MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

Mk 2 front suspension setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 12:04 PM
  #1  
Doug Dooren's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 511
Likes: 173
From: Avon, Connecticut USA
Default Mk 2 front suspension setup

I have 2 aluminum spacers approx 5/16" think and no idea where they go. The bolt spacing matches the castor position at the upper ball joint so I suspect they go there? One each side? Forward or rear position or does it matter? Do these simply substitute for a bunch shims as needed or is there another purpose? Also, is there a base setup for the number of castor/camber shims when doing initial setup? Unfortunately I didn't record the existing setup when I disassembled the beast. Thanks for any info.
 
Attached Thumbnails Mk 2 front suspension setup-suspension-shims.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 12:26 PM
  #2  
rdssdi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 135
Likes: 7
From: earth
Default shims and spacer

This is the way I did it. I assume it is correct. Bob
 
Attached Thumbnails Mk 2 front suspension setup-100_2281.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 12:43 PM
  #3  
plums's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 2,201
From: on-the-edge
Default

There is always a set total thickness of shims, but they can be moved front or back
to set caster.

... sez the guy who's never seen one
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
Doug Dooren's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 511
Likes: 173
From: Avon, Connecticut USA
Default

Thanks Bob and rd - at the end of the day I guess the alignment guy will sort it out.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 04:33 PM
  #5  
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,547
Likes: 2,546
From: Crewe, England
Default

I have to say the set-up doesn't look correct to me - there seems to be far too large a thickness of spacers, but of course the modern sealed ball-joint may not be as wide as the old ones.

As said by Plums, there is a defined distance between the two arms of the upper wishbone, which the ball joint and spacers fill. Shims allow the ball joint to be biased to one side or the other to set the castor angle. AFAIK, there is, somewhere, the castor angle change per shim of a certain thickness.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
rdssdi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 135
Likes: 7
From: earth
Default

I consider it correct as I reassembled as it had been. That may or may not be correct. Bob
 
Attached Thumbnails Mk 2 front suspension setup-100_1733.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 05:21 PM
  #7  
plums's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 2,201
From: on-the-edge
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Dooren
Thanks Bob and rd - at the end of the day I guess the alignment guy will sort it out.
Hah!

It's quite common for alignment guys to add/remove shims on this setup.

That is wrong because it upsets changes the shape of the arm as a
whole. That would bind the inner bushes.

This setup is used up to and including the X300 and XJS, so there
should be someone around here that knows.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2015 | 09:42 AM
  #8  
redtriangle's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 414
Likes: 160
From: Australian Capital Territory
Default

Originally Posted by Fraser Mitchell
AFAIK, there is, somewhere, the castor angle change per shim of a certain thickness.
According to the Kriss Motors website (Front Suspn Part 3) a 1/16" shim equates to a change of caster or camber angle of 1/4 of one degree.

Apparently, if using modern radials, the recommended caster is 2-3 deg. +ve and camber angle 1 deg. negative. (have not tried these yet myself).
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2015 | 07:50 PM
  #9  
Doug Dooren's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 511
Likes: 173
From: Avon, Connecticut USA
Default

Thanks for the alignment specs.
I compared the width of the newer sealed ball joint with the original style and they're identical. I posed the question regarding total shim thickness to a friend on the left coast who as a young man was a mechanic at British Motors in San Francisco - guessing he followed the proper procedure hundreds of times in the day. Will let you know what he says.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2015 | 06:43 PM
  #10  
Doug Dooren's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 511
Likes: 173
From: Avon, Connecticut USA
Default

The official answer was "about half an inch - the precise measure isn't critical." Sure enough, when I measured the gap on the top end with fresh urethane bushings it was just over half an inch. If I tightened the castle nuts a bit further we'd be spot on. The idea is not to put any side load on the bushings.
 
Attached Thumbnails Mk 2 front suspension setup-castor-shim-width.jpg  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elithrift
Non-Jaguar Vehicles
3
Feb 28, 2016 10:24 PM
tassiejag
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
18
Jan 16, 2016 01:55 AM
SouthernGypsy
XJS ( X27 )
6
Oct 19, 2015 05:12 PM
Toney6211
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
5
Oct 19, 2015 03:16 PM
Dylj
X-Type ( X400 )
1
Oct 18, 2015 09:03 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.