F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

ECU Tuning Group | Jaguar F-Type Pulley Installation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2014 | 10:39 PM
  #21  
alexg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 707
Likes: 102
From: San Anselmo
Default

Originally Posted by sales@ECU Tuning Group
We can only comment on OUR tuning and OUR customers. If any of our customers had any issues they are more than welcome to post their experience and invoice number here.

We do so many of these cars a week. Since 2009, we have not once heard from any of our customers that our tune has been detected.

For us this discussion is closed until someone posts an invoice number.
Saying none of your customers have had no issues is not the same as saying your customers have sold the car and the tune is not detected. The tune would invalidate my warranty so if eg. I did want to sell this might be an issue.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2014 | 10:43 PM
  #22  
sales@ECU Tuning Group's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Sponsor
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 40
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by alexg
so 538hp is the max for my vert?

That dyno sheet shows whp. 618hp to the engine
 

Last edited by sales@ECU Tuning Group; Sep 6, 2014 at 10:45 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 06:01 AM
  #23  
F-typical's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 179
From: Herefordshire, England
Default

Originally Posted by schraderade
The ECU controls engine and transmission side of the supercharged engine system. But ultimately the drive ratio for the supercharger is set by the relative size of the pulley wheels....that can't be changed by the ECU.

The easiest way to change the supercharger blower drive ratio is to reduce the size of the blower pulley wheel, so that it spins faster per engine RPM, forcing more air into the engine, allowing for different air compression and fuel mixes (which are controlled by the ECU engine-side....so the pulley change needs to be accompanied by an ECU remap).
Note that the engine is actually doing the work of spinning the blower (via the pulley system), so you are giving up quite a bit of fuel efficiency by increasing the supercharger drive ratio.
Thanks for the response. Okay, maybe a little more detail would help:


The Torque curve on the V8 is a 'table-top between 2500-5500rpm. As this engine has a mechanically driven supercharger, it ought to be an inverted u-shape. This strongly suggests that boost is being bled off between the 2500-5500rpm to maintain a constant level of boost and torque (with the help of appropriate fuelling and ignition timing).

Sticking a smaller pulley on the supercharger, but making no other changes will extend the table-top to the left, but probably at the expense of the right hand side as the efficiency of the supercharger drops off earlier as it is spinning faster.

Additionally, as you mention, driving the supercharger faster is going to soak up more of the engine's output.

So, back to the original question: Wouldn't it be more effective on this engine to leave the pulley as is, and make changes to the software so that boost isn't limited? Projecting the edges of the table-top suggests a peak of 675Nm @ 4000rpm would be the result before you start optimising the fuelling and ignition timing.

Questions? Comments?
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 09:27 AM
  #24  
JgaXkr's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 286
From: Boston Mass
Default

Originally Posted by alexg
Saying none of your customers have had no issues is not the same as saying your customers have sold the car and the tune is not detected. The tune would invalidate my warranty so if eg. I did want to sell this might be an issue.
The tune would only be an issue if you have an issue with the car & Jaguar Cars saw the non factory software on a printout from the IDS computer. I am sure if they asked one of their Jaguar dealers to do a simple vehicle scan they would see what I mean. The other comment about doing 4-5 cars a day is almost 100 Jaguars a month. That sounds like an awful lot of cars.

To the gentleman questioning the pulley installation, I have done quite a few myself & never had a problem. The only thing we did differently was instead of using a torch we put the pulley in a toaster oven for 1/2 an hour on 350. The pulley will slide on just make sure you slide it back as far as the original.

To anyone out there with doubts on the pulley & tune, just do it. It makes a world of difference. You will be truly amazed how much faster the car is.
 

Last edited by JgaXkr; Sep 7, 2014 at 09:35 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 09:57 AM
  #25  
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 996
Likes: 122
From: New York
Default

Imagine what the R could do w/tune & pulley.

 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 04:32 PM
  #26  
Mulmur's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 265
From: Mulmur, Ontario, Canada
Default

Yes, I assume the R would end up with more than 618 h.p..
Lawrence.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 04:53 PM
  #27  
Timbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 394
Likes: 102
From: Ruislip, London
Default

I presume your figures are for a convertable!
If so thats an improvement of over 120bhp, if this is the case what do you expect from the coupe R!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 06:09 PM
  #28  
MarcusXFR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 180
Likes: 56
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Dremorg
Dremorg,

Did you catch this one?

 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 07:02 PM
  #29  
swajames's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 906
Likes: 228
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Here's a video of a stock V8S doing the quarter mile in 11.9 seconds.

 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 07:52 PM
  #30  
stevenc22's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

Type R did pretty well against the Ferrari
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 10:40 AM
  #31  
sales@ECU Tuning Group's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Sponsor
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 40
From: California
Default

We take the R to 627hp
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 12:28 PM
  #32  
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 996
Likes: 122
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by stevenc22
Type R did pretty well against the Ferrari
Yes it did. Like i said, imagine with tune & pulley....
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 12:30 PM
  #33  
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 996
Likes: 122
From: New York
Default

I think i'm just going to pull the trigger on both tune & pulley.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 12:32 PM
  #34  
Timbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 394
Likes: 102
From: Ruislip, London
Default

So my R which starts out with over 50bhp more than the vert, ends up with only 10bhp more and for the same money.
Doesnt sound great to be honest, why isnt the tune comparative to what they both start with!!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 12:43 PM
  #35  
Mulmur's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 265
From: Mulmur, Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
So my R which starts out with over 50bhp more than the vert, ends up with only 10bhp more and for the same money.
Doesnt sound great to be honest, why isnt the tune comparative to what they both start with!!!
I'm just guessing, but I assume they hit the limits of the engine valving and displacement and also, perhaps the limits of the inherent strength of the crank etc.. etc...
Lawrence.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 12:52 PM
  #36  
Mulmur's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 265
From: Mulmur, Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Dremorg
I think i'm just going to pull the trigger on both tune & pulley.
Your feedback would be really interesting if you go ahead with this. I might consider it next spring.
Lawrence
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 01:02 PM
  #37  
sales@ECU Tuning Group's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Sponsor
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 40
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
So my R which starts out with over 50bhp more than the vert, ends up with only 10bhp more and for the same money.
Doesnt sound great to be honest, why isnt the tune comparative to what they both start with!!!
The 470hp, 495hp, 510hp and 550hp have the same engine. The R has a sports exhaust.

When it comes to the R, we only recommend it with a pulley. Even though Jaguar states 550hp the car measures lower (520-530hp), with the ECU tune only the car ends up at 575hp.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 01:05 PM
  #38  
schraderade's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 402
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by F-typical
The Torque curve on the V8 is a 'table-top between 2500-5500rpm. As this engine has a mechanically driven supercharger, it ought to be an inverted u-shape. This strongly suggests that boost is being bled off between the 2500-5500rpm to maintain a constant level of boost and torque (with the help of appropriate fuelling and ignition timing).

Sticking a smaller pulley on the supercharger, but making no other changes will extend the table-top to the left, but probably at the expense of the right hand side as the efficiency of the supercharger drops off earlier as it is spinning faster.

Additionally, as you mention, driving the supercharger faster is going to soak up more of the engine's output.

So, back to the original question: Wouldn't it be more effective on this engine to leave the pulley as is, and make changes to the software so that boost isn't limited? Projecting the edges of the table-top suggests a peak of 675Nm @ 4000rpm would be the result before you start optimising the fuelling and ignition timing.

Questions? Comments?
Agree on the curve effects. As I noted, pulley swaps should be accompanied by an ECU remap because otherwise you are just increasing the air-fuel ratio in the engine, which can actually decrease output and cause other problems like engine knock.

I suspect the reason folks try not to exceed the tabletop is for risk management. You can "borrow" from the right side of the tabletop, but if one just goes above the engine performance envelope you risk serious engine damage, for example the engine may run hotter than the cooling system can compensate for and you end up with one of those awesome melting videos

From the ideal gas law, pressure x volume / temperature is constant, so by introducing greater pressure into the chamber (via supercharging) and more fuel (to match the added pressure) operating temperature goes up also. So the entire engine runs hotter. To achieve higher power at lower RPM with the same engine on the same octane fuel, you have to increase pressure and optimize air-fuel ratio....but as you do this temperature necessarily increases also. So limiting the output for a given RPM is the easiest way to keep the engine within acceptable operating limits.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 08:50 PM
  #39  
myidsucks's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 104
Likes: 11
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by sales@ECU Tuning Group
We take the R to 627hp


Can you guys do the install at your location in the L.A. area and if so, how long does it take?
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 09:01 PM
  #40  
sales@ECU Tuning Group's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Sponsor
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 40
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by myidsucks
Can you guys do the install at your location in the L.A. area and if so, how long does it take?
Yes, It will take 3 hours. No longer.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.