S-Type 4.2 Tire Size, oppinions
#1
S-Type 4.2 Tire Size, oppinions
What would the downside be of running a 245/45r17 vs the 235/50r17 on my stock 2006 Jaguar S-type 4.2 with stock 17 x 7.5 wheels.
Would the cornering performance be noticable enough to warrant the larger size?
I do think they would look better in the wheel wells, but need to know the positives and negatives.
Thanks,
Would the cornering performance be noticable enough to warrant the larger size?
I do think they would look better in the wheel wells, but need to know the positives and negatives.
Thanks,
#2
They have a smaller sidewall height so you will feel more bumps in the road and such. The extra 10mm in width really won't give you much more feel in the handling department. If you want better handling, you might consider going to a high quality, sportier tire with a higher speed rating and consider replacing your struts if yours are getting worn.
#3
I agree. The width difference is not enough that you will notice it. Not by driving and probably not by looking at it. The lower sidewall you would notice both by sight and feel. You will feel the road more. The bumps, the imperfections, even rocks. You would get better handling because the side wall is lower but only if comparing two tires of the same brand and model. You could probably keep the same size and enjoy the cushioned ride while adding a more sport feel by buying a better quality tire. You need a premium tire with a strong reinforced sidewall. Look for brands like Pirelli, Continental, and Bridgestone. They all offer tires with nice stiff sidewalls. Stay away from bargin brands like Falken and Kumho. There is nothing wrong with either brand as they both offer decent tires at a great price, but the sidewalls would not be as stiff to give you the performance it seems you are seeking.
#4
Thanks
I didn/t think there would be a huge difference. Stronger sidewall and about a 1/2 inch smaller radius. Possibly a more squared profile tire. Was also tinking about suspension options. Not sure what direction to go there. There is a lot of suspension theory on the internet.
(May see about running the R front swaybar, bilstein b6 or b4 shock and struts, and possibly new springs.)
(May see about running the R front swaybar, bilstein b6 or b4 shock and struts, and possibly new springs.)
#5
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,743
Received 10,757 Likes
on
7,101 Posts
Look for brands like Pirelli, Continental, and Bridgestone. They all offer tires with nice stiff sidewalls. Stay away from bargin brands like Falken and Kumho. There is nothing wrong with either brand as they both offer decent tires at a great price, but the sidewalls would not be as stiff to give you the performance it seems you are seeking.
Not trying to bust your b***s but that may be an over-generalization, IMHO.
All the the manufacturers you've mentioned offer a wide variety of tire designs. I don't think brand name alone guarantees a particular level of sidewall stiffness or casing strength.
Cheers
DD
#6
I didn/t think there would be a huge difference. Stronger sidewall and about a 1/2 inch smaller radius. Possibly a more squared profile tire. Was also tinking about suspension options. Not sure what direction to go there. There is a lot of suspension theory on the internet.
(May see about running the R front swaybar, bilstein b6 or b4 shock and struts, and possibly new springs.)
(May see about running the R front swaybar, bilstein b6 or b4 shock and struts, and possibly new springs.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gerard Radimaker
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
8
09-13-2015 10:33 AM
KarimPA
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
11
09-12-2015 08:15 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)