engine for Jaguar Daimler double six 12- cylinder 6.0 litre year 1972 ?
#1
#2
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes
on
7,101 Posts
#4
Centainly not 1972,
A/C compressor and 4L80E transmission suggest its a 1993 - 1996
As for value....generally low, These late v12 vehicles were sold in small quantities and very reliable so very few replacements are needed. Block would be good for a swap but engine management becomes an issue. That said if you need one in that state you might not find another for a long time.
A/C compressor and 4L80E transmission suggest its a 1993 - 1996
As for value....generally low, These late v12 vehicles were sold in small quantities and very reliable so very few replacements are needed. Block would be good for a swap but engine management becomes an issue. That said if you need one in that state you might not find another for a long time.
Last edited by icsamerica; 02-11-2019 at 08:00 AM.
The following users liked this post:
zarnca (02-11-2019)
#5
#6
So as I see it, a 4l60E, adapter and stand alone controller would offer similar performance to a 6.0 / 4l80e for much lower cost which could get done and back on the road in a reasonable amount of time.
As a general rule, never convert a car to something that already exists, just go buy it. It will cost about the same or less in the end if you factor in resale value. It's better to convert a car to something that does not exist for example, adding a 6 speed T56 or 4l60e. Both transmissions are a better fit for a GT.
Time is money, life is short. Plan accordingly.
Last edited by icsamerica; 02-11-2019 at 10:00 AM.
#7
Yes I agree with you - time is money, life is short My 5.3 engine is ok, but have problems with Oil leaking. Every year is worst (rear crankshaft seal). Repair is complicated and very expensive...One more question: is possible to put only 6.0 engine inside (is same dimensions? )and hold all odhers components same ( my gearbox, computer, whires, fuel injections…). Or this this 6.0 engine need totally different "support"?
Last edited by zarnca; 02-12-2019 at 01:57 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
I've always admired the Jaguar V12. Ran a Daimler Double-Six VdP in 1976 but the single figure mpg forced me back to a 6 cylinder in less than eight months.
I think this summarises the V12 development and models:
5.3 Litre
1971-1974: E-type Series III
1972-1981: Jaguar XJ12
1975-1977: Jaguar XJ12C
1972-1981: Daimler Double-Six
1975-1977: Daimler Double-Six Coupe
1975-1981: Jaguar XJ-S
5.3 Litre HE
1982-1992: Jaguar XJ-S / Jaguar XJS
1982-1992: Jaguar XJ12
1982-1992: Daimler Double-Six
6.0 Litre
1988-1993: Jaguar XJR-S
1993-1995: Jaguar XJS
1993-1997: Jaguar XJ12
1993-1997: Daimler Double-Six
Daimler is the prestige Jaguar model specification in Europe and Australia but not available in the US where Mercedes own the rights to the brand. I expect the highest US specification would therefore have been marketed as Jaguar XJ12 Vanden Plas.
It would be good to determine engine number ranges for the above but I can't find anything official from Jaguar.
Graham
I think this summarises the V12 development and models:
5.3 Litre
1971-1974: E-type Series III
1972-1981: Jaguar XJ12
1975-1977: Jaguar XJ12C
1972-1981: Daimler Double-Six
1975-1977: Daimler Double-Six Coupe
1975-1981: Jaguar XJ-S
5.3 Litre HE
1982-1992: Jaguar XJ-S / Jaguar XJS
1982-1992: Jaguar XJ12
1982-1992: Daimler Double-Six
6.0 Litre
1988-1993: Jaguar XJR-S
1993-1995: Jaguar XJS
1993-1997: Jaguar XJ12
1993-1997: Daimler Double-Six
Daimler is the prestige Jaguar model specification in Europe and Australia but not available in the US where Mercedes own the rights to the brand. I expect the highest US specification would therefore have been marketed as Jaguar XJ12 Vanden Plas.
It would be good to determine engine number ranges for the above but I can't find anything official from Jaguar.
Graham
The following users liked this post:
Junkyardjohn (02-12-2019)
#9
Yes I agree with you - time is money, life is short My 5.3 engine is ok, but have problems with Oil leaking. Every year is worst (rear crankshaft seal). Repair is complicated and very expensive...One more question: is possible to put only 6.0 engine inside (is same dimensions? )and hold all odhers components same ( my gearbox, computer, whires, fuel injections…). Or this this 6.0 engine need totally different "support"?
As a practical matter, not a good use of time. becasue in the end you will have solved an oil leak but created many new issues.
I get your dilema, the early rope seal car leak bad. some times. You may want to repair it. Review this.
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...l-seal-151343/
If you like the car you may want to approach it differently.
Engine out, fix the seals
upgrade / replace engine mounts
Upgrade / replace rack, subframe and suspension bushes
New exhaust donuts and or down pipes
Install 4l60E
In the end you'll have an over all better car for a lower price that's less of a science project. Might still leak a bit here and there.
The 6.0 / 4l80e is a great combo but with out the complete harness, TCU and ECU it's just not practical, Doable yes, if you want to climb that mountain becasue its there then go for it but the learning curve is steep if you've not done this before.
Last edited by icsamerica; 02-12-2019 at 07:59 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Junkyardjohn (02-12-2019)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Alan Lindsay
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
7
01-26-2018 05:44 PM
rmorgan40
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
16
01-01-2018 03:22 AM
deans auto
XJ XJ12 ( X305 )
2
06-02-2015 07:59 AM
deans auto
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
1
05-20-2015 03:44 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)