XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

RESULTS ARE IN - 1/4 mile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-20-2017, 07:22 AM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,899
Received 1,538 Likes on 889 Posts
Default RESULTS ARE IN - 1/4 mile

Happy to announce 3 offical runs at.WSID all were consistent 13.7 e.t

I have no doubt with 3.58 diff gears and opening up the headers (better flow) I can get this down to 13.4/13.5
 
Attached Thumbnails RESULTS ARE IN - 1/4 mile-img_20170920_203815.jpg   RESULTS ARE IN - 1/4 mile-img_20170920_203828_burst001_cover.jpg  

Last edited by steve_k_xk; 09-20-2017 at 07:56 AM.
The following 6 users liked this post by steve_k_xk:
Datsports (09-24-2017), guy (09-26-2017), mosesbotbol (09-20-2017), Panthro (10-11-2017), Ranchero50 (09-20-2017), winstonsalemncxk (09-20-2017) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
  #2  
Old 09-20-2017, 08:06 AM
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 6,269
Received 1,197 Likes on 931 Posts
Default

Sounds like those mods are going to be expensive for not much gain, no? Could you gain more with different tires?
 
  #3  
Old 09-20-2017, 08:11 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

Well its already pulling some impressive results for a naturally aspirated 4.2 XK...

To go from stock 14.5 @ 96mph to 13.7 @ 101mph with just cats, exhaust and tune, it's now getting to the expensive end of town...
 
The following 3 users liked this post by Cambo:
Datsports (09-24-2017), mosesbotbol (09-20-2017), steve_k_xk (09-20-2017)
  #4  
Old 09-20-2017, 08:14 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mosesbotbol
Sounds like those mods are going to be expensive for not much gain, no? Could you gain more with different tires?
60ft times were pretty consistent 2.0's, traction didn't seem to be too big an issue, my XJR with the Quaife in it does the same 2.0 60ft times consistently.
 
The following users liked this post:
steve_k_xk (09-20-2017)
  #5  
Old 09-20-2017, 09:51 AM
Ranchero50's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 2,936
Received 969 Likes on 654 Posts
Default

I thought the ECU fought different gears. Impressive numbers for a NA car.

I'd probably redo the intake tract from air filter to throttle body and see if there's anything there. Otherwise, car diet time.
 
  #6  
Old 09-20-2017, 02:27 PM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,899
Received 1,538 Likes on 889 Posts
Default

Thanks Ranch

Unsure how much I could gain out of intake systen they don't seem to be too restrictive and flow nicely .

Throttle body - maxbore are willing to upgrade 75mms to 78mm.. not really worth it

Diet time yes !!
There isn't a huge amount I can do however I was thinking lighter wheels and shedding the large style rear muffler would help .
 
  #7  
Old 09-20-2017, 04:18 PM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,633
Received 5,159 Likes on 3,090 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk
....Throttle body - maxbore are willing to upgrade 75mms to 78mm.. not really worth it ....
226 square mm Vs. 245 square mm is almost ten percent more flow. But, would the rest of the system be able to use it?
 
  #8  
Old 09-20-2017, 06:01 PM
jagtoes's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 5,209
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,231 Posts
Default

So has anyone tried to put a turbo on one of these cars.
 
  #9  
Old 09-20-2017, 06:14 PM
Ranchero50's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 2,936
Received 969 Likes on 654 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jagtoes
So has anyone tried to put a turbo on one of these cars.
It would be better IMHO to install an Eaton. Oh wait...
 
  #10  
Old 09-20-2017, 06:26 PM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,899
Received 1,538 Likes on 889 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jagtoes
So has anyone tried to put a turbo on one of these cars.
Jag toes I have thought about turbo charging but in honesty if going down that path you are better off starting with a s/c short block and using that as you build up
 
  #11  
Old 09-20-2017, 06:30 PM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,899
Received 1,538 Likes on 889 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cee Jay
226 square mm Vs. 245 square mm is almost ten percent more flow. But, would the rest of the system be able to use it?
When you look at it that way it does sound a little more impressive.

See how the diff and header/manifold project go first and put this back up on my maybe list
 
  #12  
Old 09-23-2017, 04:31 AM
u102768's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,941
Received 1,484 Likes on 907 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo
60ft times were pretty consistent 2.0's, traction didn't seem to be too big an issue, my XJR with the Quaife in it does the same 2.0 60ft times consistently.
That was my weak point last time so, as I am hoping to get back to the track soon, what is the best setup for a clean launch for those of us without an LSD?

DSC, TRAC-DSC or no DSC?

Raise the revs while holding the car on the brake pedal or just boot it when the lights go green?

Foot flat to the floor or ease the revs in gently?

Let down the tyres or run at the normal pressure?

Any other tips?
 
  #13  
Old 09-23-2017, 05:27 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

Well, I ran my XKR on the same night as Steve.

DSC off completely, big smokey burnout to warm up the tyres, boot it on the last yellow.

Actually launched OK, even without the LSD, I also did a couple of 2.0 60ft's, a 1.9x once too.

Mind you I had brand new Michelin Pilot Sport 4S 295's on the back, which would have also helped.

Tyres are very important for traction...
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Cambo:
Datsports (09-26-2017), u102768 (09-23-2017)
  #14  
Old 09-23-2017, 05:46 AM
Ranchero50's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 2,936
Received 969 Likes on 654 Posts
Default

I launch right off idle and let the tires shock the suspension.
 
The following users liked this post:
u102768 (09-23-2017)
  #15  
Old 09-23-2017, 04:09 PM
u102768's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,941
Received 1,484 Likes on 907 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. I forgot to add the gear lever to my list so would you recommend D, DS or using the paddles?
 
  #16  
Old 09-23-2017, 04:18 PM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,633
Received 5,159 Likes on 3,090 Posts
Default

DS, of course.
 
The following users liked this post:
u102768 (09-23-2017)
  #17  
Old 09-23-2017, 06:33 PM
Ranchero50's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 2,936
Received 969 Likes on 654 Posts
Default

Which ever lets you launch without slippage. I don't think it'll matter much for drag racing. Only real trick will be getting it to launch clean in first vs second.
 
The following users liked this post:
u102768 (09-23-2017)
  #18  
Old 09-23-2017, 10:31 PM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,899
Received 1,538 Likes on 889 Posts
Default

-Put shifter in DS .

-Hold down dsc button for approx 8-10 sec a chime will indicate it's turned off .

-Paddle shift down to first so you can heat up the tyres with a lengthly burnout

-After heating up the tyres the transmission would have shifted up to 3rd so put back into 1st via paddle shifter

-At the line dial up the revs just before you break traction then release brake pedal and depress accelerate (I went approx 50% throttle for approx half second then fully depressed)
 

Last edited by steve_k_xk; 09-23-2017 at 10:35 PM.
The following users liked this post:
u102768 (09-24-2017)
  #19  
Old 09-23-2017, 10:49 PM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,899
Received 1,538 Likes on 889 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ranchero50
I thought the ECU fought different gears. Impressive numbers for a NA car.

I'd probably redo the intake tract from air filter to throttle body and see if there's anything there. Otherwise, car diet time.
Yes your exactly correct the ecu/tcm do 'fight' different gears hence we are working on the software component so the vehicle doesn't go into limp mode when we install the shorter ratio.
 
  #20  
Old 09-24-2017, 01:10 AM
Ranchero50's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 2,936
Received 969 Likes on 654 Posts
Default

Also I never heated street tires. They tended to just get slicker. Quick bunny hop after the water to rub anything off the tread and pull up to the line. 'No water' on the windshield keeps the tires from getting too wet. I had a set of cheap meaty Fulda's on my '93 stang that would launch like ET streets. My 60' times were never great but the car pulled hard in the top end, 11.73 @ 119 mpg with a 400 hp torque built 302. 10-1 comp with a very mild cam and 5 psi of Paxton helping.

Single track is just asking for the right tire to break loose easier. Again, clean get away so you can get on the throttle hard. Top end speed says HP, Low ET equal efficiency. Our combos will not be efficient.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.