LSD swap
#1
#2
#3
Sorry boys
Yes currently running a 3.58 Lincoln differential in my Xk no codes no TCM adjustments.
Due to the shorter ratio it gets into 6 gear alot sooner on the city roads so fuel consumption actually started to decrease on the open road it's also very good 9-9.5L/100km
Now to the juicy part the xk is always in the power band now it feels a hell of a lot more responsive & torquey .
The big downside it's virtually impossible to launch it off the line now desperately need that quaife !!
Yes currently running a 3.58 Lincoln differential in my Xk no codes no TCM adjustments.
Due to the shorter ratio it gets into 6 gear alot sooner on the city roads so fuel consumption actually started to decrease on the open road it's also very good 9-9.5L/100km
Now to the juicy part the xk is always in the power band now it feels a hell of a lot more responsive & torquey .
The big downside it's virtually impossible to launch it off the line now desperately need that quaife !!
The following users liked this post:
Panthro (11-24-2018)
#4
The following users liked this post:
MarkyUK (11-04-2018)
#5
the reason I changed the rear end was simply for a shorter diff ratio 3.31 to 3.58 which in turn would liven up the performance of the n/a 4.2 which it definitely has
#6
Trending Topics
#8
All other things being equal, the higher number (3.58 Lincoln) will be quicker off the line, 0-60 and 1/4 mile. But top speed will be lower, as will fuel economy.
That's why back in the day the drag racers preferred 4.56 or 4.11 gears. I recall that at 60 mph my '60 Vette with the 4-speed and 4.11 Positraction rear would be turning 2,000 RPM. Today's cars are geared for economy and turn around 1,200 RPM at 60 mph.
That's why back in the day the drag racers preferred 4.56 or 4.11 gears. I recall that at 60 mph my '60 Vette with the 4-speed and 4.11 Positraction rear would be turning 2,000 RPM. Today's cars are geared for economy and turn around 1,200 RPM at 60 mph.
The following 2 users liked this post by Stuart S:
Sean W (11-03-2018),
steve_k_xk (04-02-2020)
#9
Thank you Steve. I was under the mistaken impression it was LSD. Going off memory and couldn't fine the thread.
#10
All other things being equal, the higher number (3.58 Lincoln) will be quicker off the line, 0-60 and 1/4 mile. But top speed will be lower, as will fuel economy.
That's why back in the day the drag racers preferred 4.56 or 4.11 gears. I recall that at 60 mph my '60 Vette with the 4-speed and 4.11 Positraction rear would be turning 2,000 RPM. Today's cars are geared for economy and turn around 1,200 RPM at 60 mph.
That's why back in the day the drag racers preferred 4.56 or 4.11 gears. I recall that at 60 mph my '60 Vette with the 4-speed and 4.11 Positraction rear would be turning 2,000 RPM. Today's cars are geared for economy and turn around 1,200 RPM at 60 mph.
Travelling at 100km it's sitting at roughly 1900rpm
That being said the Maserati gran Turismo with the xf6hp (same gear box) runs a 3.7 or 3.9 can't remember off the top off my head
#12
From my experience with a 5.0 mustang Friday morning a higher ratio affects performance at top end too. No blower whine and loud enough that it wasn't turbo'd so N/A. It sounded like a NASCAR engine wound up tight as it went by.
Old //R just couldn't accelerate with it from 90+. The fact that the other guy was making poor lane keeping decisions made it difficult to disengage. Usually I just pull a couple car lengths for separation and slow down. This clown wanted to race in traffic. After he tried to pass three times and nearly rear ended the cars in the slower lanes I just slowed way down and he sat there flashing his high beams until an opening came up, blasted it and slowed back down a 1/4 mile ahead.
Kind of a crappy day commute because the ride home was through monsoon rains where one front tire or the other was hydroplaning a good bit at 45 mph. I eventually tucked in behind a semi and rode in his tracks.
Old //R just couldn't accelerate with it from 90+. The fact that the other guy was making poor lane keeping decisions made it difficult to disengage. Usually I just pull a couple car lengths for separation and slow down. This clown wanted to race in traffic. After he tried to pass three times and nearly rear ended the cars in the slower lanes I just slowed way down and he sat there flashing his high beams until an opening came up, blasted it and slowed back down a 1/4 mile ahead.
Kind of a crappy day commute because the ride home was through monsoon rains where one front tire or the other was hydroplaning a good bit at 45 mph. I eventually tucked in behind a semi and rode in his tracks.
#13
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,653
Received 1,010 Likes
on
717 Posts
Resurrecting this thread.
Do I recall correctly a thread in which someone took an e-diff from an XF and put it into their 07-09 XKR??
I cannot seem to locate the thread. Can anyone else?
Though I had the Quaife in the XJR and liked it very much; I am looking for an alternative cost effective LSD solution for my aging xkr.
Thoughts anyone?
Do I recall correctly a thread in which someone took an e-diff from an XF and put it into their 07-09 XKR??
I cannot seem to locate the thread. Can anyone else?
Though I had the Quaife in the XJR and liked it very much; I am looking for an alternative cost effective LSD solution for my aging xkr.
Thoughts anyone?
#14
#15
I've wondered why they went to an E-diff but I assume it was for gas mileage. I hadn't heard of it until I got my car but now I'm seeing it more often and especially trucks. I've always had plain old posi units in most of my fun cars so this was a new one on me. I don't abuse mine so hopefully it won't become a problem.
#17
No chance to retrofit an E-Diff to a 4.2L XK or XKR, for one simple reason that the software in the various modules of the car is missing to control it.
You might be thinking of the chap who fitted the mechanical LSD from an F-Type V6S into his 5.0L XK. This was easy because the diff in the 5.0L XK is the same make/design as the F-Type V6.
So it worked out fine for him, however there is an additional complication with doing that swap into a 4.2L, the driveshafts are a different design, as well as the propshaft.
You can buy a kit of driveshafts and propshaft for the 4.2L XK which will work with the F-Type V6S diff, but good luck finding them 2nd hand.
Retail price for a new shaft kit in the USA is $1825... then you also need to source the diff itself...
You might be thinking of the chap who fitted the mechanical LSD from an F-Type V6S into his 5.0L XK. This was easy because the diff in the 5.0L XK is the same make/design as the F-Type V6.
So it worked out fine for him, however there is an additional complication with doing that swap into a 4.2L, the driveshafts are a different design, as well as the propshaft.
You can buy a kit of driveshafts and propshaft for the 4.2L XK which will work with the F-Type V6S diff, but good luck finding them 2nd hand.
Retail price for a new shaft kit in the USA is $1825... then you also need to source the diff itself...
#19
I've wondered why they went to an E-diff but I assume it was for gas mileage. I hadn't heard of it until I got my car but now I'm seeing it more often and especially trucks. I've always had plain old posi units in most of my fun cars so this was a new one on me. I don't abuse mine so hopefully it won't become a problem.
The following users liked this post:
guy (04-13-2019)
#20
Judging by time slips of users with Quafie , there isn't much if any improvement in 60ft over open differential. Unless I'm missing something ...
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 111.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 Supercharged, (stock with Alpha Jag ECU tune), estimated power: 600+ hp, 7.7sec 1.8th mi/95mph
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 111.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 Supercharged, (stock with Alpha Jag ECU tune), estimated power: 600+ hp, 7.7sec 1.8th mi/95mph