F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards

Rim/Tyre/overall wheel size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 01:00 PM
  #1  
obald's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
From: New Zealand
Default Rim/Tyre/overall wheel size

Was cleaning my new(-ish) F-Type S Coupe last night and whilst doing the wheels noted the tyre sizes. I have the 20" Tornado rims and see that the fronts are shod 35/255 and the rears 30/295. The fact that the rears are massively wider than the fronts doesn't require reading of the numbers on the sidewalls or explanation, of course but why do the fronts have taller tyres? Doesn't this make the front wheels larger (in a diametric sense) than the fronts? Why is this desirable?
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 02:23 PM
  #2  
DPelletier's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 334
From: kelowna
Default

That's not how it works; on a typical tire (P295/30/20), it is the treadwidth in mm, the height as a percentage of treadwidth and then the rim size.

35% of 255mm = 89.25mm height

30% of 295mm = 88.5mm height......close enough to be considered the same


Dave
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 02:29 PM
  #3  
obald's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
From: New Zealand
Default

Well, you learn something every day. Thank you very much.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2016 | 04:09 PM
  #4  
nonsns3's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 34
Likes: 3
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by DPelletier
That's not how it works; on a typical tire (P295/30/20), it is the treadwidth in mm, the height as a percentage of treadwidth and then the rim size.

35% of 255mm = 89.25mm height

30% of 295mm = 88.5mm height......close enough to be considered the same
Dave
It is about the only thing in the world that is represented by three completely different units of measure: mm, percent, inches
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:01 PM
  #5  
DPelletier's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 334
From: kelowna
Default

No problem. :-)

Cheers,
Dave
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 04:06 PM
  #6  
DPelletier's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 334
From: kelowna
Default

Originally Posted by nonsns3
It is about the only thing in the world that is represented by three completely different units of measure: mm, percent, inches
Yep; very strange when you think about it.....still easier than the old system though; Tire Size Helper

Dave
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2016 | 06:43 PM
  #7  
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,948
Likes: 4,728
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by DPelletier
Yep; very strange when you think about it.....still easier than the old system though; Tire Size Helper

Dave
+1. Before the hybrid metric/English sizing, you couldn't calculate anything without tables . Now with simple multiplication and addition, it's simple to get a close approximation on most of the tire dimensions.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Daim
XJS ( X27 )
5
Sep 11, 2016 03:33 AM
Drcummins
XF and XFR ( X250 )
7
Sep 9, 2016 09:36 PM
Asdrewq
XJS ( X27 )
9
Sep 9, 2016 09:24 AM
James Tootle
F-Type ( X152 )
8
Sep 3, 2016 10:42 AM
davidboger
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
3
Sep 2, 2016 07:51 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.