XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

MotorWeek Drives the 1987 Jaguar XJ-S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-29-2017, 06:48 PM
Johnny Mayday's Avatar
JagForums Town Crier
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 612
Received 154 Likes on 103 Posts
Default MotorWeek Drives the 1987 Jaguar XJ-S

Personally, even when it was really the only game in town, I always thought Motor Week was kind of dorky, and John Davis' delivery was way overwrought. But I was still stoked that the HP writers dug up this old XJS test... Is it me, or did Davis get hammier as the show went on? He looks pretty young here...

 
The following users liked this post:
Robbo D (12-01-2020)
  #2  
Old 06-29-2017, 07:14 PM
BradsCat's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: VA
Posts: 789
Received 322 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

yep, he got hammier and cornier. Almost to the point that the show was irrelevant. If I wanted to listen to a commercial for a car I would just watch tv or look at a magazine. Not a lot of objectivity and the grading criteria focused on inconsequential things to the average guy.

Still I liked this old edition since I have an '87.

Story says the car had 262 hp with 290 ft lbs torque. On my car I have removed the dual cat's and replaced them with a single larger volume unit on each side as well as removed the resonators. I wonder what that did to my hp by allowing it to breathe easier, less back pressure. At some point I'd consider replacing the stock air cleaner/breathers with a Growler style setup to allow better air flow on the intake.
 
The following users liked this post:
Johnny Mayday (06-30-2017)
  #3  
Old 06-30-2017, 05:55 PM
Johnny Mayday's Avatar
JagForums Town Crier
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 612
Received 154 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BradsCat
yep, he got hammier and cornier. Almost to the point that the show was irrelevant. If I wanted to listen to a commercial for a car I would just watch tv or look at a magazine. Not a lot of objectivity and the grading criteria focused on inconsequential things to the average guy.

Still I liked this old edition since I have an '87.

Story says the car had 262 hp with 290 ft lbs torque. On my car I have removed the dual cat's and replaced them with a single larger volume unit on each side as well as removed the resonators. I wonder what that did to my hp by allowing it to breathe easier, less back pressure. At some point I'd consider replacing the stock air cleaner/breathers with a Growler style setup to allow better air flow on the intake.

Ha ha! Way "hammier and cornier." It was kid of hard to take him seriously in the later episodes.
 
  #4  
Old 07-01-2017, 03:55 PM
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Posts: 7,362
Received 1,231 Likes on 939 Posts
Default

still and all, it was the 1st TV car show that drove and had opinions about them!

times change and people change, we all will.

my father said that rock&roll music would never amount to anything!
boyoh, was he ever wrong.
 
  #5  
Old 07-01-2017, 05:50 PM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BradsCat
Story says the car had 262 hp with 290 ft lbs torque. On my car I have removed the dual cat's and replaced them with a single larger volume unit on each side as well as removed the resonators. I wonder what that did to my hp by allowing it to breathe easier, less back pressure. At some point I'd consider replacing the stock air cleaner/breathers with a Growler style setup to allow better air flow on the intake.
The Aussie version is quoted at 284hp and 320ftlbs with cats, I do not know what all the differences are but 20hp and 30ftlbs is there easily. I suspect ignition timing and maybe fueling as well. We did not get the air pump and those restrictive cats in the down pipes.
 
  #6  
Old 11-30-2020, 10:54 PM
Xjeffs's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 321
Received 162 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

I just saw this video pop up on youtube. I guess in 87 it was a pretty good car.
 
The following users liked this post:
ronbros (12-01-2020)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.