Symposer Defeat
#21
#22
#24
I suppose you could bypass it and pump the unswitched, unconditioned intake manifold noise to the cabin. It's not something I would do, but we all have our own flavors of foolishness, don't we?
You might get more SC noise with the symposer disabled because it will have less channeled low to midrange noise drowning it out. It really only takes a couple of minutes to disable, and it's completely reversible. What have you got to lose? You might actually like it!
You might get more SC noise with the symposer disabled because it will have less channeled low to midrange noise drowning it out. It really only takes a couple of minutes to disable, and it's completely reversible. What have you got to lose? You might actually like it!
#25
#26
#27
I suppose you could bypass it and pump the unswitched, unconditioned intake manifold noise to the cabin. It's not something I would do, but we all have our own flavors of foolishness, don't we?
You might get more SC noise with the symposer disabled because it will have less channeled low to midrange noise drowning it out. It really only takes a couple of minutes to disable, and it's completely reversible. What have you got to lose? You might actually like it!
You might get more SC noise with the symposer disabled because it will have less channeled low to midrange noise drowning it out. It really only takes a couple of minutes to disable, and it's completely reversible. What have you got to lose? You might actually like it!
#28
Can anyone confirm if there's a physical opening to the cabin at the end of the pipe? In other cars with symposer type systems, I've found that it just shoots sound against a part of the firewall, while still being sealed. If this is the same, then it opens up more interesting options. I can use a fogger if necessary to determine this for sure.
#29
Can anyone confirm if there's a physical opening to the cabin at the end of the pipe? In other cars with symposer type systems, I've found that it just shoots sound against a part of the firewall, while still being sealed. If this is the same, then it opens up more interesting options. I can use a fogger if necessary to determine this for sure.
My disable method blocks the tube and I have checked the condition of the plug after a short span and also after thousands of miles. There is no indication of flow or blocked flow. There is every indication it sounds better
#30
#31
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 8,334
Received 3,146 Likes
on
2,317 Posts
#32
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 8,334
Received 3,146 Likes
on
2,317 Posts
But that could be due to the fact that my hearing is pretty crap, typical age-related loss of hearing of higher pitched tones such as (probably) SC whine.
#33
OK, done about 100 km since under various conditions and speeds, with plenty of WOT action, and I can't hear any change at all. Definitely no detected increase in SC whine.
But that could be due to the fact that my hearing is pretty crap, typical age-related loss of hearing of higher pitched tones such as (probably) SC whine.
But that could be due to the fact that my hearing is pretty crap, typical age-related loss of hearing of higher pitched tones such as (probably) SC whine.
#34
#36
The only time I hear the SC more is when I open the window and in 1st gear cruise at about 3000rpm. I still have my engine cover in place, but without the foam underneath.
EDIT: It wasn't the lack of SC whine that prompted me to do this initially. It was the wrongness of the piped in sound.
Last edited by lizzardo; 11-01-2017 at 08:38 PM.
#38
I think I looked at that but went the other way. Can't remember why though. Maybe some T's in the system? Not really sure at this point. Maybe I'll look again tomorrow, but it's not high on my rather full list.
#40