XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III 1968-1992

XJ6 Series 3 rear diferential ratio choices ?

 
  #1  
Old 05-31-2019, 12:56 PM
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: NC
Posts: 32
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default XJ6 Series 3 rear diferential ratio choices ?

Hi everyone !
I'm about to break down and finally start some of the major suspension restoration / repair projects on my 1985 XJ6 VP ( road salt corrosion mainly, gotta love it ! ). I already have two replacement 2.88 rear end assembles from which to make one good checked / overhauled unit but just saw a used pumpkin from a 1983 Euro XJ6 with 3.058:1 gears. I have also seen some used positive lock units as well. Would it be worthwhile to change to a different gear ratio ? I plan on keeping the 4.2 XK engine but MIGHT change the transmission to a GM overdrive unit later on. The add states that ( with the stock transmission ) it will give more get up and go than the 2.88 without killing fuel economy. What does everyone here think ? Would I be better off just waiting until I do swap transmissions ( if ever ) and maybe go for a positive lock unit instead ? Thanks for any advice / ideas !

Cheers,
Brian
 
  #2  
Old 05-31-2019, 04:31 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 223 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

I'm not an expert but:

I can't imagine the 4.2 stock engine developing so much torque you would need a locking differential.

I have an XJ6 that is all sock and another one with 4-speed automatic. Adding that extra gear makes all the difference in the world.

I know in other parts of the world gas is much more expensive but how much will you drive the car that fuel costs are really something to worry about? A couple years ago we drove a 1972 Cadillac form Ohio to California. 12 mpg. But boy was it fun.

If it was me I would go with the stock ratio and install a 4-speed automatic. Not an overdrive but 4 gears with 1:1 in top gear. That will transform the car in the best way possible and it will still look stock.

Jeff
 
  #3  
Old 05-31-2019, 08:08 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 378
Received 49 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I am pretty sure it deeper gears will cut into your fuel economy. Two reasons: 1) The engine will be turning more RPMs which consumes more fuel. 2) The car will be more peppy and fun to drive, and you won't be able to resist putting your foot into it! (and who can blame you?!)

Get the 4 speed transmission... The deeper 1st and 2nd gears will give you the performance you want and the top gear will give you the economy you want. It's the best of both worlds.
 
  #4  
Old 05-31-2019, 08:16 PM
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 20,147
Received 6,544 Likes on 4,856 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
but just saw a used pumpkin from a 1983 Euro XJ6 with 3.058:1 gears. I have also seen some used positive lock units as well. Would it be worthwhile to change to a different gear ratio ?
Going from 2.88 to 3.06 isn't all that much of a change but, as long as you're gonna have everything apart, I say 'go for it'. The car will be a bit more peppy; fuel economy should suffer too much. You'll have to correct some speedometer error, though.

I went from 2.88 to 3.31 in my V12 car and am delighted with the improvement and response. Of course the RPM is a lot higher and it cost me 2-3 mpg at highway speed....but these days I seldom do road trips so it isn't an issue for me.

Cheers
DD
 
  #5  
Old 05-31-2019, 08:48 PM
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,703
Received 856 Likes on 553 Posts
Default

If you never want to touch it again install the 3:08. It will be an incremental upgrade that will offer a little bit more quickness that will be noticed. At moderate highway speeds the difference in RPM will be minimal.

If you plan on installing a 4-speed in the future definitely do the 3.31. This ratio with a 4-speed overdrive transmission like a 4L60e or 700 R4 is damn near perfect.
 
  #6  
Old 06-01-2019, 06:33 AM
yachtmanbuttson's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Palm City, Florida
Posts: 591
Received 71 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

What four speed auto transmissions will bolt right up to a 4.2? Any drive shaft length issues to deal with?
 
  #7  
Old 06-01-2019, 06:49 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 151
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I swapped in a 3.31 into an 1985 XJ6, and you can hardly tell the difference in acceleration. These were never fast cars.

I have a V12 VDP with 3.31 and it makes a big difference.

The 3.07 is sought after by the E Type guys. You could maybe sell if for $1000.

John's cars have the kits to put a T700 in. I did one years ago, with 4.09 diff from a 2.8 litre XJ6. It really went good, and still rev'd 600 RPM less on the highway. To me that was max improvement in both power and economy. It was not as smooth though, with some vibrations entering the cabin, likely due to the hockey puck rear mount..

Good luck,
Rob
 
The following users liked this post:
Doug (06-01-2019)
  #8  
Old 06-01-2019, 05:16 PM
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: NC
Posts: 32
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Hi,
Thanks for all the advice & ideas, I think for now I'll just go with the best testing 2.88 pumpkin ( maybe new seals, haven't decided yet ) of those I have, then swap to a 3.31 if / when I change the transmission. That way I'll only have to deal with speedometer issues once. If anyone is looking for the 3.058, Pauls Jag in Florida has it on their E-bay store page.

Cheers,
Brian
 
  #9  
Old 06-03-2019, 02:46 PM
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 5,727
Received 1,945 Likes on 1,569 Posts
Default

My LT! and 4l60 e handles the 2.88 with alacrity. Loafs at 70 in Od, but a throttle stab gets results with no need to down shift...

It does use the GM "hockey puck" rear munt. No vibration issues. I did go to a one piece drive shaft. Odd center joint seems superfluous..

At times, a mystery vibration can be fixed by "clocking" the torque converter.


Carl
 
  #10  
Old 06-04-2019, 08:38 PM
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Posts: 6,602
Received 903 Likes on 693 Posts
Default

i use a 3.73 powerlok with a 700R4 overdive trans. ,, in overdrive final ratio is 2.60-1,, better for cruisin than 2.88 with 3spd trans!

but it really shines for acclleration and passing,!
 
The following users liked this post:
Doug (06-04-2019)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elviukai
XF and XFR ( X250 )
5
10-02-2017 07:54 PM
TXJagR
F-Type ( X152 )
24
02-22-2015 04:13 PM
weisberg
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
17
03-22-2014 06:29 PM
daboss085
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
8
12-05-2012 10:38 AM
deelli
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
3
10-17-2012 09:22 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: XJ6 Series 3 rear diferential ratio choices ?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: