An some surprising intake results
Be aware. You may not get what you pay for or what is promised by this guy. Many board members have had bad experiences.... You can get same type of intake system from trusted people also. If anybody needs details just ask directly from me. I like good guys, but I really hate bad guys. We are lucky since this board is full of good guys.
Last edited by XJR-99; Sep 28, 2012 at 02:48 PM.
Easiest thing to do is look here
Paragon Design UK - Jaguar XK8 & XKR Engine Detailing, Upgrades
I know its XK but the principal is the same....
Paragon Design UK - Jaguar XK8 & XKR Engine Detailing, Upgrades
I know its XK but the principal is the same....
This is a full pipe I did, however I did have to redesign the MAF body as on the 4.2s this type threw up a fault but on the AJ27 4.0s it was fine.... The MAF body would have to be a standard push in type if you have the AJ26 engine
I think I might have a go at making something like that but looking at the existing pipe it seems that the biggest obstruction to the flow is the design of the MAF. Mine has a LNC1620AA fitted is this exchangeable with any of the other Jag ones out there as lots seem to provide far less of an obstruction.
I'm assuming you have the AJ26 engine, it is possible to fit a MAF from the AJ27 which is far less restrictive but needs a little box of tricks to make it compatible, which cost a small fortune (about £300) you can get a large programmable MAF from the states like Avos uses on his twin screw supercharger upgrades..... A much better idea IMO
I know I am bringing back a dead string. Was the MAF housing diameter changed on the 3" and 3.5" intake tubes? If so a majority of the added hp is due to the fact that the computer is calculating less air than what is actually going into the engine causing a leaner than stock AFR. If the 3" and 3.5" tubes used the stock MAF housing or a stock diameter custom housing then this intake is amazing and simply allows much more air into the engine. If the MAF housing uses the same 3" or 3.5" diameter as the tubing, this intake system will screw with the ECU and not work with tuned vehicles.
I know I am bringing back a dead string. Was the MAF housing diameter changed on the 3" and 3.5" intake tubes? If so a majority of the added hp is due to the fact that the computer is calculating less air than what is actually going into the engine causing a leaner than stock AFR. If the 3" and 3.5" tubes used the stock MAF housing or a stock diameter custom housing then this intake is amazing and simply allows much more air into the engine. If the MAF housing uses the same 3" or 3.5" diameter as the tubing, this intake system will screw with the ECU and not work with tuned vehicles.
Is it just me or does it look like the stock air intake, particularly the inlet behind the headlight, look like it would be the greatest flow restriction? anybody ever drill a big hole or 2 in that tube?
Is it just me or does it look like the stock air intake, particularly the inlet behind the headlight, look like it would be the greatest flow restriction? anybody ever drill a big hole or 2 in that thing?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)









