XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 ) 1995-1997

Acceleration of the 3.2 X300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2020 | 05:30 PM
  #1  
AL NZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 961
Likes: 353
From: Napier, NZ
Default Acceleration of the 3.2 X300 and XJR6 - comparison

I have just had my gearbox serviced and it is as smooth as butter.
I was heading home, and for once I had my Kiwi 3 OBDII sender unit in the 3.2 instead of the XJR.
I thought I’d try a 0-60mph time. Dry roads, 18’C, standard car apart from the Andy bracket.
recently the OBDII software on my iPhone has updated and it now shows GPS speed as well as vehicle sensor speed. At a steady 60mph/96kmh the ECU thinks it is doing 92kmh. There is the same 4kmh error in my XJR.(perhaps tyre related)

so on the graph shown, I did 0-92km/h in a smidgen over 8 seconds. Not bad, me thought. I had always though it was about 9-9.5 secs but this reflects the lag time of waiting for GPS to catch up when accelerating.

I have done this before on a hotter day in the manual XJR and got a time of about 5.5 secs. On a cooler day with about 80kg of junk removed from the boot/trunk, I would expect to go slightly faster, but I am loathe to thrash the drivetrain, having had a new clutch about 6 months ago.


 

Last edited by AL NZ; Jan 17, 2020 at 01:31 PM. Reason: Added more data
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2020 | 08:54 PM
  #2  
AL NZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 961
Likes: 353
From: Napier, NZ
Default

I have just repeated the exercise in the XJR. (Same road, same temperature 19’C).
I turned off the traction control and aircon.
first run (first graph) was best with a 0-60 mph of 5 seconds. Second run hopeless with far too much wheelspin and the expensive smell of burning money as I deglazed the clutch. Third run I forgot the app was paused so I missed recording what would have been a good time. Fourth run (2nd graph) was good, hitting 75mph in about 8.5 seconds and almost 90mph in 12 secs. (Allowing for ECU thinking 60mph is 92km/h as per first post).
enough ...


 

Last edited by AL NZ; Jan 16, 2020 at 09:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2020 | 01:33 AM
  #3  
Grant Francis's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 28,772
Likes: 11,260
From: Adelaide Stralia
Default

MMMMMM.

The 3.2 is no slouch by any means.

Sweet engine and revs sweetly.

The lack of electricery in the trans is just a bonus for the wallet in my opinion.

I always preferred my 3.2 to the "R", it simply did what it did effortlessly.

 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2020 | 01:47 AM
  #4  
AL NZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 961
Likes: 353
From: Napier, NZ
Default

Originally Posted by Grant Francis
MMMMMM.

The 3.2 is no slouch by any means.

Sweet engine and revs sweetly.

The lack of electricery in the trans is just a bonus for the wallet in my opinion.

I always preferred my 3.2 to the "R", it simply did what it did effortlessly.
the 3.2 is slow off the mark because not much torque, but gets going once in the revs, and wafts along nicely between 60-100mph, almost nicer at speed than the XJR because of the high profile tyres and softer suspension.

makes me wonder what a good XJ12/Double Six would be like, best of both worlds, tons of torque and almost as much bhp, plus ‘plush’
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2020 | 12:06 AM
  #5  
AL NZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 961
Likes: 353
From: Napier, NZ
Default

My rude exhaust..
 
Attached Files
File Type: mov
FullSizeRender.mov (3.89 MB, 34 views)
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2020 | 01:42 AM
  #6  
Steve M's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,215
Likes: 3,739
From: Wiltshire, UK
Default

Rude, but very, very brief!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AL NZ
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
38
May 6, 2024 09:25 AM
AL NZ
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
2
Feb 19, 2018 02:52 PM
dunto1
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
4
Oct 20, 2014 12:06 AM
blackwolf560
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
21
Jun 21, 2012 01:47 PM
benitothebandito711
XJS ( X27 )
8
Feb 5, 2009 10:33 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.