MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

Original Spec versus Upgraded MK2 Engine Mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 09:26 AM
  #1  
MK2's Avatar
MK2
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 595
Likes: 68
From: Florida
Default Original Spec versus Upgraded MK2 Engine Mounts

Hello all,
If you have read my previous posts you know that I have already had one bad experience with front suspension mounts. The more expensive mounts made by Metalastik Trelleborg fit perfectly while the less expensive alternative did not fit well at all.

So now I have the choice between the original spec. Jaguar motor mount (the rubber biscuit) and the upgraded mount available from SNG Barratt. I was prepared to use the upgraded mount thinking once again that the more expensive option would also offer the best fit. However, when I measured the depth of the original spec mount it was 1.088" while the upgraded mount was 1.243". I am wondering if I will have trouble getting the engine to sit on the upgraded mount given the measured difference in depth.

Anyone used the upgraded mounts? Any problems?

Thanks
Lin
 
Attached Thumbnails Original Spec versus Upgraded MK2 Engine Mounts-upgrade-mount-top-original-spec-mount-bottom.jpg   Original Spec versus Upgraded MK2 Engine Mounts-original-spec-engine-mount-1.088-inches-deep.jpg   Original Spec versus Upgraded MK2 Engine Mounts-upgraded-engine-mount-1.243-inches-deep.jpg  

Last edited by MK2; Apr 5, 2015 at 09:27 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toronadomike
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
69
Jan 22, 2026 10:13 PM
D.K
XF and XFR ( X250 )
50
Dec 10, 2023 02:05 AM
OkieTim
Jaguar Forums Feedback & Suggestion Center
2
Sep 2, 2015 12:48 PM
XJsc-guy
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
Sep 2, 2015 11:43 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.