XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Feel the need to vent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:38 PM
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,341
Received 537 Likes on 400 Posts
Default Feel the need to vent

Just got dissed from the more prestigious newer gen XK forum. I occasionally browse over there just to see what those guys think of the latest generation cars in anticipation of one day (if/when I get tired of my 2005) I might consider a used newer gen. What a world of difference between this area and that one. I probably was out of line adding my $0.02 to a thread complaining why the XKR is only rated at 4.4 seconds 0-60 instead of 4.0. An entirely different stratosphere of discussion goes on over there.

Guess I will try to keep my nose over here where it belongs.

Doug
 
  #2  
Old 02-07-2012, 12:26 AM
mjlaris's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 1,079
Received 182 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

They can have their X150s, I think the X100s have more true Jaguar soul. The X150s, while technologically advanced has lost the style and elegance that has always been part of a Jaguar and that's my $0.02 worth! You are appreciated over here; those guys can all consume feces and make canine utterances at the lunar orb.

Mark
 
  #3  
Old 02-07-2012, 12:42 AM
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,341
Received 537 Likes on 400 Posts
Default

That cracks me up--good one!!! The guys over here are more regular types. Too many over there seem to be of the "hey look at how much disposable money I have to spend"-types.


Doug
 
  #4  
Old 02-07-2012, 12:44 AM
direng's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 192
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Not your best post Mark so I will return to the XJ40 Forum.
 
  #5  
Old 02-07-2012, 01:02 AM
mjlaris's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 1,079
Received 182 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

I just read that thread; you must have really hit a nerve Doug. I have to agree with you though. A Jaguar is not a dragster, it's a Grand Tourer. If the guy wanted a dragster, he shouldn't have bought a Grand Tourer. Speaking for myself, I wanted a GT, which is why I bought an XKR.

Mark
 
  #6  
Old 02-07-2012, 03:26 AM
GGG's Avatar
GGG
GGG is online now
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Durham, UK
Posts: 120,439
Received 16,790 Likes on 12,164 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeismicGuy
Just got dissed from the more prestigious newer gen XK forum..............Guess I will try to keep my nose over here where it belongs.

Doug
He certainly got very excited. His temper goes from 0-60 in less than 4 seconds even if nothing else does.

Graham
 
  #7  
Old 02-07-2012, 04:59 AM
plums's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: on-the-edge
Posts: 9,733
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,610 Posts
Default

Maybe XKRacer or bfsgross could wander over with some time slips
 
  #8  
Old 02-07-2012, 07:16 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,530
Received 4,274 Likes on 2,811 Posts
Default

I know where I belong. Both of our Jaguars are highway cruisers, not track performers. I will never even think about pretending that they are anything else....
 
  #9  
Old 02-07-2012, 07:40 AM
The Coupe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,294
Received 369 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by plums
Maybe XKRacer or bfsgross could wander over with some time slips

Oh, now THAT would a fun thread to follow!
 
  #10  
Old 02-07-2012, 09:21 AM
cohibarandy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 260
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Guess those guys over there think they're "Special" huh?
 
  #11  
Old 02-07-2012, 10:05 AM
XKRacer's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 576 Likes on 475 Posts
Default

I did have a read.......... Did get a bit defensive didn't he....... Not sure I would worry about the 0-60 time myself, if you ever went to the strip on a RWYB day you will get embarrassed very easily. Not sure on 1/4 times for the 5.0ltr, a well tuned X100 XKR would see high 12s, a very well tuned might get 11s, it is the weight that lets the XK down, if you could lose plenty of weight like I have done in my track car you might even do better. I will take all of my XKs on the strip one day just for giggles
 
  #12  
Old 02-07-2012, 10:16 AM
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,341
Received 537 Likes on 400 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjlaris
I just read that thread; you must have really hit a nerve Doug. I have to agree with you though. A Jaguar is not a dragster, it's a Grand Tourer. If the guy wanted a dragster, he shouldn't have bought a Grand Tourer. Speaking for myself, I wanted a GT, which is why I bought an XKR.

Mark

I guess my post over there was taken as some kind of sarcastic wise-*** remark by some interloper from "the other side of the tracks". Either the specific point I was trying to make was misunderstood by them or I did not make myself clear enough. I was not complaining that it would be nice to get more oomph out of the car. We all want to do that whether we own a Honda or a Ferrari. Look at any of the car forums and there is always discussion on what can be done to get a few more horsepower from the engine (basically, guys will be guys and same for some gals).

But it is quite another thing to buy a car that advertises itself as 4.4 seconds 0-60 and then complain why isn't it 4 seconds. It is what it is and that's all there is. Go ahead and add tweaks to get it to 4 seconds but don't complain that when the specs clearly advertise 4.4 seconds you are not getting 4 and start asking why not. Am I making sense here?

The broader observation is that "over there" is fundamentally a different demographic than "over here". My impression of our section is that basically we are a bunch of working stiffs who do okay and have enough money to be able to afford a used piece or rolling art that really costs not that much more than a nicely loaded Honda. Over there you get guys who drop $100K on a new XKR and then drop another $20K on a body kit or other mods. Basically we are all "enthusiasts" but we over here are of more the "grease under the fingernails type" versus the "green falling out of your pockets" type.

Doug
 
  #13  
Old 02-07-2012, 10:33 AM
JimC64's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland UK
Posts: 47,303
Received 9,005 Likes on 4,113 Posts
Default

Name:  car01.jpg
Views: 41
Size:  19.3 KB

Ok guys....it is what is is and Doug walked away and the situation was / is difused.

I had written a long post here, then thought better of it and deleted it all!

Simply put, no matter what we are ALL part of the Jag family, thats from the guy with the £100k car who has a Jag as part of his "fleet" to the guy who has just bought a £2k car with lots of issues, but hey, its a Jaaaaag.

The "them and us" philosophy has never crept in here and I don't intend to let it now
 
The following 5 users liked this post by JimC64:
Jag69 (02-07-2012), Norri (02-07-2012), SeismicGuy (02-07-2012), SPIJohn (02-07-2012), The Coupe (02-07-2012)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hoodun
XJS ( X27 )
26
10-06-2015 08:34 PM
Delta66
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
3
10-04-2015 05:40 PM
John Fox
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
5
09-30-2015 03:17 PM
the guardian
X-Type ( X400 )
2
09-25-2015 03:06 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Feel the need to vent



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 AM.