XF (X260) 2015 onwards

VelocityAP Jaguar XF Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #41  
Old 11-03-2021, 11:28 AM
Whoismootoo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 48
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

😲 well damn, might be worth hanging on to the XF with those numbers... was holding out on the urge to tune for a V8S F-Type but the market has been crazy.

What MY or Vin #'s have Bosch vs Denso?
 
  #42  
Old 11-03-2021, 01:42 PM
cnrad's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: California
Posts: 28
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whoismootoo
Check out the reviews on them, found to be mixed which is why I was hesitant for the price. VelocityAP also has the option for pops/crackles with the tune- which I would totally get if I was keeping the car long term. (416hp & 460hp with crank pulley upgrade If I remember correctly) lots of cars running this tune especially the F-types.

Paramount performance, Mina galleries, Spires, Arden, are some of the other options. After I had modified my exhaust I also found xforce varex & RRP which have controllable valves with respectable limited lifetime warranties that would also be worth a look/listen
Sweet, thanks for the leads. Definitely a lot more time needed for research. Just discovered the Sportbrake recently, so still a lot to discover about the aftermarket scene.

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
We have 200 cell sport catted downpipes set up for these now. In combination with tuning, pulley options, can get up to 660BHP on the Bosch ECU cars, and 600 on the Denso! Pretty aggressive on a stock exhaust, with sport cats.
That is crazy!! How reliable is the 600+ BHP package? And is that on 93 octane? The car would definitely be a daily, so I'd need it to last hahaha.
 
  #43  
Old 11-03-2021, 04:22 PM
DeviLSh's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 220
Received 131 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
We have 200 cell sport catted downpipes set up for these now. In combination with tuning, pulley options, can get up to 660BHP on the Bosch ECU cars, and 600 on the Denso! Pretty aggressive on a stock exhaust, with sport cats.
For the S/C 3.0 in the sportbrake? These look like AJ133s (S/C 5.0 V8) numbers not AJ126. But god would I love to be wrong lol.
 
  #44  
Old 11-03-2021, 04:54 PM
Whoismootoo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 48
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DeviLSh
For the S/C 3.0 in the sportbrake? These look like AJ133s (S/C 5.0 V8) numbers not AJ126. But god would I love to be wrong lol.
x2!!
 
  #45  
Old 11-03-2021, 04:56 PM
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,674
Received 825 Likes on 468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cnrad
Sweet, thanks for the leads. Definitely a lot more time needed for research. Just discovered the Sportbrake recently, so still a lot to discover about the aftermarket scene.



That is crazy!! How reliable is the 600+ BHP package? And is that on 93 octane? The car would definitely be a daily, so I'd need it to last hahaha.
Well, we have now done in excess of 3000 tunes on this engine platform, and well over 1000 pulleys. We did some conservative math the other day, probably 50 million customer miles driven. We've tuned enough cars that we have seen customer engine issues, but so far only what we'd call 'known OEM' issues - stuff that is known to fail on non-tuned vehicles.
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

The following 2 users liked this post by Stuart@VelocityAP:
cnrad (11-03-2021), Panthro (12-11-2023)
  #46  
Old 11-03-2021, 04:59 PM
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,674
Received 825 Likes on 468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DeviLSh
For the S/C 3.0 in the sportbrake? These look like AJ133s (S/C 5.0 V8) numbers not AJ126. But god would I love to be wrong lol.
660BHP & 660ft/lbs on the V8. 450BHP & 440ft/lbs on the V6. That's with lower pulley only on the V6. Up until now it hasn't been worthwhile doing an upper pulley on the V6 due to belt wrap/slippage issues with going much smaller. But we are about to realease a new option that will allow dual pulley on the V6, potentially going to see another 20BHP or so.
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

The following 2 users liked this post by Stuart@VelocityAP:
DeviLSh (11-03-2021), Panthro (12-11-2023)
  #47  
Old 11-03-2021, 05:44 PM
cnrad's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: California
Posts: 28
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
Well, we have now done in excess of 3000 tunes on this engine platform, and well over 1000 pulleys. We did some conservative math the other day, probably 50 million customer miles driven. We've tuned enough cars that we have seen customer engine issues, but so far only what we'd call 'known OEM' issues - stuff that is known to fail on non-tuned vehicles.
Wow, that's great! Very interested in your guys' tune for the S/C 3.0 when I find a Sportbrake.

Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
660BHP & 660ft/lbs on the V8. 450BHP & 440ft/lbs on the V6. That's with lower pulley only on the V6. Up until now it hasn't been worthwhile doing an upper pulley on the V6 due to belt wrap/slippage issues with going much smaller. But we are about to realease a new option that will allow dual pulley on the V6, potentially going to see another 20BHP or so.
Ahh, I thought the 600 sounded too good to be true for the V6. Still, the tune you have for the V6 gives great gains!
 
  #48  
Old 11-04-2021, 09:27 AM
JaguarJack12's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: New England
Posts: 38
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Stuart -- I apologize if this questions has already been asked/answered elsewhere (can'ts seem to easily find in other threads) -- Can you share your customers experience as it relates to warranty issues post tune on the AJ126? Does the tune (pulley and ECU mapping) void the drive train warranty?

 
  #49  
Old 11-04-2021, 10:54 AM
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,674
Received 825 Likes on 468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JaguarJack12
Stuart -- I apologize if this questions has already been asked/answered elsewhere (can'ts seem to easily find in other threads) -- Can you share your customers experience as it relates to warranty issues post tune on the AJ126? Does the tune (pulley and ECU mapping) void the drive train warranty?
We advise all our customers to assume that any modifications can potentially impact warranty coverage. A lot of tuning companies will give you BS about things being undetectable, which is untrue the vast majority of the time.

That being said, as we have now done something in excess of 3000 tunes on this engine platform, over 1000 with pulleys, we've had enough experience to see a variety of outcomes. There have been customers who have had known OEM origin failures that had them covered under warranty, despite being modified. We have also had customers with known OEM origin failures where the modifications were used as a reason to deny (or attempt to deny) warranty coverage.

Edit to add - it's not unreasonable to expect to retain coverage on unrelated components & systems. For example, if your window regulator fails and you have fitted aftermarket wheels, there's pretty much no way that your claim would be denied. Other areas become less black & white.
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

The following users liked this post:
JaguarJack12 (11-04-2021)
  #50  
Old 11-04-2021, 11:40 AM
JaguarJack12's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: New England
Posts: 38
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Thanks -

Forgive my ignorance, but I noted that tests were based on use of 94 Octane. Can this tune be run on 93? I assume the risk of exceeding tolerances is greater outside of the specs of your tests.
 
  #51  
Old 11-04-2021, 01:50 PM
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,674
Received 825 Likes on 468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JaguarJack12
Thanks -

Forgive my ignorance, but I noted that tests were based on use of 94 Octane. Can this tune be run on 93? I assume the risk of exceeding tolerances is greater outside of the specs of your tests.
93 Octane is fine. Our 94 Octane we tested on in Canada is probably worse than your 93 anyway. 1 point isn't an enormous difference. Even if you filled with 87, there's really very little risk of anything going wrong because of the way we tune. We don't remove any of the factory protections so if the ECU starts to detect knock, it will start pulling timing, eventually adding fuel etc. You can also use good quality boosters like Boostane Pro.

If you were pursuing our tuning and were interested in monitoring it we do also have a proprietary datalogger that samples at a super-fast rate and will allow (amongst 40 or so other PIDs) individual cylinder timing correction to be monitored: https://www.velocityap.com/product/j...oftware-cable/
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

The following 3 users liked this post by Stuart@VelocityAP:
cnrad (11-04-2021), JaguarJack12 (11-08-2021), Panthro (12-11-2023)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Johnny Mayday
XF (X260)
17
10-14-2018 05:30 PM
Kimochi
XF and XFR ( X250 )
5
03-28-2018 10:39 AM
RodTee XF
XF and XFR ( X250 )
7
05-30-2016 09:57 PM
Cambo
XF (X260)
1
10-31-2015 04:41 PM
glenonoka
XF and XFR ( X250 )
3
06-21-2014 12:09 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: VelocityAP Jaguar XF Exhaust



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 PM.