MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

how to identify which straight six i have

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 08:58 PM
  #1  
silver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 3
From: Cold lake, AB
Default how to identify which straight six i have

so i am building a 1964 S type right now and im getting ready to pull the engine, and a few questions have come up in my mind about its size. so it seems the engine in the car has been replaced at some point because the original was shout out (there are literally bullet holes in the inner fender) some time before it came to canada. the badge says 3.4, the previous owner says 3.8, but the stamp on the side of the block say 4.2. though the fuel system seems to still be from a 3.8 as it has the dual su and not the triple. is there any way to know for sure with out just taking off the head and measuring the bore?
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 10:46 PM
  #2  
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 808
From: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Default

On my 340 and I am assuming on all Jaguars that have the 3.4 litre block, the displacement is in raised numbers cast right into the block.
This found on the "carburetor" side of the engine.
Isn't it the same for the 4.2 litre as well ?
A mirror and flash light should tell you.

And if you mean stamped or raised letters cast into the block and it they say 4.2, then it's a pretty safe bet that it would be a 4.2 litre engine in there.

EDIT:

Dug a bit and found a photo, I exaggerated the picture so you can just make out the 4.2 Litre numbers just forward of the Jaguar logo.
That's where it will be.


 

Last edited by JeffR1; Mar 7, 2016 at 11:03 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 07:52 AM
  #3  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,140
Likes: 2,662
From: Florida
Default

with the VIN of the car, you will know what engine it left the factory with, whether a 3.4 liter, or a 3,8 liter, and maybe the compression ratio.
If the Badge says 3.4, it was a 3.4.

The S type never had a factory 4.2 liter, the 420 that came after, and the XJ did, so obviously it was a swap.

go to the S type Register, join the Forum and David Reilly will answer.

by the way, I salvaged many parts from a 1964 S type that I found in the florida jungle.

Jaguar 'S'-type Register
 

Last edited by Jose; Mar 8, 2016 at 07:54 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 01:26 PM
  #4  
silver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 3
From: Cold lake, AB
Default

yes it has 4.2 in raised lettering on the side of the block.
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2016 | 04:23 PM
  #5  
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 808
From: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Default

It's a 4.2 litre block then and it has no business being in there, as Jose points out.
Personally if it was my car, I would use it, it's a heavy car, the more displacement the better.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2016 | 09:18 AM
  #6  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,140
Likes: 2,662
From: Florida
Default

Yes, the 4.2 will make a faster S type, not to mention it is the smoother engine of the 3 bores, otherwise it is the same block.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2016 | 06:49 PM
  #7  
redtriangle's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 414
Likes: 160
From: Australian Capital Territory
Default

Originally Posted by JeffR1
Personally if it was my car, I would use it, it's a heavy car, the more displacement the better.
Me too. Nothing beats cubic inches.
(Well, someone had to say it!)
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2016 | 11:31 PM
  #8  
silver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 3
From: Cold lake, AB
Default

ya i am certainly not complaining, im not one to turn my nose up at free displacement. though now i will have to find some badging to match it haha
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2016 | 11:44 AM
  #9  
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 808
From: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Default

A "4.2 S Type".
You'll most likely have the only one.
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2016 | 04:36 PM
  #10  
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 2,553
From: Crewe, England
Default

The 420, the last iteration of the Mark 2/S-type bodyshell, did, indeed have the 4.2 litre engine. Actually the smoothest engine of all was the 2.4 litre, but it wasn't powerful enough !!
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2016 | 08:42 PM
  #11  
JeffR1's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 808
From: Lake Cowichan BC Canada
Default

Shame on me _ I forgot about the 420, but it needed the bigger engine _ it was a big car.
The smoothest engine with the Daimler V8, but off course it wasn't a Jag engine.
What size of engine was in the MK X, I think it had the 4.2 in it as well ???
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2016 | 11:59 PM
  #12  
silver's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 3
From: Cold lake, AB
Default

well the s type is half 420 so i suppose i can have the engine too haha
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2016 | 05:02 PM
  #13  
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 2,553
From: Crewe, England
Default

Originally Posted by JeffR1
Shame on me _ I forgot about the 420, but it needed the bigger engine _ it was a big car.
The smoothest engine with the Daimler V8, but off course it wasn't a Jag engine.
What size of engine was in the MK X, I think it had the 4.2 in it as well ???
The 420 was about the same size as the S-type. There is the 420G, the successor to the Mark 10, which had the 4.2, the Mark 10 had the 3.8.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 09:09 PM
  #14  
Stoney85's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 341
Likes: 54
From: Bellingen, NSW, Aus
Default

It's quite possible the motor let go and they just replaced with the larger capacity one and reused the intake system for cost cutting measures.


If that is the case, might be worth checking the mixtures/air Fuel ratios to make sure its not running too lean, which could damage the motor prematurely. Unless the carbies have already been adjusted accordingly to suit the extra capcity
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
harvest14
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
21
Mar 18, 2016 09:49 PM
gabrielbecheanu
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
7
Mar 18, 2016 12:36 PM
Sonny van der Laars
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
8
Mar 10, 2016 08:33 PM
scardini1
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
4
Mar 9, 2016 01:41 PM
Philly Single
F-Type ( X152 )
1
Mar 6, 2016 10:21 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.