Errors from OBD but the CEL is not on.
#21
Jima- Terminals 3 and 4 refers to the zirconia oxygen element. Why they called it platinum, I am not sure of, but connecting a resistance meter to that circuit will damage it because the resistance meter passes a current throught he test leads to measure resistance.
The heater circuit is failrly low resistance (about 10 ohms??) on terminals 1 to 2, and I promise that it cannot be damaged by a standard ohmmeter
The heater circuit is failrly low resistance (about 10 ohms??) on terminals 1 to 2, and I promise that it cannot be damaged by a standard ohmmeter
Thanks, correct! I just found the schematics and saw that they were the element terminals rather than the heater terminals. Additionally, I saw that the element inputs and signal ground are all routed to the EMU with the signal at a steady 3.8 volts and and ground at SG (signal ground) at a steady 3.5 volts. My 'current' hypothesis is that this input is a constant voltage variable current input lifted off battery ground for reasons of noise immunity. If so a 'scope won't really show it so I'm back to square one.
What I'll do now is to test the heater element and if it is OK I'll replace the 'A' bank sensor and see what the error codes do.
Jim
#22
Bo:
The fault codes are recorded, so that should not be a problem. Your data might very well be available too so that you can see trends, which is what live3 data does for you. Poke around in the configuration for the scanner. Anything that SLOWS the scanner might help, since your scanner is polling the network, using up too much of resources needed by the car's modules.
The fault codes are recorded, so that should not be a problem. Your data might very well be available too so that you can see trends, which is what live3 data does for you. Poke around in the configuration for the scanner. Anything that SLOWS the scanner might help, since your scanner is polling the network, using up too much of resources needed by the car's modules.
#23
Well, I checked both upstream sensors and both have open circuit heaters. I also checked both downstream heaters and they measure approximately 6Ω so with 100% duty cycle drive they would be pulling about 2 amps which is in the ball park so I know I am measuring correctly. It seems the Jags pulse the heater circuits so it would seem that maintaining O2 sensor temperature is done partly by the exhaust gasses and partly by the heater circuits. I imagine this is especially relevant when the engine is cold. It would seem even with a cold engine the O2 heaters bring the sensors to working temperature in about 8 seconds.
P1646 and P1647 errors can be caused by heater element failure according to the book of DTC's so look like next step is replacement of both upstream O2 sensors.
Look forward to hearing your results too, Bo!
Jim
P1646 and P1647 errors can be caused by heater element failure according to the book of DTC's so look like next step is replacement of both upstream O2 sensors.
Look forward to hearing your results too, Bo!
Jim
#24
Finally - a resolution - fixed!
Well, a resolution finally! I took Misty in to the local Jaguar dealer for a 90K service and having explained the mystery of the non-illuminating CEL/MIL they readily agreed to do a full diagnostic read on their equipment at no charge (thanks, Stratstone!). I was relieved to see when I collected it that the only two codes which had turned up were P1646/P1647 which is exactly what my reader displayed.
I just had both upstream O2 sensors replaced today and having collected it and test driven it can report that a) it is much smoother and quieter at idle - in fact I thought I had another engine problem until I realised that what I was hearing was the engine of the Renault in front of me idling and b) the engine feels generally much more responsive and smooth, in fact seems to drive the auto box a bit better as well but that could be my imagination, I guess.
Putting the reader on when I got home I was delighted to see no stored or pending codes, just the usual P1111 'cycle completed' code and the engine was finally in Closed Loop mode - yay!
Displaying the O2 sensor output I have no more flat lines for the upstream sensors but nice, healthy activity on both sets. I have included an image of what this looks like on the EngineCheck screen during a 5-minute cruise to the off-licence (liquor store) to get some juices of the fruit to celebrate that my ECM is not toast for anyone interested.
In summary:
a) still no idea why the CEL/MIL light isn't on and neither does the dealer. I'm probably not going to bother following up on that one.
b) Contrary to some opinions here the EngineCheck reader was (and is) spot on! It doesn't cause any CAN issues, put the car in limp-home mode or bring about a plague of locusts. It doesn't cure cancer either but does seem to do a spot on job of displaying both generic and Jaguar error codes. As a bonus you can see what both sets of O2 sensors are doing and perhaps the Pro edition does even more. Kudos to Gendan and many thanks go to them for the great help Dean there gave me.
c) None of the 'classic' O2 waveforms I believed I was supposed to see after researching the 'net were anything like what actually showed up. The upstream O2 sensors appear to be constant voltage, variable current 'planar' types. Even my trusty Tektronix 7704A oscilloscope was of limited use.
d) Both of the upstream heaters were open circuit. Very odd. Since the ECM monitors the heaters on both sets of sensors it seems to have detected this fault and decided to ignore the pre-cat sensor outputs despite the fact that eventually they would have heated up. Of course, the working temperature would have varied wildly between idle and speed during driving so perhaps it was a design decision to ignore them due to the inaccurate readings caused by the faulty heaters. Of course, this is speculation on my part but the system never went into closed-loop mode with the faulty sensors.
d) Working O2 sensors are a must have - if you have any issues with a lumpy idle, rough running or sluggish throttle response get them checked fast - of course other faults may cause these symptoms but you can at least eliminate the sensors as a cause.
e) Finally - thanks to all who responded here. All ideas and contributions were very welcome and helped greatly.
Jim
There are some other displays of an '01 XJ8 4.0L here http://www.attfield.co.uk/gallery/jaguar/diags.htm
I just had both upstream O2 sensors replaced today and having collected it and test driven it can report that a) it is much smoother and quieter at idle - in fact I thought I had another engine problem until I realised that what I was hearing was the engine of the Renault in front of me idling and b) the engine feels generally much more responsive and smooth, in fact seems to drive the auto box a bit better as well but that could be my imagination, I guess.
Putting the reader on when I got home I was delighted to see no stored or pending codes, just the usual P1111 'cycle completed' code and the engine was finally in Closed Loop mode - yay!
Displaying the O2 sensor output I have no more flat lines for the upstream sensors but nice, healthy activity on both sets. I have included an image of what this looks like on the EngineCheck screen during a 5-minute cruise to the off-licence (liquor store) to get some juices of the fruit to celebrate that my ECM is not toast for anyone interested.
In summary:
a) still no idea why the CEL/MIL light isn't on and neither does the dealer. I'm probably not going to bother following up on that one.
b) Contrary to some opinions here the EngineCheck reader was (and is) spot on! It doesn't cause any CAN issues, put the car in limp-home mode or bring about a plague of locusts. It doesn't cure cancer either but does seem to do a spot on job of displaying both generic and Jaguar error codes. As a bonus you can see what both sets of O2 sensors are doing and perhaps the Pro edition does even more. Kudos to Gendan and many thanks go to them for the great help Dean there gave me.
c) None of the 'classic' O2 waveforms I believed I was supposed to see after researching the 'net were anything like what actually showed up. The upstream O2 sensors appear to be constant voltage, variable current 'planar' types. Even my trusty Tektronix 7704A oscilloscope was of limited use.
d) Both of the upstream heaters were open circuit. Very odd. Since the ECM monitors the heaters on both sets of sensors it seems to have detected this fault and decided to ignore the pre-cat sensor outputs despite the fact that eventually they would have heated up. Of course, the working temperature would have varied wildly between idle and speed during driving so perhaps it was a design decision to ignore them due to the inaccurate readings caused by the faulty heaters. Of course, this is speculation on my part but the system never went into closed-loop mode with the faulty sensors.
d) Working O2 sensors are a must have - if you have any issues with a lumpy idle, rough running or sluggish throttle response get them checked fast - of course other faults may cause these symptoms but you can at least eliminate the sensors as a cause.
e) Finally - thanks to all who responded here. All ideas and contributions were very welcome and helped greatly.
Jim
There are some other displays of an '01 XJ8 4.0L here http://www.attfield.co.uk/gallery/jaguar/diags.htm
Last edited by jima; 10-08-2009 at 05:18 PM.
#25
Bo:
The fault codes are recorded, so that should not be a problem. Your data might very well be available too so that you can see trends, which is what live3 data does for you. Poke around in the configuration for the scanner. Anything that SLOWS the scanner might help, since your scanner is polling the network, using up too much of resources needed by the car's modules.
The fault codes are recorded, so that should not be a problem. Your data might very well be available too so that you can see trends, which is what live3 data does for you. Poke around in the configuration for the scanner. Anything that SLOWS the scanner might help, since your scanner is polling the network, using up too much of resources needed by the car's modules.
#26
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Damon /Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,254
Received 2,183 Likes
on
1,355 Posts
Im not gonna read through all the replies but a quick answer, thsoe are both upstream 02 sesnro faults. He's the deal. The light may have been on at one point, but after so many key cycles/starts. If the ecu no longer continues to see the fault it will turn off the light and show the codes in history. Clear them and see if they return
#27
Im not gonna read through all the replies but a quick answer, thsoe are both upstream 02 sesnro faults. He's the deal. The light may have been on at one point, but after so many key cycles/starts. If the ecu no longer continues to see the fault it will turn off the light and show the codes in history. Clear them and see if they return
Jim
#28
Caution! Caution! Caution! Caution! Caution! Caution!
I can absolutely verify using the Autel MaxiScan MS509 OBD-II/EOBD Scanner initially everything looked Ok but then my 2003 XJ8 went int restricted/performance limp-home mode and reported a transmission/ACS failure and WS509 reported code 1642 (CAN error?). The next day exactly the same thing happened with my 2002 XK8!!!!!!
Seem to have fixed the problem by starting the car with the brake depressed, then clearing the codes with another scanner.
I can absolutely verify using the Autel MaxiScan MS509 OBD-II/EOBD Scanner initially everything looked Ok but then my 2003 XJ8 went int restricted/performance limp-home mode and reported a transmission/ACS failure and WS509 reported code 1642 (CAN error?). The next day exactly the same thing happened with my 2002 XK8!!!!!!
Seem to have fixed the problem by starting the car with the brake depressed, then clearing the codes with another scanner.
#29
Glad you found and fixed your problem.
Relative to the scanners - I think the fundamental issue is that our Jag is an overuser of the CAN bus and was somewhat poorly implemented. I have designed CAN bus systems in the past and have at least some knowledge here - IIRC the XJ has something like 32 processors, all trying share data space on the same bus. Not all scanners can handle this kind of data traffic without choking and not working, or worse, causing CAN bus collisions themselves, leading to spurious readings.
One of the stickies in this forum, again, if I recall, has a list of scanners that forum members have had the most success with.
Relative to the scanners - I think the fundamental issue is that our Jag is an overuser of the CAN bus and was somewhat poorly implemented. I have designed CAN bus systems in the past and have at least some knowledge here - IIRC the XJ has something like 32 processors, all trying share data space on the same bus. Not all scanners can handle this kind of data traffic without choking and not working, or worse, causing CAN bus collisions themselves, leading to spurious readings.
One of the stickies in this forum, again, if I recall, has a list of scanners that forum members have had the most success with.
Last edited by QuadManiac; 03-25-2012 at 03:57 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KarimPA
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
8
09-27-2015 08:46 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)