Broke my record at the track last night in my Bone Stock Jag!!! 11.30@125MPH
#1
Broke my record at the track last night in my Bone Stock Jag!!! 11.30@125MPH
Well, I have had my Jag for about 2 and a half months or so now and there is a bit of learning to launch this thing and such to be the most efficient anyway since it doesn't have an actual launch control.
I also took my Bone Stock Mercedes G63 AMG to the track last night as well. This one is tricky because it has a lot of torque limiters and such on it so you have to learn how to launch it as well, but it ended up doing 13 flat at 107mph! I believe this is a record as well as the next fastest Bone Stock one of this generation is 13.19@106.
Below is the video from my Midnight Drags adventure last night with these two vehicles and then timeslips and such as well. I think the Gwagen could squeak a 12 second time and the Jag maybe a .26 or so but we just had to get out of there as we had other engagements last night to attend.
Now time to perform the first modification and test!
I also took my Bone Stock Mercedes G63 AMG to the track last night as well. This one is tricky because it has a lot of torque limiters and such on it so you have to learn how to launch it as well, but it ended up doing 13 flat at 107mph! I believe this is a record as well as the next fastest Bone Stock one of this generation is 13.19@106.
Below is the video from my Midnight Drags adventure last night with these two vehicles and then timeslips and such as well. I think the Gwagen could squeak a 12 second time and the Jag maybe a .26 or so but we just had to get out of there as we had other engagements last night to attend.
Now time to perform the first modification and test!
Last edited by TT_6SPD_95; 04-18-2022 at 08:23 AM.
The following 6 users liked this post by TT_6SPD_95:
bcbruno (04-20-2022),
Jamal302 (04-18-2022),
Phantomf4collector (04-18-2022),
u102768 (04-18-2022),
ViperX100 (04-17-2022),
and 1 others liked this post.
#2
Well, I have had my Jag for about 2 and a half months or so now and there is a bit of learning to launch this thing and such to be the most efficient anyway since it doesn't have an actual launch control.
I also took my Bone Stock Mercedes G63 AMG to the track last night as well. This one is tricky because it has a lot of torque limiters and such on it so you have to learn how to launch it as well, but it ended up doing 13 flat at 107mph!
Below is the video from my Midnight Drags adventure last night with these two vehicles and then timeslips and such as well. I think the Gwagen could squeak a 12 second time and the Jag maybe a .26 or so but we just had to get out of there as we had other engagements last night to attend.
Now time to perform the first modification and test!
https://youtu.be/QpY-rmQuPl4
I also took my Bone Stock Mercedes G63 AMG to the track last night as well. This one is tricky because it has a lot of torque limiters and such on it so you have to learn how to launch it as well, but it ended up doing 13 flat at 107mph!
Below is the video from my Midnight Drags adventure last night with these two vehicles and then timeslips and such as well. I think the Gwagen could squeak a 12 second time and the Jag maybe a .26 or so but we just had to get out of there as we had other engagements last night to attend.
Now time to perform the first modification and test!
https://youtu.be/QpY-rmQuPl4
#3
#4
#5
#7
Thanks!
I just did a video of the first modification which is the BMC race filters. At the same time I now know which stock pulley I have so I can start my order with AP for my next mods as well.
I will be testing the BMC's to see what exactly they do and will be reporting back.
I just did a video of the first modification which is the BMC race filters. At the same time I now know which stock pulley I have so I can start my order with AP for my next mods as well.
I will be testing the BMC's to see what exactly they do and will be reporting back.
The following users liked this post:
Jamal302 (04-21-2022)
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 8,313
Received 3,131 Likes
on
2,307 Posts
Thanks!
I just did a video of the first modification which is the BMC race filters. At the same time I now know which stock pulley I have so I can start my order with AP for my next mods as well.
I will be testing the BMC's to see what exactly they do and will be reporting back.
https://youtu.be/I0oj8qucC-M
I just did a video of the first modification which is the BMC race filters. At the same time I now know which stock pulley I have so I can start my order with AP for my next mods as well.
I will be testing the BMC's to see what exactly they do and will be reporting back.
https://youtu.be/I0oj8qucC-M
For a long time I considered swapping out the stock air filters for BMC but after lots of reading and research I decided against it, for two reasons:
1. From all reports the BMC filters (and similar K&N filters) flow no better than the already very good stock paper filters and produce no increase in power, torque or performance.
2. They are oil coated filters (again like K&N) which means they need to be removed, cleaned and recoated every once in a while (say 20,000 miles) which is a PITA on the F-Type. Also there is the risk of excess coating oil getting on the MAF wires and causing running problems.
So I eventually replaced the OEM filters with the same type of filters, and then a few months ago I replaced the lower intakes (ie filter boxes and filters) with the Mina Gallery set up, not for any power/torque/performance reason but purely for mucho increased SC whine.
You said in the other thread that you want to stick with the OEM filter box set up and I am a little curious as to why, as I see (and have had) no downsides to the Mina Gallery type of cone filter / removal of the baffles set up.
#9
Thanks!
I just did a video of the first modification which is the BMC race filters. At the same time I now know which stock pulley I have so I can start my order with AP for my next mods as well.
I will be testing the BMC's to see what exactly they do and will be reporting back.
https://youtu.be/I0oj8qucC-M
I just did a video of the first modification which is the BMC race filters. At the same time I now know which stock pulley I have so I can start my order with AP for my next mods as well.
I will be testing the BMC's to see what exactly they do and will be reporting back.
https://youtu.be/I0oj8qucC-M
#10
Following what you say about the BMC air filters.
For a long time I considered swapping out the stock air filters for BMC but after lots of reading and research I decided against it, for two reasons:
1. From all reports the BMC filters (and similar K&N filters) flow no better than the already very good stock paper filters and produce no increase in power, torque or performance.
2. They are oil coated filters (again like K&N) which means they need to be removed, cleaned and recoated every once in a while (say 20,000 miles) which is a PITA on the F-Type. Also there is the risk of excess coating oil getting on the MAF wires and causing running problems.
So I eventually replaced the OEM filters with the same type of filters, and then a few months ago I replaced the lower intakes (ie filter boxes and filters) with the Mina Gallery set up, not for any power/torque/performance reason but purely for mucho increased SC whine.
You said in the other thread that you want to stick with the OEM filter box set up and I am a little curious as to why, as I see (and have had) no downsides to the Mina Gallery type of cone filter / removal of the baffles set up.
For a long time I considered swapping out the stock air filters for BMC but after lots of reading and research I decided against it, for two reasons:
1. From all reports the BMC filters (and similar K&N filters) flow no better than the already very good stock paper filters and produce no increase in power, torque or performance.
2. They are oil coated filters (again like K&N) which means they need to be removed, cleaned and recoated every once in a while (say 20,000 miles) which is a PITA on the F-Type. Also there is the risk of excess coating oil getting on the MAF wires and causing running problems.
So I eventually replaced the OEM filters with the same type of filters, and then a few months ago I replaced the lower intakes (ie filter boxes and filters) with the Mina Gallery set up, not for any power/torque/performance reason but purely for mucho increased SC whine.
You said in the other thread that you want to stick with the OEM filter box set up and I am a little curious as to why, as I see (and have had) no downsides to the Mina Gallery type of cone filter / removal of the baffles set up.
#11
Following what you say about the BMC air filters.
For a long time I considered swapping out the stock air filters for BMC but after lots of reading and research I decided against it, for two reasons:
1. From all reports the BMC filters (and similar K&N filters) flow no better than the already very good stock paper filters and produce no increase in power, torque or performance.
2. They are oil coated filters (again like K&N) which means they need to be removed, cleaned and recoated every once in a while (say 20,000 miles) which is a PITA on the F-Type. Also there is the risk of excess coating oil getting on the MAF wires and causing running problems.
So I eventually replaced the OEM filters with the same type of filters, and then a few months ago I replaced the lower intakes (ie filter boxes and filters) with the Mina Gallery set up, not for any power/torque/performance reason but purely for mucho increased SC whine.
You said in the other thread that you want to stick with the OEM filter box set up and I am a little curious as to why, as I see (and have had) no downsides to the Mina Gallery type of cone filter / removal of the baffles set up.
For a long time I considered swapping out the stock air filters for BMC but after lots of reading and research I decided against it, for two reasons:
1. From all reports the BMC filters (and similar K&N filters) flow no better than the already very good stock paper filters and produce no increase in power, torque or performance.
2. They are oil coated filters (again like K&N) which means they need to be removed, cleaned and recoated every once in a while (say 20,000 miles) which is a PITA on the F-Type. Also there is the risk of excess coating oil getting on the MAF wires and causing running problems.
So I eventually replaced the OEM filters with the same type of filters, and then a few months ago I replaced the lower intakes (ie filter boxes and filters) with the Mina Gallery set up, not for any power/torque/performance reason but purely for mucho increased SC whine.
You said in the other thread that you want to stick with the OEM filter box set up and I am a little curious as to why, as I see (and have had) no downsides to the Mina Gallery type of cone filter / removal of the baffles set up.
Last edited by Andi Jaguar G; 04-20-2022 at 02:52 AM.
#12
#13
Think of it this way...if it's trying to pull in more air than what's available is where the problem would be. I would suspect in the lower RPM's this isn't going to be an issue at all, but only in the upper RPM's which is where the engine lives during racing.
#14
congratulations, this is a crazy good time in my eyes. But I wonder how that works with a series R and 550 hp? My R AWD with 640 hp Stage 2
and TCU software transmission update is around 11 seconds and 127.4 miles per hour. The new 911 Turbo s 992 with 650 hp has 10.7 seconds
and 137 miles per hour. An 11.3 is already heavy with 100 hp less. The SVR runs in 12,2 Sek. and 124 mile/h. Can you explain that? We see it
on paper, but where does this great time come from? Didn't do anything else with your F Type?
THX
BR
Andi
and TCU software transmission update is around 11 seconds and 127.4 miles per hour. The new 911 Turbo s 992 with 650 hp has 10.7 seconds
and 137 miles per hour. An 11.3 is already heavy with 100 hp less. The SVR runs in 12,2 Sek. and 124 mile/h. Can you explain that? We see it
on paper, but where does this great time come from? Didn't do anything else with your F Type?
THX
BR
Andi
#15
congratulations, this is a crazy good time in my eyes. But I wonder how that works with a series R and 550 hp? My R AWD with 640 hp Stage 2
and TCU software transmission update is around 11 seconds and 127.4 miles per hour. The new 911 Turbo s 992 with 650 hp has 10.7 seconds
and 137 miles per hour. An 11.3 is already heavy with 100 hp less. The SVR runs in 12,2 Sek. and 124 mile/h. Can you explain that? We see it
on paper, but where does this great time come from? Didn't do anything else with your F Type?
THX
BR
Andi
and TCU software transmission update is around 11 seconds and 127.4 miles per hour. The new 911 Turbo s 992 with 650 hp has 10.7 seconds
and 137 miles per hour. An 11.3 is already heavy with 100 hp less. The SVR runs in 12,2 Sek. and 124 mile/h. Can you explain that? We see it
on paper, but where does this great time come from? Didn't do anything else with your F Type?
THX
BR
Andi
Below is a video where I'm doing the first modification to this car and changing out my stock air filters over to the BMC Race filters and will be testing those soon when it stops raining here. The video I made of this install also helped me order my AP crank pulley because you have to know which stock pulley you have first before you can make the order and in the video it helped me show them which stock pulley I had.
I just made my order with AP for everything last night which includes the lower pulley, upper pulley and tune. The other thing that I'll be getting is the logger box as well. First I will test the BMC Race filters making sure all variables are the same to know the exact difference. I have done extensive testing so I'll know if there is a tenth of a second difference or even half of a tenth difference. After that I'll be installing new parts from AP and testing those as well.
Last edited by TT_6SPD_95; 04-21-2022 at 07:47 AM.
The following users liked this post:
bobjagbob (04-21-2022)
#16
very good, nice that I have another enthusiastic tuner here in the forum, who passes on his experiences.
I'm curious, theoretically you can go from 11.3 to a smooth 10 seconds for the 1/4 mile when the VAP parts are installed. That would be absolutely violent and almost unbelievable! So 6-7 tenths faster than a 992 Turbo S with 650 hp!!! I'm really excited to see what comes out after the VAP conversion campaign. I WISH YOU SUCCESS...
I'm curious, theoretically you can go from 11.3 to a smooth 10 seconds for the 1/4 mile when the VAP parts are installed. That would be absolutely violent and almost unbelievable! So 6-7 tenths faster than a 992 Turbo S with 650 hp!!! I'm really excited to see what comes out after the VAP conversion campaign. I WISH YOU SUCCESS...
#17
very good, nice that I have another enthusiastic tuner here in the forum, who passes on his experiences.
I'm curious, theoretically you can go from 11.3 to a smooth 10 seconds for the 1/4 mile when the VAP parts are installed. That would be absolutely violent and almost unbelievable! So 6-7 tenths faster than a 992 Turbo S with 650 hp!!! I'm really excited to see what comes out after the VAP conversion campaign. I WISH YOU SUCCESS...
I'm curious, theoretically you can go from 11.3 to a smooth 10 seconds for the 1/4 mile when the VAP parts are installed. That would be absolutely violent and almost unbelievable! So 6-7 tenths faster than a 992 Turbo S with 650 hp!!! I'm really excited to see what comes out after the VAP conversion campaign. I WISH YOU SUCCESS...
#18
very good, nice that I have another enthusiastic tuner here in the forum, who passes on his experiences.
I'm curious, theoretically you can go from 11.3 to a smooth 10 seconds for the 1/4 mile when the VAP parts are installed. That would be absolutely violent and almost unbelievable! So 6-7 tenths faster than a 992 Turbo S with 650 hp!!! I'm really excited to see what comes out after the VAP conversion campaign. I WISH YOU SUCCESS...
I'm curious, theoretically you can go from 11.3 to a smooth 10 seconds for the 1/4 mile when the VAP parts are installed. That would be absolutely violent and almost unbelievable! So 6-7 tenths faster than a 992 Turbo S with 650 hp!!! I'm really excited to see what comes out after the VAP conversion campaign. I WISH YOU SUCCESS...
You have to think of "average hp" in the actual racing RPM too when comparing hp...not just peak numbers.
#20
Wow, nice!
When you placed your order with Velocity AP did they mention anything about using Boostane octane booster to fully take advantage of their tune after changing both pulleys? What octane did you run for the 11.30 pass?
Looking forward to seeing how the upgrades go.
While I don't have an F-type R I do have a 2021 F-Pace SVR...similar Velocity AP mods are being considered .
Thanks, and good luck!
When you placed your order with Velocity AP did they mention anything about using Boostane octane booster to fully take advantage of their tune after changing both pulleys? What octane did you run for the 11.30 pass?
Looking forward to seeing how the upgrades go.
While I don't have an F-type R I do have a 2021 F-Pace SVR...similar Velocity AP mods are being considered .
Thanks, and good luck!