XF and XFR ( X250 ) 2007 - 2015

replacing rotors and sensors when pads are low?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 04:43 PM
  #21  
10 XF Premium's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 675
Likes: 126
From: Davenport, Iowa
Default

Heavy right foot = traction control using rear brake to keep the rear tires from spinning.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 07:36 PM
  #22  
sparkenzap's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 1,068
From: atlanta ga
Default

Must be a REAL heavy foot!
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 07:41 PM
  #23  
10 XF Premium's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 675
Likes: 126
From: Davenport, Iowa
Default

I thought so too with my 2010 Premium. Now with my 2013 SC, the traction control is always working. The back tires just spin so easily.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 08:44 PM
  #24  
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 9,030
Likes: 3,664
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Default

I have read elsewhere that the EBD system and to a lesser extent the DSC system have a bit of "anti-dive" programmed into them, such that under moderate to heavy braking much more braking force than on 'normal' cars is directed to the rear brakes. However I couldn't find any mention of this in the Workshop Manual. Combine lots of this type of driving (fairly heavy on the brakes) with the soft as butter OEM brake pads could explain the rear pads wearing out so fast. Conversely, under really heavy braking, at or near the threshold of ABS activating, the EBD system sends up to 90% of the braking force to the front brakes.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 08:43 AM
  #25  
DPK's Avatar
DPK
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 533
From: OKC, OK
Default

I was told a while back by my Jag Tech buddy, that while I was reading here that Rear brakes wore faster than the fronts, he said it was because the brake biasing under normal stopping conditions is favored to the rears to help alleviate nose dive while stopping...Makes sense
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 11:48 AM
  #26  
phu5ion's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 27
Likes: 3
From: Golden, CO
Default

Originally Posted by sparkenzap
Must be a REAL heavy foot!
LoL Maybe... Would be even worse with torque vectoring.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2016 | 08:39 PM
  #27  
Cherry_560sel's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 97
From: Plano, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by DPK
I was told a while back by my Jag Tech buddy, that while I was reading here that Rear brakes wore faster than the fronts, he said it was because the brake biasing under normal stopping conditions is favored to the rears to help alleviate nose dive while stopping...Makes sense
From my time driving the XF, this comment validates some initial reactions. I noticed the nose seems to stay level during braking. Diversion to the rear brakes seems a plausible explanation to this sensation.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2016 | 02:22 PM
  #28  
leadfoot4's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 557
Default

Originally Posted by DPK
I was told a while back by my Jag Tech buddy, that while I was reading here that Rear brakes wore faster than the fronts, he said it was because the brake biasing under normal stopping conditions is favored to the rears to help alleviate nose dive while stopping...Makes sense
That seems to make sense, as I had to replace the brakes 4 months ago, on my wife's 24,000 mile (at the time) '09 XF. I could see that the rears were SIGNIFICANTLY more worn than the fronts, but I replaced all 4 rotors and pairs of pads.


I went with Beck Arnley replacement rotors and Powerstop ceramic pads. So far, so good. Cost for all the parts, from Rock Auto, including shipping, was just under $400.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mad_Russian
XJ40 ( XJ81 )
4
Apr 14, 2022 09:48 PM
Richv8s
F-Type ( X152 )
320
May 26, 2016 01:38 PM
Quicktruck
XF and XFR ( X250 )
5
Feb 1, 2016 07:41 AM
Johnken
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
6
Jan 24, 2016 02:16 PM
giancarlo
F-Type ( X152 )
1
Jan 21, 2016 07:04 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 AM.