S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

V6 CHT readings vs. coolant temperature?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 08-21-2017, 10:48 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

I can only repeat that I really am almost certain it is not the CHT but instead has been scaled internally by the PCM to be ECT, unless you're reading the sensor volts using a meter and doing the calculation yourself.

(Yes, it's fitted as a CHT and internally the PCM can understand it as such but from OBD it will have been converted to ECT and probably the temp range changed.)

Adequate does seem reasonable!!
 

Last edited by JagV8; 08-21-2017 at 10:52 AM.
  #22  
Old 08-21-2017, 11:05 AM
kr98664's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,345
Received 1,981 Likes on 1,400 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
I can only repeat that I really am almost certain it is not the CHT but instead has been scaled internally by the PCM to be ECT, unless you're reading the sensor volts using a meter and doing the calculation yourself.
Nope, I'm reading straight from my generic scanner. We are all at a disadvantage because we don't know the exact details of how the sensor reading is converted for our viewing pleasure.

The only thing I do know is the needle climbs from center above 230F. I've extrapolated that as being the top of the normal band. I think I'm in a good place with the margin I'm seeing below that.

I tried one other thing for calibration, but it may not mean much. Before a cold start in the morning, with the engine off at least 12 hours, I checked the temp reading. Over several mornings, the displayed temp agreed within 5F of ambient air temperature, so that seemed pretty accurate. Now whether it's still accurate in the 200F range? I hope so.
 
  #23  
Old 08-21-2017, 12:32 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,643
Received 4,483 Likes on 3,901 Posts
Default

Sounds good enough.
 
  #24  
Old 11-18-2017, 10:28 AM
kr98664's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,345
Received 1,981 Likes on 1,400 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kr98664
The original CHT sensor was reading about 10% higher than the first OEM replacement I tried. I don't have any means to verify calibration. All I could do was compare resistance at a given temperature, using the pot of water on the stove. At 180F, for example, the original gave the same resistance reading that the replacement showed at 200F. Which was wrong? I tried a second new OEM sensor, but it landed between the other two. So I had two new OEM sensors off by 5%. That may not seem like much at first glance, but that's 10 degrees at 200F.
Update to an old thread. While searching for something else, I found a chart of resistance values for the CHT sensor in this document (Thanks Gus!), on page 24:

http://www.jagrepair.com/images/Trai...es/870B_SG.pdf



 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.