X-Type ( X400 ) 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Horsepower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:06 PM
Adam Lueb's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicopee, Ma
Posts: 781
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Smile Horsepower

What is the difference between Brake Horsepower and Horsepower? Thanks as always. I know I should know this, but we don't use BHP in the states that much.
 
  #2  
Old 03-24-2011, 03:58 PM
fmracerbob's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sonoma, California
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Same thing. The brake refers to the type of dynometer used to measure the power, it in essence uses a water brake to resist the power output and measures this force. This is the power right at the flywheel. A chassis dynometer will measure the "at the wheel" power which includes the loses due to frinction and resistance in the drive train.
 
  #3  
Old 03-24-2011, 05:40 PM
j_bond's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Posts: 273
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

subtract at least 18% from 231 and you get the approximate 'Wheel' horsepower of the X-Type.
 
  #4  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:10 AM
Cadillac's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planetarium
Posts: 11,380
Received 637 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Brake horsepower should be a British stuff considering Top Gear and resident UK persons use that term that much
 
  #5  
Old 03-25-2011, 06:17 AM
JagXV6's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by j_bond
subtract at least 18% from 231 and you get the approximate 'Wheel' horsepower of the X-Type.

At which wheels, the front or the back? Where does the 18% number come from?
 
  #6  
Old 03-25-2011, 08:23 AM
j_bond's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Posts: 273
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JagXV6
At which wheels, the front or the back? Where does the 18% number come from?
ALL 4 WHEELS.

it is an AWD car.

60% to the rear, 40% to the front power distribution split.

An AWD dyno chassis is utilized to measure this. Or on some vehicles, the driveshaft can be pulled and RWD can be measured. Although I do not think the X-type is setup to do so.....
 
  #7  
Old 03-25-2011, 11:18 AM
Adam Lueb's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicopee, Ma
Posts: 781
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Smile Horsepower

Originally Posted by fmracerbob
Same thing. The brake refers to the type of dynometer used to measure the power, it in essence uses a water brake to resist the power output and measures this force. This is the power right at the flywheel. A chassis dynometer will measure the "at the wheel" power which includes the loses due to frinction and resistance in the drive train.
OK, Thanks, This is something I knew but did not know brake HP was at the flywheel. I had my Cobra tested many years ago and the HP was measured at the back wheels.
 
  #8  
Old 03-25-2011, 11:20 AM
Adam Lueb's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicopee, Ma
Posts: 781
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Smile Horsepower

Originally Posted by j_bond
subtract at least 18% from 231 and you get the approximate 'Wheel' horsepower of the X-Type.
Is that for the 2.5L or the 3.0L I have a 2.5L and I've read it is rated at 195HP. Is this correct? As for that amount of horsepower the car is very peppy. It bogs down a bit around 80mph but gains power above 85 + mph.
 
  #9  
Old 03-25-2011, 11:24 AM
Adam Lueb's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicopee, Ma
Posts: 781
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Smile Horsepower

Originally Posted by JagXV6
At which wheels, the front or the back? Where does the 18% number come from?
I just guessing but I would think at both back wheels as it is AWD? And I do know that there is a lost of HP from the flywheel to the rear end. Oh, when I was looking around for a headlight unit, on one Jaguar dealer site I saw transaxle. Do these cars have transaxles? If so that would explain the excellent handling. Again I should have known this, but I never saw this mentioned in anything I ever read about the car. Thanks.


"Staying alive, oh, oh staying alive."
 
  #10  
Old 03-25-2011, 12:58 PM
ufoz8mycow's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Brake horsepower is the same as the measured flywheel horsepower which is the number that all car manufacturers quote when giving HP figures (no, your 5.0 Mustang doesn't actually have 414hp at the wheels, that's BHP).

WHP (wheel horsepower) is the actual power that your car puts down to the ground through its drive wheels. All drivetrains induce a power loss in getting the power from the engine to the wheels.. Auto transmissions will face a larger power loss than a manual transmission and it varies from car to car. Most auto drivetrains will lose between 15-20% of power by the time it gets to the wheels... So on most automatic 3.0 X Types, depending on how well maintained they are, any mods, etc you are probably looking at a car that is laying down between 185-195whp. Mayyyybe 200whp for some of the guys with free flowing exhausts, intakes, colder plugs, etc.
 
  #11  
Old 03-25-2011, 01:33 PM
stshots's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: U.S. Utah
Posts: 94
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Here's a youtube vid of a chassis dyno'd, slightly modded x-type. About a 60hp loss in the drivetrain

YouTube - Jaguar X Type 3.0 ltr with Quad exhaust Dyno Run
 
  #12  
Old 03-25-2011, 01:57 PM
j_bond's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Posts: 273
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

As you can see from the Dyno results on the curve, the exhaust
MAYBE' added 3hp and 2ft lbs torque. BUT, like all dyno runs, you can run the EXACT SAME setup twice and have a variation of numbers by that much. more than likely an axle-back exhaust adds none. I saw ZERO number changes until I did a full custom catback with high-flow cats, and ECU Re-map. I'm not sure why they didn't produce a full catback setup for the X-Type, it seems the demand is fairly decent....
 
  #13  
Old 03-25-2011, 01:58 PM
j_bond's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Posts: 273
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

....I can't wait to install my new quad-tips I found...
 
  #14  
Old 03-25-2011, 02:11 PM
sport30's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 216
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Adam Adam Adam - honestly have you not heard of google?
Click this:

Google
 
  #15  
Old 03-25-2011, 02:46 PM
stshots's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: U.S. Utah
Posts: 94
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by j_bond
As you can see from the Dyno results on the curve, the exhaust
MAYBE' added 3hp and 2ft lbs torque. BUT, like all dyno runs, you can run the EXACT SAME setup twice and have a variation of numbers by that much. more than likely an axle-back exhaust adds none. I saw ZERO number changes until I did a full custom catback with high-flow cats, and ECU Re-map. I'm not sure why they didn't produce a full catback setup for the X-Type, it seems the demand is fairly decent....
I'm not sure it was a before and after on run 1 vs. run 2. I think it was just a variance in the two.

I agree with you on the catback system. There are all kinds of horsepower robbing things in the way. I'd love one. I'd love highflow cats too for that matter.
 
  #16  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:09 PM
j_bond's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Posts: 273
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
  #17  
Old 03-25-2011, 08:46 PM
dennis black's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: connecticut
Posts: 1,545
Received 392 Likes on 289 Posts
Default

trust me you will not get any horse power from any exhaust ..unless the car is turbo
but it may sound good
 
  #18  
Old 03-26-2011, 04:32 AM
BuckMR2's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,921
Received 63 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

AWD saps the power
Mine was rolling roaded at 241BHP and only 182 BHP at the wheels (fully serviced etc etc)
Watch the rolling road vid on You Tube with results....
YouTube - Jaguar X Type 3.0 ltr with Quad exhaust Dyno Run
 
  #19  
Old 03-26-2011, 08:47 AM
Adam Lueb's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicopee, Ma
Posts: 781
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Smile HP

Originally Posted by sport30
Adam Adam Adam - honestly have you not heard of google?
Click this:

Google
I am 65 years old and I have enough trouble trying to use email and Microsoft word. Google is great, but I don't think about these places especially when this forum has such smart people on it who probably know more than Google.
 
  #20  
Old 03-28-2011, 12:58 PM
stshots's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: U.S. Utah
Posts: 94
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BuckMR2
AWD saps the power
Mine was rolling roaded at 241BHP and only 182 BHP at the wheels (fully serviced etc etc)
Watch the rolling road vid on You Tube with results....
Nice Buck! I found and posted your vid earlier in the thread. . Did you have any other mods on your x besides the exhaust on this run? Did you run on the dyno prior to installation too?

Good vewing.
 


Quick Reply: Horsepower



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.