XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Rev Limiter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 08:58 AM
  #1  
SteveM's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 693
Likes: 100
From: NY
Default Rev Limiter?

When does the rev limiter cut in on a 99 XJR? Is it at 6150 rpm or a little later?
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 09:54 AM
  #2  
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,878
Likes: 1,424
From: Sunny Southport UK
Default

I thought it was 5900 on S/C engines?
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #3  
SteveM's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 693
Likes: 100
From: NY
Default

Definitely not 5900. The factory numbers were 370 hp @ 6150 rpm so I'm assuming that it revs to at least 6150.
When I did my dyno runs, they ran it to 6050 with no problem. I want to know how high I can run the rpm on the dyno before the rev limiter kicks in.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 10:51 PM
  #4  
Kansas99XJ8's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 18
From: Kansas
Default

My XJ8 coughed a bit as the rev limiter kicked in when I left in 2nd to about 7200.
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 12:48 AM
  #5  
QuadManiac's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 908
Likes: 89
From: San Diego, CA
Default

If peak power is at 6150, one can assume that it's somewhat above that. This makes Kansas's 7200 sound reasonable. The shifts want to happen such that peak power is somewhere near halfway between just shifted and about to shift again. This maximizes average power.
 

Last edited by QuadManiac; Aug 27, 2010 at 12:51 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 01:19 AM
  #6  
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,070
From: Europe
Default

The engine revs until about 6200 but the torque converter doesn't lockup at wot. So when the dyno man calibrates the rpm by having the engine rev at a constant speed/constant power, they record the rpm in locked condition. At full power the RPM shown on the dyno will be lower than the actual engine speed.
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 08:23 PM
  #7  
QuadManiac's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 908
Likes: 89
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by avos
The engine revs until about 6200 but the torque converter doesn't lockup at wot. So when the dyno man calibrates the rpm by having the engine rev at a constant speed/constant power, they record the rpm in locked condition. At full power the RPM shown on the dyno will be lower than the actual engine speed.

Are you suggesting that the dyno calculates RPM from rear wheel speed?

Otherwise, if they're looking at spark via an inductive pickup, or plugged into the OBD and reading RPM digitally, engine RPM is RPM, regardless of what the tranny is doing.

Certainly if the TC is not locked, the tranny INPUT SHAFT rotation rate will be lower than engine RPM... but does that have anything to do with torque/power at the rear wheels relative to engine RPM measurement, other than a loss component?
 

Last edited by QuadManiac; Aug 27, 2010 at 08:30 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2010 | 12:45 AM
  #8  
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,070
From: Europe
Default

Seldom seen a dyno operator use the ODBII signals, and I guess getting a spark signal on our cars would be somewhat cumbersome, as for most cars (the older 4.0 ones) you would need to take of covers which takes time.

The dyno measures the power, that has nothing to do with the RPM indication, but when the dyno software then also wants to calculate engine power, then these numbers will be even more off if they use the wrong rpm.
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2010 | 09:20 AM
  #9  
SteveM's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 693
Likes: 100
From: NY
Default

The dyno operator actually took off the spark plug covers and measured the spark signal.

That's after he looked under the hood and asked, "Where the hell are the spark plugs?"
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 03:29 AM
  #10  
QuadManiac's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 908
Likes: 89
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by avos
Seldom seen a dyno operator use the ODBII signals, and I guess getting a spark signal on our cars would be somewhat cumbersome, as for most cars (the older 4.0 ones) you would need to take of covers which takes time.

The dyno measures the power, that has nothing to do with the RPM indication, but when the dyno software then also wants to calculate engine power, then these numbers will be even more off if they use the wrong rpm.

Actually, the dynomometer measures only torque. The subsequent power is calculated from this torque times RPM times a conversion constant... so if engine RPM is not known accurately, power at the rear wheels can still be calculated, but not related to any engine RPM, only to effective vehicle speed instead (or transmission input shaft RPM using drivetrain ratios).
 

Last edited by QuadManiac; Aug 29, 2010 at 03:41 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 01:14 AM
  #11  
GerryXJR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
From: Syracuse NY
Default

And the answer is ?
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 01:22 AM
  #12  
XJR-99's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 878
Likes: 324
From: Europe
Default

I have hit the limiter a few times when rev with 2nd gear. I think it's 6200-6300rpm. If using D, it changes at 6K.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 01:49 AM
  #13  
GerryXJR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
From: Syracuse NY
Default

Originally Posted by XJR-99
I have hit the limiter a few times when rev with 2nd gear. I think it's 6200-6300rpm. If using D, it changes at 6K.

.
Thats kinda what i was hoping, i was a bit worried it might be dipping into the low 7's and i wouldnt be very comfortable with that...

I'm very confident in the strength of this engine, but on the other hand i kinda need to know there is a safe guard so it dosent implode...

and that the limiter is well within the safety level on the R's...

Thanks for the info
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 04:20 PM
  #14  
Red October's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 586
Likes: 243
From: Merseyside, United Kingdom
Default

From Jaguar's Technical Guides, the supercharged engine is rev-limited to 6200rpm and the normally-aspirated engines are rev-limited to 6950rpm.

The supercharged engines have a noticeably lower rev limit in order to prevent the supercharger from overspeeding beyond it's safe design limits with the stock pulley sizes-the Eaton unit also becomes noticeably more inefficient if the rotational speed rises too high.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carl purchase
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
6
Oct 14, 2015 06:14 PM
JTC3400
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
5
Sep 29, 2015 05:03 PM
Mark SF
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
4
Sep 28, 2015 01:51 PM
yarpos
Australia - Victoria / Tasmania
0
Sep 27, 2015 06:14 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 AM.