F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Symposer Defeat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 02-16-2017, 02:21 AM
Misujerr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 915
Received 100 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Aha, I thought so! With the windows closed, it sounded to me like piped in sound, thanks for the verification!
 
  #22  
Old 10-23-2017, 11:28 PM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,374
Received 958 Likes on 717 Posts
Default

Another thread brought this one back to mind.

Has anyone else actually disabled the symposer in this way, or any other? If so, what are your impressions?
 
  #23  
Old 10-24-2017, 12:24 AM
15FTypeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 480
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

I want more supercharger whine. Maybe I need to modify the symposer?
 
  #24  
Old 10-27-2017, 11:36 AM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,374
Received 958 Likes on 717 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 15FTypeR
I want more supercharger whine. Maybe I need to modify the symposer?
I suppose you could bypass it and pump the unswitched, unconditioned intake manifold noise to the cabin. It's not something I would do, but we all have our own flavors of foolishness, don't we?

You might get more SC noise with the symposer disabled because it will have less channeled low to midrange noise drowning it out. It really only takes a couple of minutes to disable, and it's completely reversible. What have you got to lose? You might actually like it!
 
  #25  
Old 10-27-2017, 11:54 AM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada, eh
Posts: 6,987
Received 2,141 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

The biggest and easiest way to get more SC noise is to take the engine cover off. Driving hard also helps.
 
  #26  
Old 10-27-2017, 08:40 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,652 Likes on 3,362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
The biggest and easiest way to get more SC noise is to take the engine cover off..
Helps a bit, but not nearly enough. My Mini on the other hand, just SCREAMS. It actually has an actuated flapper on the airbox that opens over 4000 rpm.
 
  #27  
Old 10-27-2017, 09:11 PM
15FTypeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 480
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lizzardo
I suppose you could bypass it and pump the unswitched, unconditioned intake manifold noise to the cabin. It's not something I would do, but we all have our own flavors of foolishness, don't we?

You might get more SC noise with the symposer disabled because it will have less channeled low to midrange noise drowning it out. It really only takes a couple of minutes to disable, and it's completely reversible. What have you got to lose? You might actually like it!
Good point, less symposer might let me hear more supercharger. Absolutely, some less hazardous sounding variation the first idea is worth looking into also.
 
  #28  
Old 10-28-2017, 01:56 AM
15FTypeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 480
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Can anyone confirm if there's a physical opening to the cabin at the end of the pipe? In other cars with symposer type systems, I've found that it just shoots sound against a part of the firewall, while still being sealed. If this is the same, then it opens up more interesting options. I can use a fogger if necessary to determine this for sure.
 
  #29  
Old 10-28-2017, 10:07 AM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,374
Received 958 Likes on 717 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 15FTypeR
Can anyone confirm if there's a physical opening to the cabin at the end of the pipe? In other cars with symposer type systems, I've found that it just shoots sound against a part of the firewall, while still being sealed. If this is the same, then it opens up more interesting options. I can use a fogger if necessary to determine this for sure.
In the diagram I've seen (https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...5/#post1401294) it appears to be closed. Anything other than that violates the notion of "firewall" and risks letting potentially noxious fumes into the cabin.

My disable method blocks the tube and I have checked the condition of the plug after a short span and also after thousands of miles. There is no indication of flow or blocked flow. There is every indication it sounds better
 
  #30  
Old 10-28-2017, 02:50 PM
15FTypeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 480
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Hmm, to my surprise, it sounds like it passes through the firewall... I suspected this because there is an o-ring seal plus clamps on the associated 'plumbing'. That's a lot of effort to seal something.


 
  #31  
Old 10-28-2017, 04:11 PM
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 8,334
Received 3,146 Likes on 2,317 Posts
Default

I've just done the "symposer defeat", 5 minute job, will report back later (probably tomorrow) on any noise difference once I've been for a decent spin.
 
  #32  
Old 10-29-2017, 04:30 PM
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 8,334
Received 3,146 Likes on 2,317 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OzXFR
I've just done the "symposer defeat", 5 minute job, will report back later (probably tomorrow) on any noise difference once I've been for a decent spin.
OK, done about 100 km since under various conditions and speeds, with plenty of WOT action, and I can't hear any change at all. Definitely no detected increase in SC whine.
But that could be due to the fact that my hearing is pretty crap, typical age-related loss of hearing of higher pitched tones such as (probably) SC whine.
 
  #33  
Old 10-30-2017, 11:30 AM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,374
Received 958 Likes on 717 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OzXFR
OK, done about 100 km since under various conditions and speeds, with plenty of WOT action, and I can't hear any change at all. Definitely no detected increase in SC whine.
But that could be due to the fact that my hearing is pretty crap, typical age-related loss of hearing of higher pitched tones such as (probably) SC whine.
My hearing is pretty badly damaged, but if you can't hear any difference at all, either your hearing is worse than mine, your symposer was never working, or you didn't really get it disabled.
 
  #34  
Old 10-30-2017, 12:43 PM
SVR's Avatar
SVR
SVR is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: CA
Posts: 190
Received 42 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

All this talk about SC whine, but for what it's worthmy SVR has zero audible SC whine, and it doesn't even have an engine cover. No different when it was stock, tuned, or now with VAP catted downpipes as well.

Nothing compared to my AMGs from 10 years ago, be it stock or modified.
 
  #35  
Old 10-30-2017, 01:18 PM
15FTypeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 480
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

I definitely noticed mine was quieter with the 5-minute-defeat but I didn't hear any more from the SC.
 
  #36  
Old 11-01-2017, 08:31 PM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,374
Received 958 Likes on 717 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 15FTypeR
I definitely noticed mine was quieter with the 5-minute-defeat but I didn't hear any more from the SC.
I never noticed more SC whine but it sounds *better* in that front noises come from the front, back noises come from the back. Also, I can hear the exhaust properly.

The only time I hear the SC more is when I open the window and in 1st gear cruise at about 3000rpm. I still have my engine cover in place, but without the foam underneath.

EDIT: It wasn't the lack of SC whine that prompted me to do this initially. It was the wrongness of the piped in sound.
 

Last edited by lizzardo; 11-01-2017 at 08:38 PM.
  #37  
Old 11-03-2017, 10:12 AM
abstruse1's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Has anyone tried plugging the vacuum control line?
 
  #38  
Old 11-05-2017, 12:10 AM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,374
Received 958 Likes on 717 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by abstruse1
Has anyone tried plugging the vacuum control line?
I think I looked at that but went the other way. Can't remember why though. Maybe some T's in the system? Not really sure at this point. Maybe I'll look again tomorrow, but it's not high on my rather full list.
 
  #39  
Old 12-19-2017, 11:45 AM
FR500GT's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 737
Received 153 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

I thought I read on another thread that you could simply pull a "symposer fuse"..no? I can't seem to find it now.
 
  #40  
Old 12-19-2017, 03:54 PM
Kdes's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Found a video of f-type convertible on assembly line. You can clearly see what looks like a “speaker”on the bulkhead. This matches the diagram posted earlier.


Kev

i’ll See if I can find the video link again.
 


Quick Reply: Symposer Defeat



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 AM.