F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Peak car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2025 | 05:49 PM
  #21  
bfrank1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 575
Likes: 301
From: Westport, CT
Default

Originally Posted by F-type-r-2022
You can really tell who really owns JLR products versus those who just make random commentary on car sites in between their lunch breaks at school. I need only open the hood on my F-Type R and see the parts marked FoMo (Ford Motor Company) on the engine. But the trolls lives revolve around AI, Wikipedia etc…which is truly sad.😔
What AI?
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2025 | 12:37 PM
  #22  
MajorTom's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 563
Likes: 331
From: Luxembourg
Default

Originally Posted by OzXFR
Do you know WHY so many parts on the AJ133 and AJ126 have FoMoCo markings? Obviously not.
Spoiler alert - I explain below.
It is NOT because those are Ford engines or contain any Ford engine parts, there are no parts on these engines which are interchangeable with any Ford engine except maybe the odd nut or bolt.
Back in 2009 when the AJ133 was designed (by JLR with maybe a little help from Ford engineers seeing as Ford owned JLR from 1998 to 2008), JLR made a deal with Ford to have the engine built in the Ford engine plant at Bridgend (England). On a special production line for only the AJ133 (and later the AJ126 from 2012 onwards).
It made economic sense for both JLR and Ford to use parts made by Ford in/at that engine plant so that's what they did. These parts were specifically and only for the AJ133 and AJ126 and have never been used in any other new engine let alone a Ford engine.
Then in 2020 this deal expired and JLR moved the manufacture of the AJ123 and AJ126 to their new multi-billion $ engine plant at Wolverhampton, but they continued to use parts stamped FoMoCo.
This. In all fairness the engines have a bunch of internal and ancillary pieces with FoMoCo stamped on them but nonsense about being Ford based or having a Ford block usually comes from clueless people who know nothing about Jags, so it's extra laughable when it comes from someone who actually owns an F-Type with one of these engines. I guess it mainly comes from the fact that there was a period of Ford ownership with more Ford components in some Jags of that era, FoMoCo being stamped on the oil filter housing etc, and the fact that the AJ133 has the same displacement as the Coyote. Time to put that misunderstanding to bed again, for the millionth time.

Not that there's anything wrong with Ford engines but for some reason Jag owners tend to be a bit sensitive to this. If you want to get flamed on any Jag forum, start talking about Ford engines or how unreliable Jags are because of the Lucas electrics.

Anyways, the F-Type is a brilliant example of peak car and IMHO peak F-Type was right after the MY18 facelift, before the gas particulate filters.

 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2025 | 12:55 PM
  #23  
F-type-r-2022's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 224
Likes: 51
Default

Originally Posted by OzXFR
Do you know WHY so many parts on the AJ133 and AJ126 have FoMoCo markings? Obviously not.
Spoiler alert - I explain below.
It is NOT because those are Ford engines or contain any Ford engine parts, there are no parts on these engines which are interchangeable with any Ford engine except maybe the odd nut or bolt.
Back in 2009 when the AJ133 was designed (by JLR with maybe a little help from Ford engineers seeing as Ford owned JLR from 1998 to 2008), JLR made a deal with Ford to have the engine built in the Ford engine plant at Bridgend (England). On a special production line for only the AJ133 (and later the AJ126 from 2012 onwards).
It made economic sense for both JLR and Ford to use parts made by Ford in/at that engine plant so that's what they did. These parts were specifically and only for the AJ133 and AJ126 and have never been used in any other new engine let alone a Ford engine.
Then in 2020 this deal expired and JLR moved the manufacture of the AJ123 and AJ126 to their new multi-billion $ engine plant at Wolverhampton, but they continued to use parts stamped FoMoCo.
In other words: Ford based. Never said anything about
parts appearing elsewhere as if it’s something bad. I CURRENTLY have TWO of these engines because of the FORD association. The supercharger maybe unique to the engine too, so are you then banned from giving credit to that manufacturer ???☮️

 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2025 | 05:22 PM
  #24  
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 9,020
Likes: 3,658
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Default

Originally Posted by F-type-r-2022
In other words: Ford based. Never said anything about
parts appearing elsewhere as if it’s something bad. I CURRENTLY have TWO of these engines because of the FORD association. The supercharger maybe unique to the engine too, so are you then banned from giving credit to that manufacturer ???☮️
I don't think you understand the meaning of "Ford based"!
And the Eaton TVS R1900 is commonly fitted to several engines not just the AJ133, including Ford, GM and Jeep.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2025 | 05:28 PM
  #25  
F-type-r-2022's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 224
Likes: 51
Default

Originally Posted by OzXFR
I don't think you understand the meaning of "Ford based"!
And the Eaton TVS R1900 is commonly fitted to several engines not just the AJ133, including Ford, GM and Jeep.

If you take Ford out of the equation; you have NOTHING; which is why they went to BMW because they lacked the resources to make the 5.0 EU compliant.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2025 | 06:02 PM
  #26  
DMeister's Avatar
Veteran Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 708
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by F-type-r-2022
If you take Ford out of the equation; you have NOTHING; which is why they went to BMW because they lacked the resources to make the 5.0 EU compliant.
Good lord man, you’ve lost the plot. You figure stating a bunch of unrelated irrelevant things is going to magically make you right on this?

This is getting ridiculous now.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2025 | 06:15 PM
  #27  
AHarmlessDolphin's Avatar
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 55
Likes: 20
From: Savannah, GA
Talking

Originally Posted by F-type-r-2022
You can really tell who really owns JLR products versus those who just make random commentary on car sites in between their lunch breaks at school. I need only open the hood on my F-Type R and see the parts marked FoMo (Ford Motor Company) on the engine. But the trolls lives revolve around AI, Wikipedia etc…which is truly sad.😔
... and look under and see all the surface rust... err parts marked Tata
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2025 | 06:21 PM
  #28  
AHarmlessDolphin's Avatar
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 55
Likes: 20
From: Savannah, GA
Default

Originally Posted by F-type-r-2022
Peak car for JLR is 2018 for all SVR’s and Range Rovers and 2022 for F-Type R

Criteria:

1. Sound/V8 Ford based
2. Physical Buttons
3. Sound Systems
4. Infotainment
Coming from peak BMW these Jags have must stricter criteria.
1. Rod bearings
2. Vanos
3. Subframe separation
4. Oil leak
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turko
F-Type ( X152 )
0
Jun 6, 2025 02:46 PM
JensenHealey
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
13
May 1, 2023 08:45 AM
jbajor
F-Type ( X152 )
3
Nov 3, 2016 09:25 PM
Ubad2
F-Type ( X152 )
3
Sep 21, 2016 12:38 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.