Boring out the Throttle Body
#21
#25
The price is more than reasonable for the amount of work performed. Question regarding additional services: are there any apparent benefits of TB shaft machining? Would that affect fatiguing over a period of time with a larger butterfly installed? What sorts of power gains can we expect from TB boring of the existing TB?
#26
I thought about the getting the shaft machined, but unless you are going full race it most likely wouldn't be noticed. Plus I worry that it might break. From looking at dynos on various forums, anywhere from 2-6 across the range. More if you have other mods, but for the price point and the fact the STR is currently in pieces, I figured why not.
The following users liked this post:
Tirefriar (05-03-2013)
#27
I thought about the getting the shaft machined, but unless you are going full race it most likely wouldn't be noticed. Plus I worry that it might break. From looking at dynos on various forums, anywhere from 2-6 across the range. More if you have other mods, but for the price point and the fact the STR is currently in pieces, I figured why not.
You can't beat the price. Plus I'd think the real benefit would be in the throttle response.
The following 2 users liked this post by Michael Star:
User 070620 (11-24-2015),
WaterDragon (05-20-2013)
#29
It does look as if he bored it as much as he safely could, but yeah...3mm is not that much. Better than nothing, but not that much better.
The XJs must have a much thicker wall as mine went from 75 to 82.5 mm
It is good that you posted, even with less than ideal results, because at least now everyone knows what to expect when thinking about doing this. So it does help the board community.
The XJs must have a much thicker wall as mine went from 75 to 82.5 mm
It is good that you posted, even with less than ideal results, because at least now everyone knows what to expect when thinking about doing this. So it does help the board community.
#31
AND...You have a shiny new butterfly!
It was a bottleneck, so +9.5% will help some.
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (02-02-2018)
#34
Good that ET is trying this, when I checked with Maxbore for doing it that way, he said he didn't want to do this as the bearings would become to short in his opinion.
Imho its overkill as well for an eaton setup, a 82.5mm for a AJ26 engine (which you refer to), will already flow enough, and that's only $100 or so with Maxbore, you can better spend the other $750 on other items.
Imho its overkill as well for an eaton setup, a 82.5mm for a AJ26 engine (which you refer to), will already flow enough, and that's only $100 or so with Maxbore, you can better spend the other $750 on other items.
#36
#38
#40
A few fun facts for comparison of my current system:
ORIGINAL & -----> NOW
75mm/2.95" ------> 92 mm MAF is 3.6"
75mm -------> intake tube is 4" then down to 3.5"
75mm -------> 82.5mm TB is 3.25"
75mm -------> port matched elbow is the equivalent of 3.25" as is the entrance to my Gen V Eaton.
ORIGINAL & -----> NOW
75mm/2.95" ------> 92 mm MAF is 3.6"
75mm -------> intake tube is 4" then down to 3.5"
75mm -------> 82.5mm TB is 3.25"
75mm -------> port matched elbow is the equivalent of 3.25" as is the entrance to my Gen V Eaton.
Last edited by WaterDragon; 06-11-2013 at 08:46 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Baloo (06-11-2013)