Reasons to Lump A XJS Convertible - Jaguar Forums - Jaguar Enthusiasts Forum


Other Jaguar Models / Concepts / Replicas Do you have a Jaguar model not listed above? This is the place to talk about it!

Reasons to Lump A XJS Convertible

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-19-2018, 07:32 PM
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: norfolk, va
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Reasons to Lump A XJS Convertible

What reasons do some XJ-S, XJS owners would 'lump' their vehicles? Hete are a few of mine.

Engine Performance
Vehicle is slow. I understand the car is a grand tourer, but it has no acceleration off the line. It cannot get out of it's own way. Once you get up to
60 mph and up it is a smooth vehicle. (I have the 4.0 AJ16.) A 6 cyl engine for a 4,022 lb car was not a good choice. I drove a 6.0 V12 twice, a better choice provided you take care of it to keep the jaguar gremlins at bay.

2. Realibility
I really cannot say these vehicles are unrealiable. I had my vehicle for 14 years and the only issues I had were replacing the LR wheel bearing carrier, the ECU, and ignition coils. But I have heard about many stories about jaguars not being reliable.

3. Parts availibility
Parts are hard to find and when found most are used. There is no aftermarket for this vehicle. A lot of parts are virtually extinct.

4.Difficult Repairs
These vehicles can be difficult to repair. When you have driveibility issues (ie if TPS goes bad) it cannot be readjusted if one does not have access to jaguar franchised diagnostic equipment. Jaguar dealwrships won't touch these vehicles. There are no businesses to refurbish your ECU it it goes bad.

These are a few if my reasons. When my engine, tramsmission, ECU goes tango uniform, I'm converting to a LS V8 engine. These vehicles are too beautiful to go to waste b/c of parts availibity, lack of proper diagnostic equipment when there are suitable, realiable, readily available engine, transmission parts out there to keep these cars on the road. Let the flames begin.

Last edited by lonejag; 05-19-2018 at 07:45 PM. Reason: Left out info
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2018, 04:15 PM
enderle's Avatar
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 1,802
Thanked 364 Times in 268 Posts
Default

That's pretty much it. The 12s in particular are nasty to keep up. You can drop an LS in one though and turn it into a really nice driver. Unlike the E-Type the XJS doesn't have much resale value so you aren't really destroying a classic (says the guy with the XKE with a 327 in it, hey but I bought it that way).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2018, 04:27 PM
NBCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Newport Beach, California
Posts: 2,955
Thanked 899 Times in 737 Posts
Default

Perhaps it may be less costly and easier to simply sell the XJS and purchase a GM car with one of their pushrod engines already installed.



As far as reliability, I'm not sure a Chevrolet/GM engine is more reliable than the AJ16. I personally have never been impressed with General Motors products as a whole, nor their reliability record in general.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2018, 08:17 PM
Rivguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SF bay Area
Posts: 540
Thanked 192 Times in 134 Posts
Default

Lone Jag, It sounds like your like your stock engine equipped car is currently running fine. I would continue to enjoy it until something really serious happens then I would weigh my options. In California there are always potential problems with smog compliance in engine swaps. It seems that the V12 usually stops running due to ancillary system failures. I wonder if anyone has actually worn one out. My '89 has a bit over 100,000 miles on it. I haven't put many miles on it while I work on it. It hasn't been completely re-commisioned but I can drive it occasionally. I would prefer to keep the original motor, as it's so much of the character of the car.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
POLL: You MUST lump your XJS V12 Flint Ironstag XJS ( X27 ) 39 09-20-2017 02:38 PM
To Lump, or Not to Lump? scatcat Off Topic 16 03-24-2017 02:04 AM
Lump isnt very Lump. gorillainsd XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III 12 04-11-2016 09:41 AM
To Lump or not to Lump lonejag XJS ( X27 ) 36 04-02-2016 08:10 PM
1982 XJS Jaguar lump for sale matjohns PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds 2 01-15-2012 01:05 PM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 PM.


JAGUAR and its logo are the registered trademarks of Jaguar Cars Limited. Jaguar Cars Limited is not affiliated with JaguarForums.com.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: