Ford owned not Ford built.
#1
#3
#4
Well, Ford owned and many Ford parts. Check the wiring harnesses on the taillights for an example. If the Taurus-like steering wheel buttons weren't enough!
I explain it as a positive. "Doesn't it break down all the time?" No, silly fool, but thanks for keeping the prices depressed for me with that mindset. Ford owned them during this period, that's why they still work today and are as reliable as they are...
Oh, and Ford didn't take the bailout. Ford saved Jaguar. All hail Ford. I went there.
I explain it as a positive. "Doesn't it break down all the time?" No, silly fool, but thanks for keeping the prices depressed for me with that mindset. Ford owned them during this period, that's why they still work today and are as reliable as they are...
Oh, and Ford didn't take the bailout. Ford saved Jaguar. All hail Ford. I went there.
Last edited by Sentinelist; 07-11-2014 at 12:05 AM.
#7
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,255 Likes
on
1,840 Posts
I usually reply 'only if it doesn't catch fire first' and sometimes add that it usually runs just long enough to get to the shop for another $1000 repair. Sure gets some strange looks and helps keeps the cars affordable for us cheap guys. I'm counting on everyone here to do their duty.
Please do NOT tell people the truth that these cars are just a reliable as anything else on the road.
Please do NOT tell people the truth that these cars are just a reliable as anything else on the road.
Trending Topics
#9
#10
Actually the Ford version (3.9L V8 used in the Ford Tbird and Lincoln LS) was much more reliable than the Jaguar version (4.0L) as it did not have the nikasil cylinder coating that was eaten-up by high sulfur fuel and caused a bunch of Jaguar engines to have to be replaced under warranty. Also the Ford engine had no cam timing chain tensioner or water pump failures like the 1997-2002 Jaguar V8's had.
#11
Right? This is only the second Ford I've owned. First one was a 69 GT Torino.
Last edited by Loxmth; 07-11-2014 at 04:34 PM.
#12
Actually the Ford version (3.9L V8 used in the Ford Tbird and Lincoln LS) was much more reliable than the Jaguar version (4.0L) as it did not have the nikasil cylinder coating that was eaten-up by high sulfur fuel and caused a bunch of Jaguar engines to have to be replaced under warranty. Also the Ford engine had no cam timing chain tensioner or water pump failures like the 1997-2002 Jaguar V8's had.
#13
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 116,752
Received 6,253 Likes
on
5,453 Posts
#15
#16
#18
#19
Since auto manufactures reached into the modern day style of building cars, hundreds of parts on most all cars are piece mealed out to other companies for production. Although a Jaguar may have items with-in the car that has another name __in our case Ford___ the parts are manufactured to Jaguars spects and thus are in fact Jaguar parts. Some of these parts may in fact be used on some Ford cars and other makes.
If one wants to criticise Jaguar and belittle the Jaguar name on their car, so be it. But for me, just because a few wires in the back and maybe a programable box under the dash has a Ford emplem on it, Ford, or any other car brand never had an XK8 and has never produced a car as beautiful as it is.
Jaguar engineers designed and built the new Jaguar V8 and when Ford bought the company, they wanted to use a Ford built engine used on their other cars, but none of the Ford engines would fit the bill, could not produce the horsepower and other things Jaguar wouldn't agree to, and so the pure Jaguar engines were agreed upon and thus are in our cars. I read somewhere in one of my Jaguar books that the only "Off Shelf" Ford item that was used on the XK8 engine was a Ford oil pan plug.
People are funny. The Ford name has always been the butt-in of many jokes, but the fact is, if it hadn't been for FORD, I doubt the car industry would be where it is today. Ford today is building some of the prettiest top in cars on the road to. I often wondered why people don't worry about the German influence on our cars---drive trains etc. hummmm?
Chuck
05/XJ8L & XK8 Conv
If one wants to criticise Jaguar and belittle the Jaguar name on their car, so be it. But for me, just because a few wires in the back and maybe a programable box under the dash has a Ford emplem on it, Ford, or any other car brand never had an XK8 and has never produced a car as beautiful as it is.
Jaguar engineers designed and built the new Jaguar V8 and when Ford bought the company, they wanted to use a Ford built engine used on their other cars, but none of the Ford engines would fit the bill, could not produce the horsepower and other things Jaguar wouldn't agree to, and so the pure Jaguar engines were agreed upon and thus are in our cars. I read somewhere in one of my Jaguar books that the only "Off Shelf" Ford item that was used on the XK8 engine was a Ford oil pan plug.
People are funny. The Ford name has always been the butt-in of many jokes, but the fact is, if it hadn't been for FORD, I doubt the car industry would be where it is today. Ford today is building some of the prettiest top in cars on the road to. I often wondered why people don't worry about the German influence on our cars---drive trains etc. hummmm?
Chuck
05/XJ8L & XK8 Conv
The following users liked this post:
enderle (07-12-2014)
#20