S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Do you stop using premium fuel at $4 gallon? $5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 10:29 AM
  #41  
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,356
Likes: 2,235
From: Berlin Md.
Default

If I recall correctly the middle grade at Exxon is 89octane and I used it for years in both my xk8 & 3.0 S-Type without any noticeable problems. I cannot tell you when I purchased premium octane. Just my .02¢
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 10:43 AM
  #42  
Tiberious's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
From: Greenfield MA
Default

I agree with the suggestions of cost: the difference isn't insurmountable. Additionally, if you don't care about performance, you could always sell it, buy a cheap beater for around town, and pocket enough cash to fuel that car for a solid year.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 10:55 AM
  #43  
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,057
Likes: 2,272
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by JOsworth
OK, my 2 cents....

The other thing I noticed, since I used cheap fuel, is that a catalytic converter died in my car at about 60 to 65k miles. Very strange.. I think the cheap fuel with ethanol in it was the culprit. So, I changed to a "better" brand that claimed they use very little ethanol.



let the flaming begin... LOL
No flaming needed- you're pretty much spot on and thank you for the compliment.

The failure of your catalytic perverter would not have been due to presence of the ethanol in E10 or lower octane levels. For all it's other failings E10 is actually kinder and gentler fuel on cats than gasoline. I can only presume that your difficulties were just a coinkydink. All my cars and other toys have had a steady diet of E10 since day one with no problems.

On another favourite topic- there is no correlation between octane levels and 'quality' of fuels. Given that the vast majority of vehicles here run on regular (87ish) octane gas, and that there's no real relevant mechanical differences between a low perf motor and a high perf., why don't the low perf cars suffer from issues if the 'quality' of the fuel was inadequate?

As a classic example- remember that the fuel injectors are OUTSIDE of the combustion chambers and upstream of the intake valves. They have no idea what's going on downstream, and couldn't care less. Why do they not clog on low perf cars using 87 octane fuel, but supposedly would on a high perf. car when fueled with the same 87 octane 'low quality fuel'?
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 11:53 AM
  #44  
carelm's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 168
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

Originally Posted by JOsworth
OK, my 2 cents....

I trust users like Mikey because of their vast experience in this kind of stuff. Like he has said in general, you won't kill your motor running lower octane fuel.. BUT... Here is my experience. I only ran what was recommended for my 3.0 when I had it. I will admit that I tried lower octane once.. and though I thought it was down on performance..that was probably just a mind trick. What I did measure was a reduction in fuel economy. So, any savings gained with a lower per gallon cost was eliminated by an increase in consumption. So, back to premium I went. The other thing I noticed, since I used cheap fuel, is that a catalytic converter died in my car at about 60 to 65k miles. Very strange.. I think the cheap fuel with ethanol in it was the culprit. So, I changed to a "better" brand that claimed they use very little ethanol.
Jeff,

I tried running the Sunoco 93 octane ultra a couple of times just to see if I noticed any difference in performance or economy. I didn't notice any difference in performance. When I tried measuring economy, it seemed everytime I tried it, there was an accident or other snarl in my commute route. I couldn't get a good reading. Switching back to the mid-grade didn't seem to improve the accident rate though.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 12:00 PM
  #45  
Robinb's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 880
Likes: 182
From: BC Canada
Default

Deep breath, final thoughts:

All gasolines are NOT equal, octane is what really sets them apart.
Octane measures the ability of a fuel to resist detonation (knock).
Excessive detonation may eventually create the conditions for pre-ignition.
Detonation can cause long-term damage, pre-ignition can kill an engine in seconds.
When the ECU detects knock and adjusts the timing to avoid damage, there is a loss of efficiency and mileage.

Not a good idea to use gas with a lower octane than Jaguar recommends.

Not necessarily fatal either - if you drive the car like Miss Daisy you might even be able to get away with kerosene.

..and be careful with methanol – it is corrosive and should not exceed 3% (Jaguar manual).

I'm off to tickle an otter…
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 02:06 PM
  #46  
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,356
Likes: 2,235
From: Berlin Md.
Default

So what is the minimum octane that is acceptable in your opinion?
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 02:50 PM
  #47  
Robinb's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 880
Likes: 182
From: BC Canada
Default

My Jag manual says "at least 95 RON, up to 98 RON", implying an AKI of about 91 - 94. That's for a supercharged engine.

Could go less if the car is not driven hard.
Never hurts to go higher, except at the Bank.

Now where's that otter...
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2012 | 08:19 PM
  #48  
rasputin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 547
Likes: 101
From: USA USA
Default

Not to hijack the thread away from the octane wars (heard Costco was best for AZ), but $5.00 a gallon gas equals US recession. Without writing a novel, everything you own is transported to you, therefore your commute is not the only thing that goes up ~ everything you pay for will increase. So $5.00 a gallon gas for the US will make for a very interesting world.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2012 | 09:13 AM
  #49  
The Chris X's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,475
Likes: 129
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by carelm
jeff,

i tried running the sunoco 93 octane ultra a couple of times just to see if i noticed any difference in performance or economy. I didn't notice any difference in performance. When i tried measuring economy, it seemed everytime i tried it, there was an accident or other snarl in my commute route. I couldn't get a good reading. switching back to the mid-grade didn't seem to improve the accident rate though.
lol!
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2012 | 12:02 PM
  #50  
Staatsof's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 227
From: No. NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Michael Star
So wait, my magnetic fuel saver won't help me?
You can always sell it to me ...
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2012 | 07:50 PM
  #51  
Ferman's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Default

Different Octane Rating systems. Compare online. Regular in the US is over the reccomended 91 ROM in Europe.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 07:47 AM
  #52  
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 195
From: Akron, Ohio USA
Default

Originally Posted by Ferman
Different Octane Rating systems. Compare online. Regular in the US is over the reccomended 91 ROM in Europe.
While a true statement. The US owners manual states the recomended fuel is a minimum of 91 AKI not RON...
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 09:03 AM
  #53  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,522
Likes: 4,911
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

True. And minimum here in the handbook is 95RON.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2012 | 12:10 PM
  #54  
FloridaJag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 350
Likes: 14
From: Houston Area
Default

Since the cost difference for regular versus premium is usually no more than 30 cents, the answer is no. It amounts to maybe two dollars a tank. Big deal. At $3-5 per gallon, the difference far less than 10 percent.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2012 | 09:48 PM
  #55  
Ferman's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Unhappy

Just "fixed" (I hope, so far so good) the "engine fault/dsc not available/parkbrake" condition which seemed to come up a couple of weeks after I switched from Premium to Regular gasoline. I'm doing a complete 180 on this and sticking with the Premium.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 12:42 AM
  #56  
PantheraOncaSTR's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 4
From: Texas
Default

Don't hate me for taking a slightly different stance. I work for a company that services the oil & gas industry. The more fuel sold, the more created, the higher the prices go, it's all good for our sales. The more demand and higher prices just seem to increase our sales of support equipment. I pay whateve crazy price necessary for premium fuel and embrace it as job security. i suppose I'm part or the problem and not the solution.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 01:16 AM
  #57  
the beagle's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 2
From: sanctuary lakes Victoria Australia
Default

I dream of petrol at $5 a gallon
Oz prices: 98 octane $1.60 per litre or $7.27 per gallon!
middle octane 95 ron $1.40 per litre or $6.36 per gallon!
and these are the discounted prices, just take a breather and be thankful for small mercy's.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 05:37 AM
  #58  
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 195
From: Akron, Ohio USA
Default

Originally Posted by the beagle
I dream of petrol at $5 a gallon
Oz prices: 98 octane $1.60 per litre or $7.27 per gallon!
middle octane 95 ron $1.40 per litre or $6.36 per gallon!
and these are the discounted prices, just take a breather and be thankful for small mercy's.
I always get a kick out of these statements.. Now I'm not trying to pick a fight, but remember, a particular country's price structure for gasoline is based on many other factors other than wholesale price. See, everyone "pays" the same basic wholesale price (granted there are also the complicated issues regarding currency exchange) the great price disparity comes into play when governmental taxes come into play. I'm just saying, don't hate on the US just because we don't have huge fuel taxes. Again, I'm not trying start political debate, please.. I just felt the need to clear up what I see as a misconception.

Here are prices around the world... this is an old graph, not today's numbers




And here is a graph showing taxes on gasoline around the world (notice the US is on the bottom). Again, this is from a while back...



OK, I know the graphs I put up from the internet are a little dated... I wasn't looking for current accuracy, but more something to illustrate the situation.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 10:36 AM
  #59  
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 27,522
Likes: 4,911
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

You see our taxes.... and still we run a deficit (*)

(*) deficit = annually the government spends more than it gets, they're now trying to reduce the annual deficit though not to a surplus!
result: roughly a trillion GBP (that's over $1.5 trillion) national debt
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 10:45 AM
  #60  
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,057
Likes: 2,272
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Ferman
Just "fixed" (I hope, so far so good) the "engine fault/dsc not available/parkbrake" condition which seemed to come up a couple of weeks after I switched from Premium to Regular gasoline. I'm doing a complete 180 on this and sticking with the Premium.
So you're saying that low octane gas caused a dsc and park brake fault? I see no connection, sorry.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.