F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Good News for CA F types with VAP Tune!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2020 | 05:14 PM
  #1  
Chawumba's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 800
Likes: 243
From: So Cal
Default Good News for CA F types with VAP Tune!

I understand CA significantly tightened its testing criteria last August, so I was a tad nervous when I took my F type in for a SMOG test today. But happy to report, that at least with a VAP tune, the car passed with no issues!

Wish I could say the same for my supercharged M3 - gonna have to sell that car to someone out of state - the magical "no show" smog certs are a thing of the past....

 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 08:22 AM
  #2  
Toddiesel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 133
Likes: 11
From: Denver
Default

I haven't lived in california for almost 2 decades, but when I did, I was in a car crew and everyone had lots of mods and even engine swaps that would NO WAY pass smog. Some of those guys knew a guy who knew a guy (you know the deal) and could just get a different car smogged and tagged as their car. You just have to know who to talk to. That or move of that god awful state (someone on the vette forum called it the PRK- people's republic of kalifornia) and hope that cancerous state breaks away from the rest of the US in a massive earthquake!
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 09:06 AM
  #3  
Chawumba's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 800
Likes: 243
From: So Cal
Default

So back in August they changed the testing procedures, the state's software is now smarter, reading the VIN off the ECU, checking drive cycles, tracking the past 10 cold starts, stored codes, etc. So getting the "no show" or special smog certs are nearly impossible now. Anyways, just wanted to let folks know not to sweat the tune, as long as you don't go to high flow cats, you should be ok for SMOG test in Cali.

Besides the punitive SMOG rules, Kalifornia is anti car in many ways. 10% sales (and/or use tax) and obscene registration fees and now higher insurance premiums make owning multiple cars in CA too expensive to justify. That and I have yet to find a six car garage in a sub $10 million dollar here by the coast. Wanted to keep the F type, but it was time to find it a new home.
 

Last edited by Chawumba; Feb 3, 2020 at 09:45 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 09:38 AM
  #4  
Toddiesel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 133
Likes: 11
From: Denver
Default

Originally Posted by Chawumba
So back in August they changed the testing procedures, the states software is now smarter, reading the VIN off the ECU, checking drive cycles, tracking the past 10 cold starts, stored codes, etc. So getting the "no show" or special smog certs are nearly impossible now. Anyways, just wanted to let folks know not to sweat the tune, as long as you don't go to high flow cats, you should be ok for SMOG test in Cali.

Besides the punitive SMOG rules, Kalifornia is anti car in many ways. 10% sales (and/or use tax) and obscene registration fees and now higher insurance premiums make owning multiple cars in CA too expensive to justify. That and I have yet to find a six car garage in a sub $10 million dollar here by the coast. Wanted to keep the F type, but it was time to find it a new home.
Interesting. I'm sure there are still ways around it, but yeah that sounds like a PITA. And yes, Kalifornia is pretty anti everything. Not sure if you knew but even water and air contain chemicals that are known to the state of California to cause cancer...
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 10:05 AM
  #5  
NBCat's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,068
Likes: 2,983
From: Newport Beach, California
Default

I'm always amused by people bashing California. Having lived in other countries, California is relatively easy to get a vehicle inspection. You should have your vehicle inspected through the UK's MOT inspection, for example. If that were the case, many cars here wouldn't be on the road to begin with.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 10:47 AM
  #6  
Toddiesel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 133
Likes: 11
From: Denver
Default

Originally Posted by NBCat
I'm always amused by people bashing California. Having lived in other countries, California is relatively easy to get a vehicle inspection. You should have your vehicle inspected through the UK's MOT inspection, for example. If that were the case, many cars here wouldn't be on the road to begin with.
Sure, but relative to the rest of THIS country, it's god awful. Tons of states have 0 regulations. I had a wildly aggressive tune and straight pipes with no cats on my 2013 Mustang GT in SC and never had to worry about it
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 11:18 AM
  #7  
NBCat's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,068
Likes: 2,983
From: Newport Beach, California
Default

Originally Posted by Toddiesel
Sure, but relative to the rest of THIS country, it's god awful. Tons of states have 0 regulations. I had a wildly aggressive tune and straight pipes with no cats on my 2013 Mustang GT in SC and never had to worry about it
Perhaps they don't have the air quality issues California does. I applaud California and states in the northeast for making an effort to have better air quality.

I've been to South Carolina many times. Beautiful place, but not somewhere I would choose to live.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 11:26 AM
  #8  
Chawumba's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 800
Likes: 243
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by NBCat
Perhaps they don't have the air quality issues California does. I applaud California and states in the northeast for making an effort to have better air quality.
Totally agree!

But in this latest round, they seem to be more like "modification police" than stewards of clean air. My 2010 supercharged M3 with hi flow cats would pass the tailpipe emissions test, but because the air intake, injectors and software has been heavily modified, its deemed undriveable in Cali. I think an exception for such cars that are driven low miles would be nice.

And I'm not opposed to safety inspections. For a state with a very high poverty rate and consequently many old beater cars on the road, an annual safety inspection would make sense. But again, instead of mandating it on all cars, perhaps only cars 7 years or older.....

 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 11:48 AM
  #9  
Carbuff2's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 928
From: Exit 30 in NorthWest NJ
Default

[For a state with a very high poverty rate and consequently many old beater cars on the road, an annual safety inspection would make sense.
I haven't been out to the Left Coast in many years, but at that time, I was amazed at the number of 'beater' cars running (?) on fewer cylinders than designed. Wondered how they got away with that...


Perhaps they need to spend more $$ on along-the-road emissions enforcement?


++++++++++++++++

NJ is a CARB-emissions state, but two years ago they decided that non-OBDII were not worth inspecting for emissions (there were too few, they said). So now, I don't need to inspect our 1988 exotic anymore (which passed emissions fine, thankew).
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 11:49 AM
  #10  
Toddiesel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 133
Likes: 11
From: Denver
Default

Originally Posted by NBCat
Perhaps they don't have the air quality issues California does. I applaud California and states in the northeast for making an effort to have better air quality.

I've been to South Carolina many times. Beautiful place, but not somewhere I would choose to live.
Really depends on where you go. Charleston (where I'm from) is pretty nice but more of the state than not is a hole. But, one of the best states for gun rights. Really annoying liquor laws. Bible belt and all that. Also it's too damn hot, which is why I moved to Denver (and not Texas, which is where I'd really like to live). CO is pretty good on all fronts though. I know they have emissions standards, but nothing like CA. And I definitely agree with the statements that it can pass emission but not pass visual, which is just dumb. They are very anti mod. I've gotten a fix it ticket there for a CAI. Literally nothing else modded and I got a ticket for it, and that's when I had SC plates!! (I was active duty military stationed there so didn't have to register in CA)
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2020 | 11:56 AM
  #11  
Carbuff2's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 928
From: Exit 30 in NorthWest NJ
Default

And I definitely agree with the statements that it can pass emission but not pass visual, which is just dumb.
It seems fair that if they feel they need a rolling road test JUST FOR MODIFIED CARS if needed, the owners should pay for the 'added service'. I agree, if it takes more time to inspect and measure, there is some justification for added compliance inspection.

The nonsense with CARB authorized aftermarket parts being required is nonsense too. If CARB certs guarantee emissions compliance, why not allow them to be fitted????
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2020 | 02:44 AM
  #12  
Ltrain925's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 85
Likes: 15
Default

Ooh the California smog, there always a way around it 😉
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
schraderade
F-Type ( X152 )
18
Aug 14, 2021 11:35 AM
Jklad
F-Type ( X152 )
12
May 31, 2019 06:56 PM
Jssaab
XF and XFR ( X250 )
3
Mar 17, 2019 03:03 AM
Cherry_560sel
XF and XFR ( X250 )
85
Apr 29, 2017 10:32 PM
AlexJag
XK / XKR ( X150 )
39
Dec 10, 2016 05:00 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM.