Manual take rate as low as 3% for F-Type
Truly a shame. People don't even want to be driving anymore, let alone deeply integrated into the process and machine. =( It goes suggest that if Jag phases out manual (no proof of that), the '16 will definitely be a classic. =)
New cars shift away from manual transmissions - Chicago Tribune
But a Jaguar spokesperson said the "take rate" for manual transmissions for its F-Type sports car—the only stick it offers, and available only in the base model with the V-6 engine—can be as low as 3 percent.
New cars shift away from manual transmissions - Chicago Tribune
But a Jaguar spokesperson said the "take rate" for manual transmissions for its F-Type sports car—the only stick it offers, and available only in the base model with the V-6 engine—can be as low as 3 percent.
I keep forgetting the R is only AWD here in the US anymore. The Tremec is only a solution for the RWD cars.
I've driven manuals almost exclusively and my CTS-V is a manual, but there is one reason I would be happy with a decent auto now and that is TRAFFIC.
Portland is becoming like LA and everyone is moving here. No matter what time of day anymore, even on weekends, you are almost always guaranteed a traffic mess and a whole lot of red triangles on your Waze app.
Sitting in stop and go traffic for 20+ mins a day with a manual gets old.
I haven't changed to 'liking' an auto - my environment has ....
Portland is becoming like LA and everyone is moving here. No matter what time of day anymore, even on weekends, you are almost always guaranteed a traffic mess and a whole lot of red triangles on your Waze app.
Sitting in stop and go traffic for 20+ mins a day with a manual gets old.
I haven't changed to 'liking' an auto - my environment has ....
Last edited by Burt Gummer; Nov 30, 2016 at 02:39 PM.
Trending Topics
My M3 was manual when I lived in LA. 2 hours on the 405 each way everyday was a killer. The occasional run through the canyons was fun, but didn't make up for the daily commute.
As for the Jag, my wife drives it more than I do so auto it is...
As for the Jag, my wife drives it more than I do so auto it is...
I drove a stick for years in DC traffic and still do when it snows and I drive the Taco. If JLR offered a V8 RWD with a stick I'd very likely consider it, but I'd have to find some way to appease the boss who has once again told me "no more cars!"
But I love to row. What is more is that it really acts as a pops and crackle control.... Love it so much.
I am such a big fan of the manual, I am thinking of getting personalised plates that read:
MNTRNNY
LOL
Last edited by Uncle Fishbits; Nov 30, 2016 at 09:51 AM.
Truly a shame. People don't even want to be driving anymore, let alone deeply integrated into the process and machine. =( It goes suggest that if Jag phases out manual (no proof of that), the '16 will definitely be a classic. =)
Glad I bought mine when I did.
Sad that the trade in I hoped to do in a few years for a next-gen manual F-type looks doubtful.
With such plates you might get confused with LGBT person from Minnesota.
If I could have bought my R with a manual I would have. However, let's can all that "people don't want to be driving anymore" nonsense. Just because we enjoy manuals doesn't make us any better than those who prefer autos.
There is one model car I would ONLY have a manual in and that is an R8. That gated shifter and the metal on metal tapping as you follow the gate - heaven. I guess they stopped manuals in 2015. Their dual clutch is a tech marvel, but there is no way in hell anyone should drive an auto R8.
I'm not anti-manual, but I just don't want one in my F type......some other vehicles, I would. I hope for the sake of those that want a manual, that JLR continues to make a manual F type.
With autonomous cars, cars that park themselves, etc. etc. etc.....I have to think that the interest in manual transmissions will continue to decline, unfortunately.
2 cents,
Dave
Out of curiosity I did a search on cars.com.
Today in the US there are 1912 F-types listed of which 1157 are 6 cylinder. Of those, 819 are RWD, and 91 of those have MT.
Of course cars.com doesn't list everything and it doesn't include cars ordered direct by customers, and doesn't account for rate of inventory turn, but roughly suggests a "dealer take rate" of about 11%, if you only count the models that can be ordered with MT, 7.8% if you add AWD as well, and 4.8% of all F-types.
If 11% is realistic, I wonder if the 3% stat is MT percentage of all F-types, which really wouldn't be the right way to look at it, would it?
Today in the US there are 1912 F-types listed of which 1157 are 6 cylinder. Of those, 819 are RWD, and 91 of those have MT.
Of course cars.com doesn't list everything and it doesn't include cars ordered direct by customers, and doesn't account for rate of inventory turn, but roughly suggests a "dealer take rate" of about 11%, if you only count the models that can be ordered with MT, 7.8% if you add AWD as well, and 4.8% of all F-types.
If 11% is realistic, I wonder if the 3% stat is MT percentage of all F-types, which really wouldn't be the right way to look at it, would it?








