XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 ) 1995-1997

Fuel Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 06:49 AM
  #1  
tsfo2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 13
From: Massachusetts, U.S.A
Default Fuel Economy

My 1996 XJ6 (U.S.version, 4.0L) gets about 27 MPG on the highway, but only about 16 around town. Just wondering how this fits with others' experience.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 09:35 AM
  #2  
FireCrow's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 477
Likes: 72
From: Ipswich, UK
Default

I guess it would be close enough average. I wouldn't expect a 1900kg car with 4.0l engine to very economical check out the thread about DIY engine modification, there's some figures there mate
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 09:46 AM
  #3  
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,535
Likes: 11,735
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

Originally Posted by tsfo2
My 1996 XJ6 (U.S.version, 4.0L) gets about 27 MPG on the highway, but only about 16 around town. Just wondering how this fits with others' experience.

Sounds about right to me.

If it makes you feel any better the supercharged versions fare substantially less well :-)

As mentioned, the weight of the car is a real penalty in city driving. Lots of energy needed to get the old girl rolling over and over again in stop-n-go traffic

Cheers
DD
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 10:30 AM
  #4  
tsfo2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 13
From: Massachusetts, U.S.A
Default

Yeah, I guess it is pretty much what you should expect, it's just that I never paid much attention to it before. Although I've had the car for 5 years it was never my daily driver until recently when I retired my 17 year old Buick Park Avenue. (It still ran great, but was rusting badly.)

Thanks for the responses.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 11:34 AM
  #5  
mikesmith2's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 326
Likes: 63
From: Reading UK
Default

I get about the same from my 3.2
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 12:22 PM
  #6  
Joe Reed's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 23
Likes: 2
From: Cordova TN
Default

I get a little better, but not much - 18.8 lately according to the trip computer.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 05:14 PM
  #7  
theJPster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 228
Likes: 64
Default

On a recent week long holiday (a day of driving to get there, pootling around town most days and then a day driving back again, via the JEC International Jaguar Weekend) I got 26 mpg (UK) / 21.5 mpg (US) out of a couple of tank-fulls.

I think my worst tank average was 19 mpg (UK) / 16 mpg (US) but we had left it idling quite a bit trying to diagnose a dodgy fuel pump.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 06:01 PM
  #8  
5tevie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 298
Likes: 30
From: Blackburn, N.W. England
Default

My standard 1995 XJ6 3.2 would drive you all green with envy.
I get 54 MPEM













MPEM = Miles Per Eighteen Months ...... It's a long story, lol
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2012 | 11:32 AM
  #9  
TopHatChef's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 26
From: South & Central Florida
Default

At the worst(ish) I've gotten about 15 mpg going about short drives in city traffic. On the highway I've averaged around 23 mpg (mind you this is doing 70-90+ mph).

All figures are subject to error due to my memory. The car used in testing was a 1997 Xj6L with 4.0 L
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2012 | 10:25 PM
  #10  
m5driven's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

So far, about 15 mpg is the BEST I have seen!

Hope I can quickly figure out how to improve MPG or purchase stock in Shell or Exxon...

Lovely smooth ride, however. Almost makes up for dismal inefficiency...
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2012 | 09:16 PM
  #11  
Suede's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 190
Likes: 113
From: Seattle, WA & Vancouver, BC
Default

The official ratings were 14mpg city & 21mpg highway. I only get 12.5 city(and that's babying the throttle), but get a whopping 28 hwy. A disparity that great puzzles the hell out of me. Anything I should be looking at, or is that pretty close to the experience of most?
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2012 | 10:41 PM
  #12  
aholbro1's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 1,656
From: Decatur, TX
Default

Sounds a bit on the high-side for hwy from my experiece. 24 is the best I've done on Strictly highway. My commute is about 50% highway and I get 20-21.5 depending on traffic and whether I idle a bunch - Kid school duty, maintenance or other such fragmetary orders as I may draw from time to time. I've never run an entire tank on city-only. I've put 60K + on it and the worst I've recorded is 18.1. Best 24.1. I used to average 21 1/2 but that has dropped about 1mpg with all the road-works on my commute.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
moff1959
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
Sep 26, 2015 05:35 PM
XKE73EIconverter
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
8
Sep 26, 2015 10:21 AM
reb1999
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
3
Sep 26, 2015 08:41 AM
BSM
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
0
Sep 25, 2015 05:00 PM
reb1999
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
1
Sep 25, 2015 10:00 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.