E type ( XK-E ) 1961 - 1975

Triple SU Caburetor Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2014 | 11:20 AM
  #1  
cbj625's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Hartwell, Georgia
Default Triple SU Caburetor Conversion

Can anyone point me to discussion on converting a 1969 (or SII) E-type to triple SU carburetors? I currently have dual SU's. Beyond replacing the manifold, carburetors, and air intake, I do not know what I will need to upgrade (distributor, cams, etc).

A step by step would be great but a few helpful hints will be very welcome...many thanks!

C. Bruce Jones
Hartwell, GA
--
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2014 | 07:26 AM
  #2  
cat_as_trophy's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 1,638
From: Regional NSW, Australia
Default

Greetings Bruce ... from an Australian E-Type Jaguar fan with 35+ years of Series1 love affair. May I suggest you start by reviewing this thread 1969 E-Type - Update to Drivers Car.

There are now more than 30 posts in that thread and I suggest you review all of them as they go to the heart of each of the questions you have asked ... and perhaps some you haven't thought of yet.

For me, the key question starts with the XK head, because several S1a and S11s we have seen imported into Australia from NA as spares have had saloon type setups with M or C heads and cams, smaller valves, either dual SUs like you describe but of smaller bore than for our E's, or even twin Strombergs ... all very, very big disappointments up front that, even with diff changes, were unable to replicate ROW performance:
  • either follow the suggestion to retro-fit a later XJ head with improved cams, valves and airways ... or
  • if you are determined to retain the original era head, at least ensure that it is the genuine straight port S head - originally painted gold;
  • as gold paint is cheap, look deeper than the colour of the head; start by miking both cams for lobe lift and timing.
Yell if you need further info, always check the NA specs and forum advice re later S1, S1a, and especially S11 and S3 E-Types by comparing with the home market spec ... in many performance areas by the later 60s, they were quite different, as you have found. My last piece of advice is to take the opportunity to check with the Jaguar UK Forum also for your year and model ... not only for their home market specs and knowledge, but also as a source of the parts you may require.

I commend you for what you are setting out to do ... you will breathe the roar back into the one Jaguar that deserves it most ... and will reward you most.
Best wishes,
Ken
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2014 | 08:24 AM
  #3  
SNG Barratt USA's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 533
From: Manchester, New Hampshire
Default

We offer a kit to accommodate this conversion. Feel free to give us a call to discuss.
Regards
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 11:50 AM
  #4  
cbj625's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Hartwell, Georgia
Default

Many thanks Ken, My 69 is a pretty car and is mostly restored but I am "hell bent" on squeezing the best possible performance without putting it in racing configuration. I admired these cars when I was about 20 years old and vowed that I would own one some day. When I finally bought one, it was not the beast that I had envisioned. Soon, I found out why...might as well have a governor on it. I believe my car's net hp is less that 200 hp judging by it's performance. I don't have access to a dynamometer so it's just a guess. Non-NA versions boast of 269 hp (gross).

Where can I get the non-NA specs...ie; cam specs, head variation, etc. versus NA...I read something somewhere about rough airways but I can't re-locate that blurb.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2014 | 09:20 PM
  #5  
enderle's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 703
From: Bend, OR
Default Webbers

I thought '68 on had dual Strombergs. Years ago when I had a modified E we used dual 45 CFM side draft Webbers and put in more aggressive cams. Had the rear wheels widened but you had to start slow because it would snap spokes at launch if you were too aggressive.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jagtoes
XK / XKR ( X150 )
100
Apr 22, 2016 07:37 AM
emilime75
XJ XJ12 ( X305 )
4
Oct 19, 2015 09:55 PM
Tally Ho
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
9
Oct 1, 2015 01:49 AM
Nigels420G
Mark V - X 420G
2
Sep 27, 2015 03:48 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.