XJ ( X351 ) 2009 - 2019

Which looks better- XJ or XJL ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 01:11 PM
  #21  
MackXJL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 76
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
Default

L!!!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2013 | 07:50 AM
  #22  
Deecutts360's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Bronx NY
Default

Xj-l
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2013 | 12:42 PM
  #23  
ExpatJag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 473
Likes: 49
From: Heidelberg Germany
Default

The XJL proportionately looks better IMO. And it was built that way from the start. They didnt take the short version and lengthen it. But if you have either you one fortunate person.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2013 | 10:35 PM
  #24  
JNB's Avatar
JNB
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: HK
Default

Xjl!!!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2018 | 06:57 AM
  #25  
lolshto's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 5
From: Tallinn
Default

I bought the XJL version.
I wanted the SWB first and thought that it looks better, but now I really appreciate the look of the L version and the extra leg room. The back doors are the same size as the front ones and it does look sleek.
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2018 | 09:12 AM
  #26  
JaguarJeffrey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 215
Likes: 75
From: Southwest
Default

I recall seeing somewhere that the original design was the XJL, and the shorter wheelbase was a modification of that design. As a result, the proportions are "correct" for the long wheel base version.
 

Last edited by JaguarJeffrey; Apr 10, 2018 at 08:45 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 03:41 AM
  #27  
roviw's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 753
Likes: 179
From: Hampshire, UK
Default

Jeff, that is correct, I posted some years ago about this, it was mentioned in an article when the X351 was launched that it was initially designed as LWB hence the doors being roughly equal proportions and then they adapted it to SWB.
Unlike the X350 that was initially designed as SWB and then adapted with longer rear doors to become the LWB.
When you look at the profiles of both the X351 and X350 you can then see this.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 08:03 AM
  #28  
TNJohn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 13
From: SE Tennessee
Default

I'll add another vote for the XJL. The extended length has flowing and graceful lines, where as the short wheel base looks sporty. From a comfort standpoint, I think knee room in the short wheelbase is absurdly lacking in a sedan of that size. That is the deal-killer with me over external proportions.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 12:13 PM
  #29  
XJ8JR's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 544
From: Spring, TX
Default

The LWB on the X350 was definitely more stately and elegant than the SWB. But I don't like the extra length on the X351, which I think is even bigger than the LWB X350.

I definitely wanted the SWB for my supercharged model as it looks much more sporty.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 02:13 PM
  #30  
Hank Scorpio's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 249
Likes: 38
From: South Carolina
Default

when i was searching, i definitely thought the LWB looked better from the profile view, like youve all said, it just flows better and looks more elegant. i love my SWB but i do agree the LWB just looks right, and doesnt seem like a longer version of the SWB, like the Audis and BMWs do.

i am also surprised at the lack of rear room when someone tries to climb into the back seat. it seems to be very close to my old CLS, which is ridiculous, and maybe even a slight advantage to the CLS since it had little knee cutouts on the back. However that is the ONLY way the CLS is better than the Jag.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 03:28 PM
  #31  
Freddy J's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 296
Likes: 83
From: Maryland
Default

I agree the XJL is the better design. A little more classier luxury look. The old axiom that a longer wheelbase meant a smoother ride probably doesn't hold anymore. However, I drive the short wheelbase for a different reason. I need that extra 5" in my townhouse garage. If you don't have a length constraint, go for the L.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 08:26 PM
  #32  
Hank Scorpio's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 249
Likes: 38
From: South Carolina
Default

the one i test drove was an L, and i checked to see if the rear windows went down all the way, because my dog likes to rest her chin on the window sill and she has stubby front legs like a T Rex, so this was weirdly important to me. i was surprised they went down the same amount as the SWB. So she at least gets half a window sill.

youd think with more door they could find more room, but im not a window scientist.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2018 | 11:50 PM
  #33  
dga57's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 301
From: Waynesboro, Virginia
Default

I no longer own my Jaguar but when I was shopping for it initially, I compared both configurations side by side at the dealership and, to me, the XJL's lines were sheer perfection. After that realization, I don't think I would have bought an XJ if they had offered it to me half price!

Dwayne
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 06:47 AM
  #34  
leadfoot4's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 557
Default

Given my "sporty" nature, I generally prefer shorter cars. However, the XJ is my wife's car, so she got to make the decision. Previously, we had a 2001 XJ8, in the standard wheelbase, and on occasion, when friends rode with us, going out to dinner, the rear seat area was a little cramped. Therefore, when we bought a new Jag, my wife wanted the long wheelbase car. In all honesty, I think I've seen only 1 or 2 of the short wheelbase XJs.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2018 | 10:11 PM
  #35  
missthang's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

The XJL hands down. It has a more sleek look to it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2023 | 02:48 PM
  #36  
7500ftJagGuy's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 24
Likes: 16
From: Evergreen, CO
Default

Subjective: XJL looks like a GranPa car imo.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2023 | 04:07 AM
  #37  
QP7's Avatar
QP7
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 332
Likes: 39
Default

XJL....
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2023 | 10:25 PM
  #38  
Daneel227's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 46
Likes: 1
From: Michigan, USA
Default IMHO

Loved my "black" 2005 XJ8L. In all honesty, when I acquired my 2014, getting a XJL Portfolio just seemed like a no brainer. There's really never anyone sitting in the rear of the vehicle, just my spouse and I up front. I just followed suit with what I had previously. However, when I see a "Black" XJL, it does make me think of a chauffer driven vehicle. My 2014 XJL Portfolio is silver and it doesn't remind me of a chauffer driven vehicle. 🤷🏻‍♂️ go figure.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2023 | 02:34 AM
  #39  
kamranki's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 59
Likes: 14
From: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Default

For the X351 model, I haven't seen a single XJ on roads here. All of them are XJLs, so yes, I prefer the XJL.

Maybe someone could do a side by side comparison with pictures?
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2023 | 06:21 AM
  #40  
christ's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 488
Likes: 193
From: Gosport
Default

Whichever is on your driveway.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.