XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

1992 v12 free up hp

  #1  
Old 10-26-2016, 01:10 AM
revski666's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: pa
Posts: 103
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default 1992 v12 free up hp

hey guys i have a 1992 xjs V12 if i pull off all my catalytic convertes how much horsepower would i free up? and would their be any warning lights pop up on my dash
 
  #2  
Old 10-26-2016, 02:46 AM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

US cars from what I have seen have a catalytic element in the downpipes. Lost of people remove this from all 4 pipes.

If your Cats are working properly and not blocked removing them (Not the ones in the PIPES) will have very little difference on a stock engine.

To increase the power on the 5.3L there is a couple of things you can do.

Remove the Cat elements in the downpipes.
Increase the size of the trumpets on the air filter boxes
Fit a cold air intake, this can be over the radiator like the TWR cars.
Fit K&N filter elements.

Here is a pic of what TWR did for CIA on the XJS. You can just see it in the bottom right of the pic.

.
 
Attached Thumbnails 1992 v12 free up hp-twr-intake.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (10-26-2016)
  #3  
Old 10-26-2016, 06:25 PM
JigJag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,331
Received 580 Likes on 361 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
US cars from what I have seen have a catalytic element in the downpipes. Lost of people remove this from all 4 pipes.

If your Cats are working properly and not blocked removing them (Not the ones in the PIPES) will have very little difference on a stock engine.
.
Warrjon,

I've read the published specs for the US catted 5.3 is 30hp lower than the same model in EU config ( no cats ). Was that incorrect?
 
  #4  
Old 10-26-2016, 09:26 PM
Mish_Mish's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 883
Received 169 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

EU model had different valve clearance and compression ratio of 12.5:1, instead of 11:1 for US model. I removed all cats on my '82 HE and gained better power, but only because my lower cats were half melted. That power increase also came at a cost of awful fuel consumption, due to lack of back pressure. Right now I plan installing generic converters in place of the empty lower units. Also I will do what Warren suggested above, for noticeable power gain.
 
  #5  
Old 10-26-2016, 09:35 PM
sidescrollin's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Key West, FL
Posts: 2,456
Received 693 Likes on 562 Posts
Default

Isn't it more likely that your bad fuel mileage is from poor fuel/air ratios since your lambda sensors are reading nothing?
 
  #6  
Old 10-27-2016, 12:28 AM
revski666's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: pa
Posts: 103
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

SWEET so iF i pull all of my cats off, i will get 30 HP? but will i get any check engine lights on my dash
 
  #7  
Old 10-27-2016, 02:28 AM
Daim's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 5,907
Received 2,180 Likes on 1,583 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JigJag
Warrjon,

I've read the published specs for the US catted 5.3 is 30hp lower than the same model in EU config ( no cats ). Was that incorrect?
My cat- and lambdasond-free 89 has according to its papers 295 bhp which would result in 302 ps. Just a 'TMYK' fact...

Models with cats had around 268 hp (272 ps) here in Germany (mine is a UK import).
 
  #8  
Old 10-27-2016, 02:31 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,328
Received 9,076 Likes on 5,344 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JigJag
Warrjon,

I've read the published specs for the US catted 5.3 is 30hp lower than the same model in EU config ( no cats ). Was that incorrect?

It is correct, at least for pre facelift V12s anyway. The US version has a lower compression ratio and cats, etc.


Greg
 
  #9  
Old 10-27-2016, 02:33 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,328
Received 9,076 Likes on 5,344 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by revski666
SWEET so iF i pull all of my cats off, i will get 30 HP? but will i get any check engine lights on my dash
No, as Warrjon explained, that will not do much. You need induction changes as well as the European spec compression ratio.


Greg
 
The following users liked this post:
warrjon (10-27-2016)
  #10  
Old 10-27-2016, 03:39 AM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by revski666
SWEET so iF i pull all of my cats off, i will get 30 HP? but will i get any check engine lights on my dash
An engine needs air to create power, fuel is then added to make correct AFR. Around 12 to 13:1 for power (max torque) in a NA car and 14.7 to 15:1 for cruising leaner if the engine is resistant to detonation.

Just removing the Cats will result in very small power gains. To take advantage of the free flowing exhaust you need to get more air (actually OXYGEN) into the engine.

EU and Aussie spec cars had higher CR due to the higher octane fuel available in those markets, this makes a HUGE difference as the additional Quench acts to cool the charge as it's Squished helping to reduce detonation.

Originally Posted by Daim
My cat- and lambdasond-free 89 has according to its papers 295 bhp which would result in 302 ps. Just a 'TMYK' fact...

Models with cats had around 268 hp (272 ps) here in Germany (mine is a UK import).
My Australian spec 1989 with O2 sensors and Cats is listed at 213kW (284hp). TWR managed another 30hp from the 5.3L with CAI, larger intake trumpets, K&N Filter and free flowing exhaust.

As far as I can tell all Jaguar did to adjust the CR for markets was to change the head gasket thickness. The parts catalog lists a couple of different part numbers.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by warrjon:
Greg in France (10-27-2016), Jonathan-W (10-27-2016)
  #11  
Old 10-27-2016, 05:09 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,328
Received 9,076 Likes on 5,344 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
As far as I can tell all Jaguar did to adjust the CR for markets was to change the head gasket thickness. The parts catalog lists a couple of different part numbers.
I have often wondered and asked people, but nobody seemed to know. This seems a very sensible way to do it, can anyone 100% verify? I have a friend who wants to up his CR from US spec to UK.
Greg
 
  #12  
Old 10-27-2016, 06:51 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,735
Received 10,741 Likes on 7,097 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by warrjon
As far as I can tell all Jaguar did to adjust the CR for markets was to change the head gasket thickness. The parts catalog lists a couple of different part numbers.

Different pistons!


Cheers
DD
 
The following users liked this post:
ronbros (11-04-2016)
  #13  
Old 10-27-2016, 06:57 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,328
Received 9,076 Likes on 5,344 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
Different pistons!

Is that definite, Doug? excuse my asking.
Greg
 
The following users liked this post:
Jonathan-W (10-27-2016)
  #14  
Old 10-27-2016, 11:08 AM
Jonathan-W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pensacola Florida USA
Posts: 1,858
Received 366 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

What happened to that 5 degree advance?


https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...ssible-128515/
 
  #15  
Old 10-27-2016, 03:38 PM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

Doug is right there is standard and high compression pistons listed for the HE.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by warrjon:
Greg in France (10-28-2016), Jonathan-W (10-28-2016)
  #16  
Old 10-28-2016, 09:25 AM
Jonathan-W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pensacola Florida USA
Posts: 1,858
Received 366 Likes on 294 Posts
Default


only saw standard for my 5.3... jaguar-sport high and low...


oh any one need the standard VE numbers for the 5.3
 

Last edited by Jonathan-W; 10-28-2016 at 09:31 AM.
  #17  
Old 10-28-2016, 02:41 PM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,328
Received 9,076 Likes on 5,344 Posts
Default

No point in going above 5,500 RPM then! Where did you get these figures, Jonathan? Are they for the USA spec engine?
greg
 
  #18  
Old 10-28-2016, 07:04 PM
JigJag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,331
Received 580 Likes on 361 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greg in France
No point in going above 5,500 RPM then! Where did you get these figures, Jonathan? Are they for the USA spec engine?
greg
This makes those big throttle bodies look WAY more attractive!
 
  #19  
Old 10-29-2016, 03:17 AM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JigJag
This makes those big throttle bodies look WAY more attractive!
The stock throttle bodies flow 600fcm EACH, putting bigger ones on is a total waste of time.

My 6.7L will run stock TB's with just a profile on the inlet and velocity stack.
 
  #20  
Old 10-29-2016, 06:05 AM
JLBolen's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greenwood, AR
Posts: 159
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Kirby Palms book has a section talking about increasing the airflow, minor modifications to the air filter housings and milling a radius on the throttle body outer side to smooth the flow.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.