the production model better since this is a dressed up show piece. That being said the wife loves the look of it and given Im looking for my next Jag (car for me) so she can transition into my Range Rover I think she will like it even more given the RR is a full size HSE. Plus knowing her (very frugal Asian) the gas mileage will be the selling factor. In the end whatever I have to do to keep her from a Benz I will ( I don't agree they are the greatest vehicles ever made), LOL. Thankfully I have some time and she wont want a new one, LOL, hates that first year depreciation.
 
  #11  
Old 09-25-2014, 07:49 PM
alexg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Anselmo
Posts: 707
Received 102 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

What is the US release date? Any news on this?
 
  #12  
Old 11-17-2014, 10:13 AM
Dino V's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 98
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Not bad, definitely think this car has potential.
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.