F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Cars That Should Have Been Stars But Weren't

Old Apr 2, 2022 | 01:28 PM
  #1  
cpq100's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 825
Likes: 301
From: Pennsylvania
Default Cars That Should Have Been Stars But Weren't

While I have never had my car on a track and don't really push it on the road except in a straight line I never expected to see the F-Type listed on this Autocar list of Cars That Should Have Been Stars, But Weren't list. They specifically mention the V6.

I have no idea how credible Autocar is. They appear to be based in the UK.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news...nb7Kz#image=16

 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2022 | 07:55 PM
  #2  
Mahjik's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 392
From: Kansas City, MO
Default

I can't say I'm the average driver, but I felt it was one of the most composed and stiffest street cars I've driven on a track. OEM tires are not track worthy though..
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2022 | 11:47 AM
  #3  
Luc Lapierre's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 520
Likes: 248
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default

“…the F-Type has a challenging chassis, at least in lesser V6 form.”


???




“…composure less complete than offered by either Porsche’s 718 or 911.”


Funny enough, I chose the F Type by miles after coming away quite disappointed from a test drive in a Boxster. And Alex from Carthrottle claimed he’d buy a V6 F Type over a 911, so I’m gonna say that settles it 🙃




 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2022 | 12:52 PM
  #4  
KalamazooJag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 191
Likes: 96
From: Kalamazoo
Default

All of this is so subjective. The simple truth is that there is no more beautiful, sexy, or awe-inspiring car than the F-Type. Happy to have settled that objectively.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2022 | 10:32 AM
  #5  
Suaro's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 669
Likes: 119
From: Arizona Desert
Default

The easy part yes that Autocar is British, has been around since the beginning of time, and is generally very well regarded.

As to the larger question I think that the sales numbers are the incontrovertible answer. It is an extremely nice looking car but that’s it. The convertible is impracticable in the extreme. The idea of a car with no spare and no cargo area is not going to be appealing to many people. The chassis is a shortened XK.

I think my XK-8 and the 150 I had in school were both more successful automobiles
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2022 | 01:54 PM
  #6  
Xec's Avatar
Xec
Member
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 77
Likes: 44
From: TX
Default

From the introduction, there didn't seem to be a particular quantifiable measure of "success" or being a "star." On the F-Type, they focused particularly on the handling of the car. This is a bit unfair as this was never the point of the F-Type. It was never meant to compete against Porsche's offerings directly on the handling side and it doesn't drive like one. It's a fantastic GT car that sounds great, incredible in a straight line, comfy and rides well, and looks great. I reach for my SVR keys if I need to run errands, go out for a nice dinner, or go out for a fun drive etc. The F-Type is fun even when I don't push it and that's something that I really love about it. You can enjoy all the hilarity of the noise and the pops without needing to wring its neck. And it still handles very well - I far prefer it to my C63S or other AMGs I've driven like the E63S.

I also have a 911 GT3. That's a completely different car that is very focused on driving and handling. The GT3 in sharp contrast to the F-Type isn't very fun if you're not driving it hard. The engine makes all its power north of 6K RPMs and has almost nothing down below. It's a car that I go out to drive hard and drive focused on the weekends. It's also slower in a straight-line in most scenarios thanks to the powerband of the engine. You stomp on the F-Type pedal and you're gone.

Really a silly article IMHO.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2022 | 02:51 PM
  #7  
MajorTom's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 574
Likes: 336
From: Luxembourg
Default

Weird list. Whoever wrote that doesn't seem to know quite what they're talking about. Just something posted on an msn page and just doesn't seem to match autocar's otherwise serious writing. Autocar generally also rate the F-Type high in the reviews on their own site, for instance in this one:

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review...type-2014-2019
 

Last edited by MajorTom; Apr 5, 2022 at 02:55 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2022 | 03:50 PM
  #8  
Suaro's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 669
Likes: 119
From: Arizona Desert
Default

I beg to differ. The F-Type was marketed and sold as a sports car as opposed to the GT’s which preceded it. The all purpose answer as to why the F type did not have a particular feature was that it was a true sports car and like the 911 didn’t have it. A garage door opener, Sacre Bleu! The 911 was clearly the benchmark.

The truth of the matter is that it’s a shortened XK chassis that is overweight and in its heavyweight AWD V8 iterations doesn’t handle that well. Many believe that the lighter weight V6 with RWD and manual transmission came the closest to the sports car goal.

So at the end of the day it’s a miss. Not a GT or a Sports car, A piece of automobile sculpture. Like an Avanti.

And the proof is it doesn’t sell. I see more Ferrari’s than F-types.
 

Last edited by Suaro; Apr 5, 2022 at 06:10 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2022 | 05:00 PM
  #9  
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,831
Likes: 1,792
From: Southampton, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Suaro
And the proof is it doesn’t sell. I see more Ferrari’s than F-types.
Yeah, Ferraris are dead common. Now, if you want something a bit special .....
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2022 | 05:18 PM
  #10  
Suaro's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 669
Likes: 119
From: Arizona Desert
Default

Originally Posted by scm
Yeah, Ferraris are dead common. Now, if you want something a bit special .....
How right you are. I remember the local Ferrari dealer telling me the problem with the Tesstarossa was simply that they made too many of them.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FType17
F-Type ( X152 )
10
Aug 3, 2018 07:29 PM
powerhouse
F-Type ( X152 )
6
Nov 19, 2017 04:44 PM
uncheel
F-Type ( X152 )
10
Apr 20, 2016 01:11 PM
DGL
F-Type ( X152 )
3
Sep 27, 2014 11:51 PM
amcdonal86
F-Type ( X152 )
6
Jul 2, 2013 07:08 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 AM.