XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Shocking crash test footage for X308

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2017 | 04:35 AM
  #41  
Highhorse's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,936
Likes: 1,928
From: Trying to escape Central Florida
Default

Something we have here in the States is the requirement a vehicle sit at a certain height to assure a hopeful bumper to bumper collision, should it happen. Thus one reason why certain vehicles from other countries are outlawed from entry. I don't know what Europe's laws dictate, I would like to find out, but from the bus video, there is doubt on this end.
The thing with US bumper standards are these custom vehicles that are bagged or altered...I don't believe the insurers will pay out if this is determined, thus leaving you with the cost.
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2018 | 12:21 PM
  #42  
RandyS's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 579
From: TN
Default

Todays cars are made to destroy the car (crumple zones) and save the occupants. That said, I prefer "The Duchess" (2003 Vanden Plas) in any accident with a newer vehicle. Their crumple zones will give way to my hard set frame, and I will drive away while they get towed away in most cases. (As can be seen by the many and varied videos showing impacts in the test crash scenarios.) Personally, I rather like the fact that Coventry kept the XJ40 base frame for so long

Driving at highway speeds into a parked 18 wheeler aside, the X308 series is sturdy and very well made. I am certain there are many different opinions, just as there are different cases without number, but arguments without specific proofs are like today's cars, they crumple without merit.

RandyS
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2018 | 06:41 AM
  #43  
yeldogt's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 344
From: NE
Default

Love watching the crash tests -- especially ones from the insurance institute. Had access to records years ago -- the overall record for the XJ was always good when looking at injuries. It's hard to take out some variables. My guess would be the XJ having very few roll over injuries. Pickup trucks and SUV's have outsized rollover -- off road (in a ditch) injuries ... they can't really separate them out. Frame cars also telegraph energy to the cabin .. not good.

If you watch the chevy crash the one with the the old and new sedan -- it's really amazing how the safety cage stays together.

When Ford redesigned for the introduction of the X300 .. The body shell was both stronger and easier to manufacturer (less panels and more robots).
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2018 | 08:36 PM
  #44  
KipnKnox's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 97
Likes: 8
From: Knoxville
Default

Originally Posted by Stu 1986
I found the photo of the XJR that I mentioned in an earlier comment. You can see the rear end further up the road. If I recall this accident happened at 150mph.


That is really hard to look at. I’ll never have my car up to anywhere near that speed even if it will do it.
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 PM.