XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

DB9 vs XKR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2016 | 07:34 PM
  #81  
rscultho's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 264
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk
"The db9 performance exceeded the xkr significancy" I cant see this even remotely possible when the fastest times I could find listed for the DB9 were

DB9 - 12.9 @112mph & 13.2 @110.25mph

Whilst the 5.0 xkr

XKR- 12.6 @115mph

It might feel faster but the numbers dont lie... it just might be the particular way the V12 delivers its power that makes it feel quicker
Firstly, I had a DBS, not a DB9.

Secondly, I had a true stick, which was almost 350 lbs lighter than a DBS with an automatic. My DBS weighed ~3300lbs. An XKR weighs around 3800 lbs.

I remember the test drive of the DBS. I went down an on-ramp onto Interstate 400 North. I started at 0 at the top, and was at almost 100MPH buy the bottom. My XKR, full bore on the same ramp hit about 80MPH by the bottom.

It was SIGNIFICANTLY faster, and pulled MUCH harder. I drove the car for 18 months. I had driven 3 XKR's before the DBS, the last one being my 2010 XKR.

Don't really care what numbers are posted on the 'net.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2016 | 10:00 PM
  #82  
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 1,674
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Sorry I stand corrected
2009 DBS 12.34 @118mph yes that is motoring along very rapidly !!
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2016 | 03:18 AM
  #83  
Ozmag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 243
Likes: 39
From: Leicestershire
Default

The DBS should probably be compared to the XKR-S but even then the price difference is huge, in Australia I would reckon about double for a similar age car
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2016 | 07:20 AM
  #84  
jagtoes's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 5,209
Likes: 1,846
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by Ozmag
The DBS should probably be compared to the XKR-S but even then the price difference is huge, in Australia I would reckon about double for a similar age car
From what I've read the DBS and the XKR are both at 510 HP and a close torque rating. 6.0L V12 vs 5.0L V8. It most likely would be a close race and would depend on the driver skill. I'd like to see the head to head.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2016 | 09:51 AM
  #85  
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 2,622
From: Los Angeles
Old Jun 18, 2016 | 05:13 PM
  #86  
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 1,674
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Yes absolutely nothing between the two vehicles
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2016 | 07:45 AM
  #87  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

Going to look at a 2012 Maserati GranTurismo S today for sale at the local Ferrari/Maserati dealer.

Sure looks pretty

 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 05:38 AM
  #88  
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 1,674
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by mosesbotbol
Going to look at a 2012 Maserati GranTurismo S today for sale at the local Ferrari/Maserati dealer.

Sure looks pretty

Ive always said if Jaguar can't get their act together and produce a 2+2 for its consumers i'd be on the market for a maserati GT next

Great selection !!
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 07:18 AM
  #89  
jagtoes's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 5,209
Likes: 1,846
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk
Ive always said if Jaguar can't get their act together and produce a 2+2 for its consumers i'd be on the market for a maserati GT next

Great selection !!
You might until you see the normal maintenance schedule and costs. The difference in parts costs is fairly significant compared to Jag. The styling is OK in my eyes but not enough for me to buy one. But once again it's a matter of personal opinion. Go for what you like.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 07:47 AM
  #90  
tberg's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 2,622
From: Los Angeles
Default

Beautiful car but as others have said, beware of extraordinary maintenance costs and time. A friend has had his Maserati in the shop 29 days in its first year.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 08:37 AM
  #91  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

Well, I am already about 4K in maintenance on the Lotus this season and been averaging around 2K previous seasons...

My thoughts are that there are only 2 Lotus dealers in New England, yet there are 4 Maserati dealers in MA alone. There are more indy shops that can work on a Maserati than Lotus. With the Aston, I would have to buy an older model year car for my price point and I question which of the two (Aston or Maserati) would be less expensive to own.

One thing after seeing and driving the car yesterday was the black chrome option. The door window trim and exhaust tips are black chrome. Everything else is bright. I thought it was an odd contrast and looks like an afterthought. I would want to revert it, but don't know if that is an option or advisable.

I did not give the car a fair shake on the test drive. It was simply driving a mile down the HWY and turning around back to the dealership. No twisties or anything. Felt bigger and heavier than the XK and was like a Caddy compared to the Lotus. Chassis was like a Caddy compared to Rapide or Lotus when comes to flex and precision feel. Engine had some grunt, seats were comfy and looks fun to wash & detail.

Not sure how I feel on this car. I am torn.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 09:44 AM
  #92  
XXXAngelXXX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 129
Likes: 43
From: Stuttgart/Germany
Default

Like rscultho i had a DBS 2+2 TT2 - it is a nice car and i miss it a lot BUT i don't prefer it over my XK-RS - it is way more of a beast

pictures here

www.xxxangelxxx.de - assimilated by the Britts since 1995!
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 10:47 AM
  #93  
tampamark's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 636
From: tampa, fl
Default

Originally Posted by XXXAngelXXX
Like rscultho i had a DBS 2+2 TT2 - it is a nice car and i miss it a lot BUT i don't prefer it over my XK-RS - it is way more of a beast

pictures here

www.xxxangelxxx.de - assimilated by the Britts since 1995!
There are folks on here with some nice cars and collections. But none of them have impressed me as much as that beautiful DBS. Even if you prefer the XKR-S I would take that DBS in a heartbeat. You are my hero! Mainly because while I can afford any car I want I am too conservative at this point to take the leap into the next level of auto class.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 11:24 AM
  #94  
XXXAngelXXX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 129
Likes: 43
From: Stuttgart/Germany
Default

Once in you lifetime you HAVE to own a DBS (i still miss it and my heart is still bleeding) and then one must move forward :P
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 12:43 PM
  #95  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

Originally Posted by XXXAngelXXX
Once in you lifetime you HAVE to own a DBS (i still miss it and my heart is still bleeding) and then one must move forward :P
What are you thoughts on a Vantage? I would be giving up a back seat, but could buy a newer car, still have manual (plus and minus) or even consider that sequential auto thing which seems to be the majority of the ones out there.

The Maserati just did not have the level quality materials as the Aston, or maybe even the Jaguar inside. I should revisit what I can get for my money on an XKR...
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 12:57 PM
  #96  
XXXAngelXXX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 129
Likes: 43
From: Stuttgart/Germany
Default

I had both - a manual Vantage V8 and a Sportshift convertible - they are nice but don't compare to the DBS or the XKRS...



The manual V8




The Sportshift Roadster
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 03:39 PM
  #97  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 1,208
From: Boston, USA
Default

Originally Posted by XXXAngelXXX
I had both - a manual Vantage V8 and a Sportshift convertible - they are nice but don't compare to the DBS or the XKRS...
How about compared to regular DB9? What is it about the XKRS that you enjoy the most?
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2016 | 05:45 PM
  #98  
XXXAngelXXX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 129
Likes: 43
From: Stuttgart/Germany
Default

I had a several DB9s as a loaner from my local dealer - they are nice to drive power comes very progressive and smooth right from the start.

The XKRS is a total other thing - the POWER that you can nearly not get on the road, the aggressive look - it is a bit like a BIG boy racer for me
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2016 | 08:56 AM
  #99  
michaelodonnell123's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 806
Likes: 340
From: new jersey
Default

Originally Posted by mosesbotbol
I like the clean look of the XK with large NAV screen. That being said, Jaguar missed a lot of opportunity to make the NAV something cool.

Jaguar did the NAV screen spot on in my opinion, it has just what it needs and none of the nonsense that others include. Keep is simple is my motto.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2016 | 09:12 AM
  #100  
XXXAngelXXX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 129
Likes: 43
From: Stuttgart/Germany
Default

I got an Jaguar XE as a loaner today while my Range Rover is in for service - i quit like the Satnav there so called InControl.....

 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.