S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

'05 STR Won't Start

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #41  
Old 05-25-2017, 06:55 AM
kr98664's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,392
Received 2,014 Likes on 1,423 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KenAdamson
I think my mechanical fuel pressure gauge might be shot. Well, that and perhaps there is some kind of issue on the right side of the engine (where the schraeder valve is).
Ken, Ken, Ken...

I was gone a few days camping, just me, my beloved wife, and no cell coverage. Upon my return, I had planned to read you'd followed my advice, got the fuel pressure back within specs, and the car started right up. The only thing left was for you to craft a lengthy follow-up singing my praises. You obviously have not been reading from the script.

With the new sensor, your scanner says the fuel pressure is now good. What is the mechanical gauge doing? Did the electronic (scanner) and mechanical gauge readings both change with the new sensor? It's rare, but I'd still triple-check the mechanical gauge reading against something else just to be sure. For example, you can check a tire's pressure (or any convenient source of compressed air) with an ordinary tire gauge. Then check that same pressure with your fuel pressure tester. That's what I've done to make sure my fuel pressure tester is fairly accurate.

After that, I'd guess checking for a spark is next. With 8 separate coils, it's hard to imagine losing all cylinders at once, but definitely check.
 
  #42  
Old 05-25-2017, 10:29 AM
clubairth1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: home
Posts: 9,010
Received 2,313 Likes on 1,818 Posts
Default

Fuel pressure sounds good. Can you answer about the P0193 code?

That one is directly related to the fuel pressure sensor and was the code I got on my 2005 STR when that item failed.
If you changed the fuel pressure sensor that should have fixed the P0193 code.
.
.
.
 
  #43  
Old 05-25-2017, 10:01 PM
KenAdamson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 229
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kr98664
Ken, Ken, Ken...

I was gone a few days camping, just me, my beloved wife, and no cell coverage. Upon my return, I had planned to read you'd followed my advice, got the fuel pressure back within specs, and the car started right up. The only thing left was for you to craft a lengthy follow-up singing my praises. You obviously have not been reading from the script.

With the new sensor, your scanner says the fuel pressure is now good. What is the mechanical gauge doing? Did the electronic (scanner) and mechanical gauge readings both change with the new sensor? It's rare, but I'd still triple-check the mechanical gauge reading against something else just to be sure. For example, you can check a tire's pressure (or any convenient source of compressed air) with an ordinary tire gauge. Then check that same pressure with your fuel pressure tester. That's what I've done to make sure my fuel pressure tester is fairly accurate.

After that, I'd guess checking for a spark is next. With 8 separate coils, it's hard to imagine losing all cylinders at once, but definitely check.
So, last night I swapped in the new FPS and the card did not start. I didn't monkey with codes or anything, until today. I got in the car, pressed the accelerator to the floor and cranked it. After about 5 seconds it stumbled to life and started putting out MASSIVE amounts of smoke.

P0193 is gone. However, I now have:

P0300 - multiple cylinder misfire
P0301
P0302
P0303
P0304
P0305
P0306
P0307
P0308 (every cylinder is misfiring)
P1316
P0445 - Evaporitive Emission Control System Purge Control Valuve Circuit Shorted
P1000 - Powertrain

So, I tried a couple things:

1) A while back I thought my MAF might have been bad (it wasn't - it was the thing that isn't a PCV valve, but everybody calls a PCV valve), so I swapped it for another one. I started getting rich codes immediatly, so I swapped it back and things were better. I put that other MAF back on last week, to get a second opinion, and it was still on today - I swapped back my OEM MAF. Didn't make any difference.

2) I checked the oil. I knew it was going to be contaminated with fuel from all the rich no-start cranking. Well, it is reading about a quart HIGH and reeks of gasoline. So, I need to change the oil posthaste.

I also shot video of all of it. I'll upload it to Youtube and link here.

But, hey - it's running. Badly, but at least - I think - this allows more troubleshooting. I don't know what the deal is with the fuel pressure gauge. I'll try it out on another car and see what it reads and compare to the car's OBD reading from the fuel regulator.
 
  #44  
Old 05-25-2017, 10:09 PM
KenAdamson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 229
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Oh, also - fuel trims are bonkers. Long-term trims: +7%, Short-term Trims: +25%






 
  #45  
Old 05-25-2017, 10:39 PM
kr98664's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,392
Received 2,014 Likes on 1,423 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KenAdamson
After about 5 seconds it stumbled to life and started putting out MASSIVE amounts of smoke.

I checked the oil. I knew it was going to be contaminated with fuel from all the rich no-start cranking. Well, it is reading about a quart HIGH and reeks of gasoline. So, I need to change the oil posthaste.
Progress!

How much have you driven the car? Definitely replace that fuel-thinned oil and then try again. If the car is halfway driveable, you may need to put a few miles on it to blow out the cobwebs.

Fresh oil will help restore normal compression, which may currently be low due to fuel wash. Might even be worth your while to squirt a spoonful of oil into each cylinder through the spark plug holes. Crank it over briefly with the plugs removed to blow out any excess and prevent hydraulic lock.

I wouldn't worry about the misfire codes at the moment. That could be as simple as low compression reducing power output. [Soapbox mode on] Remember, a misfire code doesn't necessarily mean an ignition problem. The code can be set by any problem that reduces power output from a particular cylinder(s), such as low compression, a bad injector, etc. [Soapbox mode off/]
 
  #46  
Old 05-25-2017, 11:45 PM
KenAdamson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 229
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kr98664
Progress!

How much have you driven the car? Definitely replace that fuel-thinned oil and then try again. If the car is halfway driveable, you may need to put a few miles on it to blow out the cobwebs.

Fresh oil will help restore normal compression, which may currently be low due to fuel wash. Might even be worth your while to squirt a spoonful of oil into each cylinder through the spark plug holes. Crank it over briefly with the plugs removed to blow out any excess and prevent hydraulic lock.

I wouldn't worry about the misfire codes at the moment. That could be as simple as low compression reducing power output. [Soapbox mode on] Remember, a misfire code doesn't necessarily mean an ignition problem. The code can be set by any problem that reduces power output from a particular cylinder(s), such as low compression, a bad injector, etc. [Soapbox mode off/]
It's probably driveable. I'm just paranoid about making a mistake and killing it :/ I'll change the oil, tomorrow I think, and drive it around a little.

Here are the vids I shot today after it got started:



 
  #47  
Old 05-26-2017, 07:49 AM
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,257 Likes on 1,842 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kr98664
Might even be worth your while to squirt a spoonful of oil into each cylinder through the spark plug holes. Crank it over briefly with the plugs removed to blow out any excess and prevent hydraulic lock.
Disagree. Cranking the engine repeatedly and dumping oil into the cylinders is most likely what caused the no-start in the first place.
 
  #48  
Old 05-26-2017, 10:04 PM
KenAdamson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 229
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Ok, update time

Changed the oil. No more smoke. I drove it around a bit. Drove it home from where it stranded me, even. Something definitely didn't feel right, but things got gradually better as the ECM learned new trims. I have the following pending faults:

P0172 - System too Rich (Bank 1)
P0175 - System too Rich (Bank 2)
P0300 - Random/Multiple Cylinder Misfire Detected
P0301
P0302
P0307
P0308 - Cylinders 1,2,7,8 Misfire Detected
P0445 - Evaporative Emission Control System Purge Control Valve Circuit Shorted
P1000 - Powertrain
P1316 - Powertrain

After getting home, I let it idle and watched the fuel trims sort themselves out. LTFT is now -3% or so on both banks, STFT is +2% or less on both banks at idle. At 1500 rpm, they are similar, +-3%.

I clearly have a problem with the EVAP system (I have for years), and it's come to a head. I have a smoke machine coming to help me deal with that as well.

Does anybody have a suggestion about how to tackle the P0445?

Thanks, everyone, for your help and guidance!

Ken
 
  #49  
Old 05-26-2017, 10:20 PM
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,257 Likes on 1,842 Posts
Default

The purge control valve ***'y is a common failure.
 
  #50  
Old 05-26-2017, 10:38 PM
KenAdamson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 229
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey
The purge control valve ***'y is a common failure.
Does anyone have a part number for that?
 
  #51  
Old 05-27-2017, 03:33 PM
kr98664's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,392
Received 2,014 Likes on 1,423 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KenAdamson
Ok, update time
I drove it around a bit. Drove it home from where it stranded me, even. Something definitely didn't feel right, but things got gradually better as the ECM learned new trims.

After getting home, I let it idle and watched the fuel trims sort themselves out. LTFT is now -3% or so on both banks, STFT is +2% or less on both banks at idle. At 1500 rpm, they are similar, +-3%



I would hope the behavior will settle down the more you drive it. Remember, you've made a big change to the fuel delivery schedule by getting the rail pressure back in spec. The ECM needs some time to relearn.


Back to that suspect mechanical gauge: I'd suggest just springing for a new one to confirm the rail pressure is now good. It certainly seems better, but there's still a possibility the new sensor is not perfect, or there may also be a wiring fault in the sensor circuit skewing the results. For something as important as this parameter, a good mechanical gauge should bring you peace of mind. Don't trust the scanner reading exclusively. You don't want the ECM issuing improper outputs based on a suspect input.


So do you think the low fuel pressure was the root cause of the no-start, and then possibly aggravated by fuel wash?
 
  #52  
Old 05-28-2017, 12:01 AM
KenAdamson's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 229
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kr98664
I would hope the behavior will settle down the more you drive it. Remember, you've made a big change to the fuel delivery schedule by getting the rail pressure back in spec. The ECM needs some time to relearn.


Back to that suspect mechanical gauge: I'd suggest just springing for a new one to confirm the rail pressure is now good. It certainly seems better, but there's still a possibility the new sensor is not perfect, or there may also be a wiring fault in the sensor circuit skewing the results. For something as important as this parameter, a good mechanical gauge should bring you peace of mind. Don't trust the scanner reading exclusively. You don't want the ECM issuing improper outputs based on a suspect input.


So do you think the low fuel pressure was the root cause of the no-start, and then possibly aggravated by fuel wash?
That's what it feels like. I drove it around some more today, and it's certainly getting better. I still have pending codes, but nothing confirmed to set the MIL.

I'm taking your advice and buying a new gauge (this one is a loaner from a friend, anyway).

Everything seems to be settling down. Now, on to fixing the PITA EVAP system

Thanks!
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.