MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

Youtube S Type Test Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2020 | 11:10 AM
  #1  
paddyx350's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 561
Likes: 230
From: Wexford
Default Youtube S Type Test Drive

Here's a guy taking an S type from the Jaguar Heritage Trust for a test drive;
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2020 | 05:27 PM
  #2  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,140
Likes: 2,662
From: Florida
Default

very nice video. The hump inside the boot floor is to accomodate the rear inboard brakes, not the gas tank. The two gas tanks are each behind each rear wing.

If the doors are well balanced, you don't even have to push them shut, they close by themselves.

As far as the DG250 transmission, I find it to be primitive but quite effective. Third gear is almost like a Fourth gear, for highway speed, so you could say the forward gears are First, Second, and Fourth. Maybe that is the reason the "Second Gear Hold" switch was incorporated in the car, because Third Gear seems to be too "low" for city driving.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2020 | 05:40 PM
  #3  
jerry_hoback's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,265
From: Indiana
Default

I have been watching some of his videos. He has one where he buys a Daimler xj40 and another doing a tour of the Jaguar Heritage collection (albeit a fast one).
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2020 | 06:36 PM
  #4  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 1,495
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Default

Originally Posted by Jose
very nice video. The hump inside the boot floor is to accomodate the rear inboard brakes, not the gas tank. The two gas tanks are each behind each rear wing.

If the doors are well balanced, you don't even have to push them shut, they close by themselves.

As far as the DG250 transmission, I find it to be primitive but quite effective. Third gear is almost like a Fourth gear, for highway speed, so you could say the forward gears are First, Second, and Fourth. Maybe that is the reason the "Second Gear Hold" switch was incorporated in the car, because Third Gear seems to be too "low" for city driving.
Yes ~ the boot hump accommodated the entire IRS bridge piece. As you say the twin gas tanks are in the wings like the MkX/420G. He's a bit optimistic with the 2 carb 3.8 engine power. It was 220bhp (SAE) ~ only 10 more than the 3.4 although that did not tell the whole story with the greater torque of the 3.8. I don't quite buy the poor sales pop up of the S Type & 420 as being the reason for maintaining the Mk2. Rather it allowed Lyons to practice his niche pricing over a more broad range of models & kept competition like Rover out. Mk2 sales fell precipitously from 62/63 onward from the previous sales highs. But at least they enjoyed sales they might not have had as the S Type & 420 bridged the way to the XJ6.

I think the S Type styling has stood the test of time over Cyril Crouch's initial reservations & is reflected in their value over the 420 today. Radio was not standard. It was an optional extra.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Oct 31, 2020 at 06:50 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2020 | 05:44 AM
  #5  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,140
Likes: 2,662
From: Florida
Default

Glyn, I think what most people first "see" and dislike in the S type are the rear wing wheel openings.
Compared to the MK-1 and MK-2 they are not as attractive, but they are the pattern that started with the E type, and the MK-X, then the S type and 420, then the 420-G, and then the Series 1, 2, and 3 XJ. The rear wing full wheel opening pattern of the MK-1 and MK-2 was not replicated in any future Jaguar.

In the US some S type owners have modified the rear wings to copy the MK-2 openings but it still does not work because of the longer length of the S type's rear third of the body.
To each his own, I could have had a MK-2 but decided on the S type because of the rear IRS and twin tanks. It simply rides better.
​​​​​​
My decision was also influenced by my XJ-6 which has been a wonderful ride for the last 30 years.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AL NZ
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
2
Apr 8, 2017 08:52 PM
bendougy
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
17
Jan 21, 2017 06:14 PM
Executive
F-Type ( X152 )
7
Feb 13, 2014 11:08 AM
josh_77073
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
5
May 31, 2013 11:54 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.