XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

MotorWeek Drives the 1987 Jaguar XJ-S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2017 | 06:48 PM
  #1  
Johnny Mayday's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
JagForums Town Crier
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 612
Likes: 155
From: Seattle, WA
Default MotorWeek Drives the 1987 Jaguar XJ-S

Personally, even when it was really the only game in town, I always thought Motor Week was kind of dorky, and John Davis' delivery was way overwrought. But I was still stoked that the HP writers dug up this old XJS test... Is it me, or did Davis get hammier as the show went on? He looks pretty young here...

 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2017 | 07:14 PM
  #2  
BradsCat's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 916
Likes: 389
From: VA
Default

yep, he got hammier and cornier. Almost to the point that the show was irrelevant. If I wanted to listen to a commercial for a car I would just watch tv or look at a magazine. Not a lot of objectivity and the grading criteria focused on inconsequential things to the average guy.

Still I liked this old edition since I have an '87.

Story says the car had 262 hp with 290 ft lbs torque. On my car I have removed the dual cat's and replaced them with a single larger volume unit on each side as well as removed the resonators. I wonder what that did to my hp by allowing it to breathe easier, less back pressure. At some point I'd consider replacing the stock air cleaner/breathers with a Growler style setup to allow better air flow on the intake.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2017 | 05:55 PM
  #3  
Johnny Mayday's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
JagForums Town Crier
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 612
Likes: 155
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by BradsCat
yep, he got hammier and cornier. Almost to the point that the show was irrelevant. If I wanted to listen to a commercial for a car I would just watch tv or look at a magazine. Not a lot of objectivity and the grading criteria focused on inconsequential things to the average guy.

Still I liked this old edition since I have an '87.

Story says the car had 262 hp with 290 ft lbs torque. On my car I have removed the dual cat's and replaced them with a single larger volume unit on each side as well as removed the resonators. I wonder what that did to my hp by allowing it to breathe easier, less back pressure. At some point I'd consider replacing the stock air cleaner/breathers with a Growler style setup to allow better air flow on the intake.

Ha ha! Way "hammier and cornier." It was kid of hard to take him seriously in the later episodes.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2017 | 03:55 PM
  #4  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

still and all, it was the 1st TV car show that drove and had opinions about them!

times change and people change, we all will.

my father said that rock&roll music would never amount to anything!
boyoh, was he ever wrong.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2017 | 05:50 PM
  #5  
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 2,583
From: Vic Australia
Default

Originally Posted by BradsCat
Story says the car had 262 hp with 290 ft lbs torque. On my car I have removed the dual cat's and replaced them with a single larger volume unit on each side as well as removed the resonators. I wonder what that did to my hp by allowing it to breathe easier, less back pressure. At some point I'd consider replacing the stock air cleaner/breathers with a Growler style setup to allow better air flow on the intake.
The Aussie version is quoted at 284hp and 320ftlbs with cats, I do not know what all the differences are but 20hp and 30ftlbs is there easily. I suspect ignition timing and maybe fueling as well. We did not get the air pump and those restrictive cats in the down pipes.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2020 | 10:54 PM
  #6  
Xjeffs's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 322
Likes: 163
From: Iowa
Default

I just saw this video pop up on youtube. I guess in 87 it was a pretty good car.
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.