|
I agree with the too cartoonish look on the Vision GT. The old CX-75 is wonderful with the exception of the nose. It pokes out just a tad too much for me. Almost like a sucker fish. Bring it back about 2 inches and I think it'll make the hoodline flow better.
|
Originally Posted by JacksonvilleJag
(Post 2229061)
I agree with the too cartoonish look on the Vision GT. The old CX-75 is wonderful with the exception of the nose. It pokes out just a tad too much for me. Almost like a sucker fish. Bring it back about 2 inches and I think it'll make the hoodline flow better.
|
Originally Posted by Unhingd
(Post 2229055)
I prefer the design direction of the old CX-75. The new Vision GT concept is headed off into Fisker land and looking a bit too cartoonish. The 25” wheels are over-doing it.
That said, Dragy has exposed that mid-engine cars are not even remotely competitive in straight line speed with front engine. The top 50 cars on the global 0-60 leaderboard are front engine, with only a few MRE cars making the bottom fraction of the top 100. The same has been true on the race track in 2020 with front engine dominating mid-rear engine in mixed racing. Remember when there was auto racing? |
There is an F-TYPE in that movie. If you watch the scene where Bond pulls into the mansion parking lot with all the exotic cars. An F-TYPE is parked a few spots from his Aston Martin.
|
Originally Posted by RacerX
(Post 2230082)
For not building the CX-75 as a halo car for the brand, Jaguar deserves to die. Penny wise, pound foolish.
That said, Dragy has exposed that mid-engine cars are not even remotely competitive in straight line speed with front engine. The top 50 cars on the global 0-60 leaderboard are front engine, with only a few MRE cars making the bottom fraction of the top 100. The same has been true on the race track in 2020 with front engine dominating mid-rear engine in mixed racing. Remember when there was auto racing? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands