MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

early tappet / cam covers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 03:12 AM
  #1  
58mk1x2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 92
Likes: 19
From: running creek qld australia
Default early tappet / cam covers





I got these covers with some parts can some one tell me what model they are off.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 12:10 PM
  #2  
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 805
From: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Default

In the photo I see the thermostatic switch _ like mine. I have 340 and that switch was also used in the 3.8s.
Just sort of guessing here though.
Does it matter what they're off of, I thought that the covers were all the same for the 2.4, 3,4 and 3.8 litre models.
I know the later covers were not polished aluminum, but had ridges in them, painted black.
Later type, also found on the 340.


Sophomore Slumps: The Series 2 Jaguar E-Type ? Spannerhead


Edit :


Just had a look at mine and the nuts on the front of your covers are missing, Hmmm.
On the carburetor side of the block; what does the displacement say ?
 

Last edited by JeffR1; Jan 1, 2015 at 12:39 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2015 | 05:21 AM
  #3  
58mk1x2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 92
Likes: 19
From: running creek qld australia
Default

hi jeff, its a 3.4, I was told it could be a early xk120 with out the bolts at the front of the cover.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2015 | 03:31 PM
  #4  
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 2,553
From: Crewe, England
Default

Very early XK engines didn't have the front studs for the cam covers. However, Jaguar rapidly changed to additional securing studs at the front as the covers leaked like mad after only a short mileage, and owners complained. The changeover was in the very early 50s, so the engine in the photos could have been a 3.4 litre from an XK120, as stated earlier in the thread. The Mark V saloon made at the same time never had the XK engine, the Mark VII was the first in 1951. I can't find out when the changeover to front studs was made, so some Mark VIIs could have had the earlier cylinder heads.
 

Last edited by Fraser Mitchell; Jan 3, 2015 at 03:35 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2015 | 05:45 PM
  #5  
58mk1x2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 92
Likes: 19
From: running creek qld australia
Default

thanks fraser the engine number is a early mk7 @ 7 to 1 comp but I didn't know if they were off that engine to start with as it is also fitted with a mk1 or 2 sump.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2015 | 02:35 PM
  #6  
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 2,553
From: Crewe, England
Default

Actually, I was wrong on the intro year for the Mark VII. It was October 1950 because I had a look at a book by Brooklands Books I was very recently given, titled "Jaguar Cars 1948-1951". It consists of a collection of magazine articles of that time, UK and US. Autocar has a picture in its Oct 20 1950 issue showing the Mark VII with a "ghost" drawing of the mechanical layout, and two photos of the car, plus a photo of the XK engine, and that engine has no front studs on the camcovers. The magazine Motor also has an article dated Oct 18 1950 providing a lot of details on the car, plus photos, but none of the engine separately. So it seems the front-studded camcovers may have been introduced in 1951 or 1952. The Mark VII was for export only for quite a while.

The 1950 price is interesting - £988, with UK Purchase Tax of £278, quite a whack of tax !!
 

Last edited by Fraser Mitchell; Jan 5, 2015 at 03:13 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dickie_L_J_O
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
8
Sep 13, 2015 07:44 AM
jagent
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
8
Sep 12, 2015 09:10 AM
jaggermang
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
9
Sep 8, 2015 07:07 PM
kstevusa
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
0
Sep 7, 2015 01:12 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.