XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-25-2014, 11:04 PM
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,978
Received 2,540 Likes on 1,411 Posts
Default Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.

After driving an F-type V8S for 4 days, and my 2010 XKR on the track all weekend, I drove my 2002 XKR from Los Angeles to San Jose and back with stops in Bakersfield and Arvin along the way. In all, I drove about 680 miles, averaged somewhere between 70-80mph, got over 22 mpg, top down most of the day, all on a car with well over 150,000 miles on it. No hiccups, just a wonderful drive in a beautiful car.

It may not have the 5L--500hp engine of the F-type or my coupe, and it certainly doesn't have the suspension nor the handling of either, but it's no less pleasurable on a long drive, and in my humble opinion, far and away better looking than either of them.

What a class act!
 
Attached Thumbnails Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.-dscf0403-1280x960-.jpg   Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.-dscf0524-1280x960-.jpg   Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.-dscf1357-1280x960-copy.jpg   Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.-dscf1494-1280x960-.jpg  
The following 8 users liked this post by tberg:
BlkCat (11-27-2014), ccfulton (11-26-2014), cjd777 (11-26-2014), Fulton (11-26-2014), Hdpartsman00XKR (11-26-2014), jagxk82005seneca (11-26-2014), mjlaris (11-26-2014), sklimii (11-26-2014) and 3 others liked this post. (Show less...)
  #2  
Old 11-26-2014, 02:12 AM
.:Jimbo:.'s Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 49
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Yep, as much as the F-type has received plenty of hype and praise, and rather rightfully so with the available mad engines, I still find the XK8,XKR the most stunning two door jag since the e-type! Everything about it comes off with this admirable effortless in terms of appearance and road dynamics, where as the newer cars are trying so much harder with their shouty engines and more stylized designs! Sometimes, newer just is not better!
 
The following 5 users liked this post by .:Jimbo:.:
Davidsw (11-26-2014), mjlaris (11-26-2014), PaulCarr (11-28-2014), sklimii (11-26-2014), tberg (11-26-2014)
  #3  
Old 11-26-2014, 08:11 AM
mjlaris's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 1,079
Received 182 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by .:Jimbo:.
Yep, as much as the F-type has received plenty of hype and praise, and rather rightfully so with the available mad engines, I still find the XK8,XKR the most stunning two door jag since the e-type! Everything about it comes off with this admirable effortless in terms of appearance and road dynamics, where as the newer cars are trying so much harder with their shouty engines and more stylized designs! Sometimes, newer just is not better!
+1, the XK8/R is a GT not a drag racer and is a pleasure to drive.


Mark
 
  #4  
Old 11-26-2014, 09:28 AM
80sRule's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MI
Posts: 1,865
Received 915 Likes on 560 Posts
Default

Ive had this opinion on several makes and models, but sometimes proportions don't look as good on the smaller cars. The F-Type is an excellent car, but I think the extra length of the XKR makes the car look more lean and sleak.

I own an Audi A8L, and I think it looks proportionately better than the same era and styling A4 and A6 (not that they're ugly by any means!). The size makes it look right. Whenever I see a C-Class, 3-Series or A4, I just see a smaller and less pretty version of the S-Class, 7-Series and A8. Same thing with SLK vs SL, Z3 vs Z8, and here with the F-Type vs XKR.
 
  #5  
Old 11-26-2014, 11:28 AM
Juke's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 219
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Glad to hear stories like this buddy. It makes me have extremely high hope for years to come... I wouldn't replace my XKR for ANY car in the world right now! And that's 100 % truth. Ok ok ok maybe a Bugatti....
 
  #6  
Old 11-26-2014, 04:33 PM
dsnyder586's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 2,134
Received 540 Likes on 421 Posts
Default

I had a similar experience this weekend, and at the end of the day the XK8 just "feels" right to me.
I loved the power and *sound* (oh that sound) of the F-type, and everything was the bees knees as far as it goes, but I am happy to be back to motoring at a regular pace, with a little more "float" to my drive.
 
  #7  
Old 11-26-2014, 09:13 PM
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,978
Received 2,540 Likes on 1,411 Posts
Default

Hi David,
Did you have a good time with your F-type Coupe? I would have loved to have had a coupe at the track on Saturday, but I drove the convertible several hundred miles, and really got a taste for it. I think it was pretty terrific with a few exceptions. But that sound, oh that sound, is worth the price of admission, alone!

Having said that, I still like the body of the first generation XK/XKR better. I had my 2002 parked next to the F-type, and to my eyes, it's no contest. Obviously in every driving category the F-type and second generation XK/XKR are worlds above our cars except for smoothness, but as I said, I drove 700 miles yesterday, and it was a pleasureable, smooth, thoroughly enjoyable ride.

Let's get together sometime soon. Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family.
Ted
 
  #8  
Old 11-27-2014, 08:41 AM
aode06's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio USA
Posts: 729
Received 256 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

Our years are the best,these newer younger engineers, are using laser computer aided drawing now, and you can see that on the car. Not my cup of tea.
 

Last edited by aode06; 11-27-2014 at 08:43 AM.
The following users liked this post:
BlkCat (11-27-2014)
  #9  
Old 11-27-2014, 09:41 AM
max224's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 996
Received 161 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

+1 I wouldn't be interested in a woman that was designed that way either (smooth curves beat sharp angles any day!). Okay, so I'm not politically correct......
 
  #10  
Old 11-27-2014, 10:24 AM
BlkCat's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 424
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aode06
Our years are the best,these newer younger engineers, are using laser computer aided drawing now, and you can see that on the car. Not my cup of tea.


It is not only the CAD and all that, it is new safety laws that have to be complied with that compromise design. Europe (not sure about US) have laws now that demand crush zones on the hood so that when you hit a pedestrian the hood gives instead of the pedestrian. Not sure if it really helps, but...


So, when you raise the hood off the motor to give the crush space, everything else in the design changes. All the way to the back of the car. That's why all these new cars look fat. They are. The designers are trying to disguise the issue. I think the Jag F type does a good job of it.


But in the end, cars look better when designed without this restriction.


You couldn't make a car that looks like the XK8 now. Enjoy it while you have it.


Jack
 
The following users liked this post:
mjlaris (11-28-2014)
  #11  
Old 11-27-2014, 11:29 AM
dsnyder586's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 2,134
Received 540 Likes on 421 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tberg
Hi David,
Did you have a good time with your F-type Coupe? I would have loved to have had a coupe at the track on Saturday, but I drove the convertible several hundred miles, and really got a taste for it. I think it was pretty terrific with a few exceptions. But that sound, oh that sound, is worth the price of admission, alone!

Having said that, I still like the body of the first generation XK/XKR better. I had my 2002 parked next to the F-type, and to my eyes, it's no contest. Obviously in every driving category the F-type and second generation XK/XKR are worlds above our cars except for smoothness, but as I said, I drove 700 miles yesterday, and it was a pleasureable, smooth, thoroughly enjoyable ride.

Let's get together sometime soon. Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family.
Ted
Hey Ted,

I liked having the coupe, as it was a change from my "norm" of top down driving- but it was like taking a vacation to a tropical island, boy was it fun and exciting but ultimately is was nice to be home again in my XK8.

We should get together- PM me and perhaps we can meet up for dinner with the spouses! Happy Thanksgiving!

Dave
 
  #12  
Old 11-27-2014, 11:35 AM
EZDriver's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Holly Lake Ranch, Texas
Posts: 2,125
Received 277 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

I don't think there is a better looking car than the XK Jags during that 10 year period.
 
  #13  
Old 11-27-2014, 05:45 PM
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,978
Received 2,540 Likes on 1,411 Posts
Default

EZDRIVER,

These cars are especially beautiful when they're Carnival Red, aren't they?

David, I'll pick a day and a place half way between us, and I'll p.m. in a day or two when I figure out my and my wife's schedule.

Everyone, have a Happy and Blessed Thanksgiving.
Ted
 
Attached Thumbnails Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.-dscf0524-1280x960-.jpg   Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.-dscf0522-1280x960-.jpg  
  #14  
Old 11-28-2014, 01:50 AM
Sentinelist's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Texas
Posts: 894
Received 149 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Hey Ted- have you ever made a post without attaching photos of your car? I agree- the F-Type doesn't do much for me, except that incredible sound it makes.

Originally Posted by 80sRule
Ive had this opinion on several makes and models, but sometimes proportions don't look as good on the smaller cars. The F-Type is an excellent car, but I think the extra length of the XKR makes the car look more lean and sleak.

I own an Audi A8L, and I think it looks proportionately better than the same era and styling A4 and A6 (not that they're ugly by any means!). The size makes it look right. Whenever I see a C-Class, 3-Series or A4, I just see a smaller and less pretty version of the S-Class, 7-Series and A8. Same thing with SLK vs SL, Z3 vs Z8, and here with the F-Type vs XKR.
I agree and can relate the same.

Originally Posted by BlkCat
It is not only the CAD and all that, it is new safety laws that have to be complied with that compromise design. Europe (not sure about US) have laws now that demand crush zones on the hood so that when you hit a pedestrian the hood gives instead of the pedestrian. Not sure if it really helps, but...


So, when you raise the hood off the motor to give the crush space, everything else in the design changes. All the way to the back of the car. That's why all these new cars look fat. They are. The designers are trying to disguise the issue. I think the Jag F type does a good job of it.


But in the end, cars look better when designed without this restriction.


You couldn't make a car that looks like the XK8 now. Enjoy it while you have it.


Jack
Excellent point! I hadn't thought about it that way before but I think you nailed it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hoodun
XJS ( X27 )
40
02-20-2023 05:52 AM
LilaJagHubby
US Lower Atlantic
5
03-01-2017 10:20 AM
wannabebuyer
XF and XFR ( X250 )
4
10-01-2015 12:34 PM
bydand
XF and XFR ( X250 )
8
09-28-2015 09:47 AM
bydand
XF and XFR ( X250 )
1
09-27-2015 12:00 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Ole Reliable, what a pleasure.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.