XF and XFR ( X250 ) 2007 - 2015

Is the engine cover necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2015 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default Is the engine cover necessary?

My engine cover was a bit on the broken side when I bought the car, and I'm kinda starting to really like the look of it without it on anyway. Is this going to hurt the car at all? What about the little insulation packets below?
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2015 | 09:01 PM
  #2  
2010 Kyanite XFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 427
From: DFW, Texas
Default Is the engine cover necessary?

Won't hurt anything to leave it off. It's cosmetic. Might make it a bit louder though.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2015 | 09:07 PM
  #3  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

Originally Posted by 2010 Kyanite XFR
Won't hurt anything to leave it off. It's cosmetic. Might make it a bit louder though.
That sounds suspiciously like a good thing. This car is way too quiet for the beast that lives inside.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2015 | 09:34 PM
  #4  
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 9,020
Likes: 3,658
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Default

Agreed, it's purely cosmetic and leaving it off won't cause a problem.
Some say that the cover traps heat and increases the supercharger intake temps and/or heat soak, but I understand that once you are moving and the revs are above idle the air flow through the supercharger negates both of these issues. However, when sitting at idle or after switching off there seems to be a valid argument that the cover increases heat soak and increases the time for the under bonnet temps to reduce.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2015 | 09:40 PM
  #5  
boiler's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 305
Likes: 49
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by OzXFR
Agreed, it's purely cosmetic and leaving it off won't cause a problem.
Some say that the cover traps heat and increases the supercharger intake temps and/or heat soak, but I understand that once you are moving and the revs are above idle the air flow through the supercharger negates both of these issues. However, when sitting at idle or after switching off there seems to be a valid argument that the cover increases heat soak and increases the time for the under bonnet temps to reduce.
That is why when I park it in the garage I always open the hood and take the cover off, no sense in accelerating the eventual decay of all the plastic in the engine bay.

I have run it on and off I didn't notice a large difference I might do it again tomorrow and log the temps with it on and off to see how it looks in the lovely Houston heat.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2015 | 10:20 PM
  #6  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

Cool. I think I'll run without and lose the little insulation bags.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2015 | 10:34 PM
  #7  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

Also, I seriously don't see how a plastic cover looks better than what's under it. I really like the aesthetics of it just being a raw, powerful engine. Seems to me they'd have been better off putting a little "SuperCharged" label on it or something and be done.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 08:53 AM
  #8  
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,057
Likes: 2,272
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

The covers are there to reduce engine noise as part of vehicle certification. I had the cover off one of my other cars last week and was amazed at the difference in sound levels.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 09:33 AM
  #9  
jackra_1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 6,264
Likes: 1,764
Default Cover off

I have been running without the cover for a while and the whine of the supercharger is louder than with the cover on but not too much. I got bored with the look of the Aluminum and decided to paint some of it black to help radiate more heat. I want to paint the "Supercharged" letters red but cannot find hi heat gloss paint for a reasonable price as yet.
 
Attached Thumbnails Is the engine cover necessary?-p1060862.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 12:29 PM
  #10  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

Originally Posted by jackra_1
I have been running without the cover for a while and the whine of the supercharger is louder than with the cover on but not too much. I got bored with the look of the Aluminum and decided to paint some of it black to help radiate more heat. I want to paint the "Supercharged" letters red but cannot find hi heat gloss paint for a reasonable price as yet.
I think that looks much better than the cover. Maybe that's the route I'll go too.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 12:30 PM
  #11  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey
The covers are there to reduce engine noise as part of vehicle certification. I had the cover off one of my other cars last week and was amazed at the difference in sound levels.
Yeah, I'll be happy to remove mine. I was also just looking at some of the posts about getting rid of the sound dampening on the intakes. That seems like a good idea too.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 02:41 PM
  #12  
jagular's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 283
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Default

And there's jaguar working so hard to eliminate that supercharger whine.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 03:37 PM
  #13  
TerryinNC's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 53
Likes: 1
From: Gaithersburg, Md
Default

I miss the whine. If that's the main function of the cover I'll probably remove mine (if I ever open the hood). I don't find the engine noise bothersome, just unnecessary. But the supercharger whine has character.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 04:34 PM
  #14  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

So I have some results to report:
It sounds great. More engine growl when you stomp on it and a bit more whine in the high revs. Dynamic and sport mode on made the car sound like a supercharged V8 should. I highly recommend it. It's not a huge, irritating difference and it's still quiet at low revs and idle, but when you want to hear it, it's there.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 04:48 PM
  #15  
10 XF Premium's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 675
Likes: 126
From: Davenport, Iowa
Default

My 5.0 N/A is very dirty/dusty under the cover, what are the issues of hosing it down (of course while cold) to clean it up a bit?
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 05:42 PM
  #16  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

Originally Posted by 10 XF Premium
My 5.0 N/A is very dirty/dusty under the cover, what are the issues of hosing it down (of course while cold) to clean it up a bit?
I used to do detailing and never had a problem with washing an engine bay unless the car had a distributor (haven't seen a distributor in a long while now). I would bet it's ok, but don't quote me on it. My mechanic insisted on doing the cleaning of my engine when I get a full service done, but he was probably just being nice after how much he charged me.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 06:19 PM
  #17  
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,057
Likes: 2,272
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

No engine is designed to have water from a hose directed at it. It's an ineffective way of cleaning in any event.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 06:25 PM
  #18  
damienedwards's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 274
Likes: 54
Default

Run mine with the engine cover........but.......i removed all the sound insulation from it first and put it back on.......get the aesthetic look of the cover but more charger whine......oh, the snorkel delete, drilled air boxes and k&n filters help alot too........

have as much charger noise as my wifes old 4.2 STR.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 07:11 PM
  #19  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

Originally Posted by damienedwards
Run mine with the engine cover........but.......i removed all the sound insulation from it first and put it back on.......get the aesthetic look of the cover but more charger whine......oh, the snorkel delete, drilled air boxes and k&n filters help alot too........

have as much charger noise as my wifes old 4.2 STR.
By snorkel delete, do you mean removing the cold air intakes at the top of the grill? And where are you drilling the airboxes?
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 07:13 PM
  #20  
n8ertot's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 417
Likes: 80
From: Salt Lake City
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey
No engine is designed to have water from a hose directed at it. It's an ineffective way of cleaning in any event.
I probably should have been more specific. I would use degreaser and scrub with a long bristled brush, then hose it off to rinse. Dry it with a towel and air compressor, then use a shiny treatment and it would look good.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.