F-Pace (X761) / C-X17 2016 - Onwards

F-Pace S vs. Range Rover SC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2017 | 01:43 PM
  #1  
Wolfy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 174
From: Manhattan Beach, CA
Default F-Pace S vs. Range Rover SC

2017 F-Pace S, 5.1 sec 0-60, $59k
2013 Range Rover SC, 4.6 sec, $70k

Which one should I buy???
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2017 | 03:54 PM
  #2  
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4,110
Likes: 1,396
From: Gold Coast, Oz
Default

The rangie (sport) is quite lovely inside and quite huge and airy. Depending on the model, they drive nicely though I think they improved a lot between the older shape and the new. Personally I find the tech in the pre-16 models dated and I cant cop the steering wheel that looks like it is 30 years old.

The F Pace is much more like a sedan inside. The interior might be a bit generic for some though we have it in the XE and love it.

If you dont like paying for petrol, then you might not like the rangie. They are very thirsty driven hard.

Personally I'd go the F Pace but if you are a V8 fan, like some wood in the interior, and want more space, the Rangie might be more your cuppa tea. One of the boys in our office has the 2016 RR sport 3.0 TTD to establish his polo credentials, he absolutely raves about it, and even in the base form it is a beautiful car inside.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2017 | 09:01 PM
  #3  
slojotaa's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 197
From: New Jersey
Default

Interesting question. I just did a lot of research. Let me start out by stating I have an F-Pace S, and an F-Type 16 R. The R is flawless. The F-Pace has been a tough road for me to travel.

Although I won't get into the issues, as they are bountiful, and a large part remedied, I have lost some confidence in the model design and quality/engineering. Breaks my heart to say this, but it is what it is. I have an opportunity to jump out of this vehicle and start with a clean slate. I was looking into the Range Rover Sport, and after researching it found that many problems exist as well, not as many as I had with the 1st year F-Pace, but problems as well. If I switched, I lose:
Maintenance and warranty coverage up to 60K
A damned good looking car, ride and feel
Reasonable payments per month.
Again....a lot of good things, stereo sound (now that adjusted and padded around speakers).....the list goes on.

The worry:
Still have a problem with the AEB warning light, and Auto High Beam Sensor warning on dash toggling back and forth intermittently, and without prompting. This is after they changed the sensor module behind the mirror.

I understand that the differentials are weak and there are other things that could be a problem, but then again....I am covered for 60K.

? = What to do......, or as the rock song goes...."should I stay or should I go"!

Lastly, there isn't another SUV that lights my panels like the Jaguar F-Pace does.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2017 | 08:13 AM
  #4  
RoonieQ's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 334
Likes: 90
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by slojotaa
... I understand that the differentials are weak...
Where did you hear this? Please share your source.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2017 | 12:45 PM
  #5  
BigCat09's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 362
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

At a quick glance I built a RR Sport on Jags USA site and it topped out at $200k that's a lot of coin for an SUV or this stature. I like the F-Pace better for the money even though it's a XE basically.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2017 | 05:46 AM
  #6  
slojotaa's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 197
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by BigCat09
At a quick glance I built a RR Sport on Jags USA site and it topped out at $200k that's a lot of coin for an SUV or this stature. I like the F-Pace better for the money even though it's a XE basically.
I built one and it clocked in at 105K, but even if you added everything possible, I can't come up to this number. Either way, you are right, a lot of coin and F-Pace still does the trick despite some first year issues.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2017 | 05:48 AM
  #7  
slojotaa's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 197
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by RoonieQ
Where did you hear this? Please share your source.
Two reputable mechanics in Pa and in Chicago that I know well who do work on these vehicles. I wish I could verify this, thus why I wrote it. I do have to qualify that nobody should buy or not for that matter based upon this, but rather just verify it for your own selves. Thanks for the question, and this is the source(s) that i was referencing.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2017 | 08:36 AM
  #8  
RoonieQ's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 334
Likes: 90
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by slojotaa
Two reputable mechanics in Pa and in Chicago that I know well who do work on these vehicles. I wish I could verify this, thus why I wrote it. I do have to qualify that nobody should buy or not for that matter based upon this, but rather just verify it for your own selves. Thanks for the question, and this is the source(s) that i was referencing.
Cheers. Something to keep in mind at service intervals when the vehicle is in for routine maintenance and health checks. Haven't heard it before, aside from some owners with differential leaks.
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2017 | 11:08 AM
  #9  
BigCat09's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 362
From: Orlando, Florida
Talking

Originally Posted by slojotaa
I built one and it clocked in at 105K, but even if you added everything possible, I can't come up to this number. Either way, you are right, a lot of coin and F-Pace still does the trick despite some first year issues.
And this is BASE price before adding any options. That is 1 huge price tag and its limited to 130 MPH like my XE is while the F-Pace goes 155 MPH like all the rest.
2017 RANGE ROVER LR-V8

Our most alluring, precisely engineered and refined Range Rover ever.

This model’s key features:

Unique front grille
Unique wheels
Unique side vent graphics
Bright chrome upper and lower door handles
Unique SVAutobiography badge
Rear centre chiller compartment and power deployable tables finished with Ebony leather
Unique seat and stitch pattern with perforated Semi-Aniline Leather and Rear Executive Class seating
Leather Perforated Headlining
InControl Touch Pro (10" Touchscreen)
Surround Camera System
Meridian™ Surround Sound System (825W)
10" Rear Seat Entertainment
Calf Rest
ALL STANDARD FEATURES
Base MSRP From $199,950*
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2017 | 12:26 PM
  #10  
Wolfy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 174
From: Manhattan Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BigCat09
Meridian™ Surround Sound System (825W)

Base MSRP From $199,950*
For that price it should have the 1700-watt 29-speaker 5.1 3D Meridian Signature audio. Just saying/

 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2017 | 05:29 PM
  #11  
Quebecjag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 219
Likes: 35
From: Sutton,Québec, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by slojotaa

Lastly, there isn't another SUV that lights my panels like the Jaguar F-Pace does.
Agree
+1
Guy
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2017 | 08:09 PM
  #12  
DPK's Avatar
DPK
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 533
From: OKC, OK
Default

IMO..I think the Range Rover looks too much like a Ford Explorer
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2017 | 02:24 PM
  #13  
RoonieQ's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 334
Likes: 90
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by DPK
IMO..I think the Range Rover looks too much like a Ford Explorer
I'm sure that was Ford's intention.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 05:27 AM
  #14  
slojotaa's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 197
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by RoonieQ
I'm sure that was Ford's intention.
That is what I thought. I test drove the RR Sport, and can safely say the ride of the F-Pace out "Paces" (pun intended) by far. Rover is a heavy beast, research says that breaks every 16K +/- are around $1500- $1800, tires go pretty fast, and this alone was a ? mark or me, but the ride....."I was like get me back into my F-Pace".
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 12:59 PM
  #15  
ddsski's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 271
Likes: 26
From: CT
Default

Entirely different vehicles with a different purpose. RR Sport has massive offroad capability and size to haul a lot of stuff. F Pace is a tall sports sedan with a too tiny gas tank. Don't get me wrong a diesel is on my list of must drive vehicles, but Jag really screwed up a few things with the F Pace design. Same parent company, same suppliers, same assembly protocols etc AFAIK
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2017 | 05:52 AM
  #16  
jaguny's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,317
Likes: 635
From: upstate new york
Default

If you use the RR for business, I believe it may qualify for a 179d tax deduction, which offers greater depreciation. This is based on Gross vechicle weight as I recall. My 2015 LR4 qualified. It doesn't ease the pain of the sticker shock a lot but it's worth at least several thousands. Ultimately depends on how much of your driving is business. I wouldn't think f pace would qualify, but haven't checked.
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.