S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

V8 4.2 NA misfire on high load

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-14-2019, 04:38 PM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default V8 4.2 NA misfire on high load

Dear all,

4 days ago, after a P0301 fault code, I changed the cylinder 1 coil (replaced with a NGK). I got rid of the code and during 2 days, the car ran fine (but to be honest I'm not self convinced of that. A idle, with P engaged, there is a kind of very little shaking and I'm pretty sure it was not the case before the replacement).

Today, I noticed that at full load, I have huge misfires. I don't know exactly how can I name this behavior : misfire or a fuel-cut. Let say the car is stopped, you engage full throttle, the rpm rise to 2k, there is a kind of fuel-cut, then the power come back, the rpm rise to 3k, there another kind of fuel cut and so one. It behaves exactly like if the traction control tried to stop a wheelspin. But there was not wheelspin... I'm sure this behavior was not present 2 days ago.

I tried several things to try to isolate the problem:
- de-activate the TCS: no success;
- block the gearbox on 2: no success;
- fill the tank with 98RON fuel instead of E10: no success.

The MIL is off, there is no DTC. The fuel trim is strange but I don't know if it's related: when idle, the LTFT is approx +16% and the STFT is approx -9% ...I don't understand these values, I was thinking that instead of +16/-9 I would have 0/+7...

The car is going to 6,5k rpm with mid load or low load. The problem seems to disappear after 4,5rpm.

Except the weird fuel trim values, the values in the data-stream are correct when idle: fuel pressure @350kpa, MAF @4g/s... I will try to graph them when the problem occur but they don't seem to change a lot... May be it's a resolution problem and my obd2 reader is not able to capture bad values because they are too ephemerals ?

An idea of what can be this problem? Another tests I could lead?

Thanks,

Laurent
 

Last edited by essomba421; 02-14-2019 at 05:03 PM. Reason: typo
  #2  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:18 PM
kr98664's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,349
Received 1,983 Likes on 1,401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by essomba421
4 days ago, after a P0301 fault code, I changed the cylinder 1 coil (replaced with a NGK). I got rid of the code and during 2 days, the car ran fine (but to be honest I'm not self convinced of that. A idle, with P engaged, there is a kind of very little shaking and I'm pretty sure it was not the case before the replacement).

Today, I noticed that at full load, I have huge misfires...
Hmm, your description offers one big clue. After replacing the coil, you then had new symptoms. That would suggest the new coil was bad from stock. Rare, but it happens.

Before entering FullPanicMode™, I'd suggest gambling on another coil. Don't get the same brand from the same source, in case that vendor had a bad batch on the shelf. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt.

The other possibility is something else was disturbed during the replacement. Carefully inspect anything in the area in case a connector wasn't fully seated, a vacuum line got left off, etc.
 

Last edited by kr98664; 02-15-2019 at 06:19 AM.
  #3  
Old 02-15-2019, 02:22 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

+1

You may not yet have got a code but it sounds very like a worse coil than before.
 
  #4  
Old 02-15-2019, 02:37 AM
litteredwithfaults's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: UAE
Posts: 276
Received 54 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Recommend you get the fuel trims under control before anything else. In the old days this engine would be fixed already but modern day combustion calculates tight requirements for air metering so any vacuum leak can cause issues. Search this forum for 'Fuel Trim Primer' to get an idea of the scope and people having similar issues. Have a smoke test done before replacing more parts.

http://jagrepair.com/images/AutoRepa...mer%20Rev2.pdf
http://jagrepair.com/images/AutoRepa...el%20Trims.pdf

If your car was surging at idle the vacuum leak would be easier to call, but the higher RPM complicates it. My guess is unmetered air entering intake, fuel trim compensating by dumping more fuel, O2 sensor cutting fuel due to very rich condition. I am just learning as problems come up and someone with more experience can correct as appropriate.
 
  #5  
Old 02-15-2019, 09:01 AM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

All,

Thank you for your advices.

I tried to correct the fuel trim first and I detected a vacuum leak.

Here the fuel trim on bank 1 (this is nearly the same on bank 2) :

Red curve : STFT Green curve : LTFT Blue curve : rpm Purple curve : MAF

Then, the leak:




The new fuel trims:



Red curve : STFT Green curve : LTFT Blue curve : rpm Purple curve : MAF

The LTFT is decreasing over the time : 7.8 during several miles, 7 during several miles, ... now, 6.2.

And the result :-)



0-60 mph @150k miles
 
The following 2 users liked this post by essomba421:
kr98664 (02-15-2019), Norri (02-16-2019)
  #6  
Old 02-15-2019, 09:08 AM
kr98664's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,349
Received 1,983 Likes on 1,401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by essomba421
I tried to correct the fuel trim first and I detected a vacuum leak.
Ooh, nice work finding the vacuum leak. This leads to two questions:

1) Is the engine running better now?

2) Was the leak created during the recent coil replacement?



 
  #7  
Old 02-15-2019, 09:14 AM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Yes, the engine is running better. With the vacuum leak, the 0-60 would take 20s...

Concerning the vacuum leak it self, I'm confused. The failed coil was on cylinder 1 which is on the left while this hose is on the right...
 
  #8  
Old 02-15-2019, 09:51 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Cyl 1 is on the right (as cars specify left & right) but I guess you meant when standing at the front looking to the rear.

How are the trims on the other bank?

BTW it's possible to have good trims but misfires under high load. You may struggle to see the trims at that high load time.
 
  #9  
Old 02-15-2019, 10:08 AM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
Cyl 1 is on the right (as cars specify left & right) but I guess you meant when standing at the front looking to the rear.
My mistake, you're fully right.

Originally Posted by JagV8
How are the trims on the other bank?
Similar to this bank.

Originally Posted by JagV8
BTW it's possible to have good trims but misfires under high load. You may struggle to see the trims at that high load time.

I will do it and post it.

Laurent
 
  #10  
Old 02-15-2019, 11:41 AM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Here are few more tests:

Normal driving and full load:


Red curve : STFT Green curve : LTFT Blue curve : rpm Purple curve : Calculated load

As expected, STFT is 0.0 and LTFT is blocked at a value. Do you know which value is selected? Is there somewhere stored a LTFT for high load?

Here another test with the cruise control engaged @50 km/h (31mph):


Red curve : STFT Green curve : LTFT Blue curve : rpm Purple curve : Calculated load

The LTFT decrease near -2% while the STFT oscillated between 0 and 5%. I think it's normal. What do you think about these values ? Why the LTFT is not set to 0% and the ECU just plays with STFT?

Here the STFT and LFTF for the 2 banks à@idle, @2,5k rpm and idle. The values are similar but I guess they are a little bit too high.

Red curve : STFT bank 1 Green curve : LTFT bank 1 Blue curve : STFT bank 2 Purple curve : LTFT bank 2

What do you think about these valus ? Another vacuum leak ?

Thanks a lot,

Laurent
 
  #11  
Old 02-15-2019, 12:05 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

To run the engine across a wide range of situations, the PCM stores many LTFT (per bank) values. They're typically stored depending on things like Load and Rpm - a quite big table of values. It tries to get STFT fairly close to zero at each of those and where it finds it needs STFT quite far from zero it will change the stored LTFT (i.e. STFT migrates into LTFT so as to make STFT nearer zero).

Bear in mind that small LTFTs (say within 5 of zero but you could argue 3 of zero or 7 from zero) is normal.

A typical catalytic converter complicates this because it needs to store O2 briefly and release it and keep cycling like that - so you can expect STFT to be swinging around to make that happen.

A further complication is that at WOT (wide open throttle) it's common to run OL (open loop) and then the PCM aims to run richer than usual (to protect the engine from any risk of lean - which is an engine killer).

If I've not missed anything, your graphs look OK.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by JagV8:
essomba421 (02-15-2019), kr98664 (02-15-2019)
  #12  
Old 02-15-2019, 12:19 PM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Thank you JagV8 for all these explanations.

Is there a way to reset the LFTF values? Unpluging the battery? Is-it useful to reset it ?

And do you know if it is possible to get the values of the misfires counters with an iCarSoft 930?

Thank you again,

Laurent
 

Last edited by essomba421; 02-15-2019 at 12:21 PM. Reason: another question!
  #13  
Old 02-15-2019, 01:06 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

They're all cleared if you disconnect the battery but so also are the OBD monitors. With a car without faults (that means without ones you don't know about as well as any you do!) the monitors will set again quite quickly, but you can get a sort of Catch-22 where there's some fault you perhaps didn't know about which stops the monitors setting and also can't be flagged by any codes because the PCM isn't sure what to trust.

It's fairly rare but I don't like taking chances - you may be happier...

I don't know much about the 930, sorry.
 
  #14  
Old 02-15-2019, 01:25 PM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Thank you again JagV8. I will wait for the PCM to re-recompute the LTFT values naturally :-)
 
  #15  
Old 02-15-2019, 01:59 PM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Another question: at WOT, the PCM switch to OL. The STFT is set to 0% but if I remember well I read that on some cars, a LTFT value is used (which make sens to take into account the injectors fatigue for instance). But on my graph, the LTFT is set to 0 at WOT. Does it mean that this is the value my PCM is using @WOT or does it mean that LTFT is ignored as well as the STFT at WOT on these cars ?

Thanks!

Laurent
 

Last edited by essomba421; 02-15-2019 at 02:00 PM. Reason: typo
  #16  
Old 02-15-2019, 04:09 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

I don't know for sure but I suspect it just uses rich yet reports the values as 0 (it's allowed by OBD I believe). It trusts the MAF (and perhaps MAP) and from that can set the AFR to rich.
 
  #17  
Old 02-16-2019, 03:07 AM
essomba421's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Paris aera
Posts: 48
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I look at the workshop manual. The injection mechanisms are not described. It's not so easy to find fine grain information in this area (concerning a precise model!)

Laurent
 
  #18  
Old 02-16-2019, 10:41 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Did you want the part # or what?
 
  #19  
Old 02-16-2019, 11:04 AM
rf69's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 349
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default Spark plugs gap for 2004 Jaguar XJ8

Originally Posted by kr98664
Hmm, your description offers one big clue. After replacing the coil, you then had new symptoms. That would suggest the new coil was bad from stock. Rare, but it happens.

Before entering FullPanicMode™, I'd suggest gambling on another coil. Don't get the same brand from the same source, in case that vendor had a bad batch on the shelf. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt.

The other possibility is something else was disturbed during the replacement. Carefully inspect anything in the area in case a connector wasn't fully seated, a vacuum line got left off, etc.
do you know the right Spark plugs gap for 2004 Jaguar XJ8 ?
 
  #20  
Old 02-16-2019, 11:05 AM
kr98664's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,349
Received 1,983 Likes on 1,401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by essomba421
I look at the workshop manual. The injection mechanisms are not described. It's not so easy to find fine grain information in this area (concerning a precise model!)

The workshop manual is typically just remove/install instructions. You may be able to find more details in one of the training guides, courtesy of Gus:


JagRepair.com - Jaguar Repair Information Resource


The layout of the training guides can get a little confusing, as some cover more than one engine or vehicle model. Make sure any info you find is applicable to your specific application.

 


Quick Reply: V8 4.2 NA misfire on high load



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.