XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 ) 1995-1997

Can it be true?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 03:00 PM
  #1  
FlyingD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Herefordshire, UK
Default Can it be true?

Hi All
I'm currently driving a 1.6 automatic rover cabriolet, but am looking to change. I've had 4 litre XJ40s in the past, but fuel economy is becoming important these days, so i want something that isn't much worse than my current rover.

I've noted the following figures claimed for the X300 3.2 on the autotrader website in the UK:
Fuel consumption (urban) 19.8 mpg
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 37.7 mpg
Fuel consumption (combined) 31 mpg

And this is what the same site says for my rover:
Fuel consumption (urban) 26.5 mpg
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 40.2 mpg
Fuel consumption (combined) 30.3 mpg

Looking at the combined figures, can they really be this close?

I know that my Rover does 30mpg in the real world. What are people getting in their 3.2 Jags? I'm mostly on country roads cruising at about 55mph, with some town and hill driving too.

If these Jag figures are even close to true, I think i know what I might be buying next!
Thanks
Richard
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 03:17 PM
  #2  
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,542
Likes: 2,544
From: Crewe, England
Default

The Jaguar 3.2 AJ-16 engine is a wonderful, reliable, unit, but it ain't made for economy. Some years ago, I used a local tyre place where the father founder of the present owner had a new X300 3.2, and only pootled around the Nantwich area in it (being elderly). I gather he got around 20 mpg.

If you want the Jaguar, buy it, but it is not going to have the same costs as your Rover; they will be higher. You have to be realistic. I know what I would rather have though, and it wouldn't be the Rover !
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 03:51 AM
  #3  
speedyxjs's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 5
From: Seaford, East Sussex
Default

I get about 19mpg round town on short journeys and around 30mpg on a long motorway run.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 07:48 AM
  #4  
CatoBT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 3
From: Svelvik, Norway
Thumbs up I do think the Jaguar is ok on the fuel

This thread handles the 3.2, I know, but I just want to say that my 4.0 uses on average 13.7 litres/100 kilometers, which as far as I can say is not bad. (18 mpg according to this calculator: http://www.pege.org/fuel/convert.htm

Both my Chrysler Grand Voy (15l/100km=15 mpg) and my Porsche 928 (18l/100km = 13 mpg) spend A LOT more than that (my Merc 200 CDi can not be used to compare these. It is after all a diesel).

I'm not familiar with the mpg figures (sorry) so I don't know if the figures in my examle is correct. Also please note that the car has been used in town/city ONLY, so the fuel cosumption when driving on motorways should be a lot less. On Saturday I will found out, going 400 kilometres to my friends wedding.

Brgds

Cato
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Johnken
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
11
Apr 8, 2018 10:21 AM
jagtoes
XK / XKR ( X150 )
100
Apr 22, 2016 07:37 AM
prettydaim
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
4
Nov 12, 2015 08:05 PM
k-man
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
15
Oct 5, 2015 08:09 AM
redgear
XJS ( X27 )
1
Sep 26, 2015 07:21 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 PM.