Doug
Veteran Member
close
- Join DateMar 2008
- LocationPacific Northwest USA
- Posts:25,529
-
Likes:5,676
-
Liked:11,724 Times in 7,587 Posts
Looks like a 240 or 340 to me, due to the thin bumpers. This was a variation on the Mark 2
1967-68?
The model designations were tricky at that time
I'm not an authority
Cheers
DD
1967-68?
The model designations were tricky at that time
I'm not an authority

Cheers
DD
Darrenmb
Veteran Member
close
- Join DateOct 2010
- LocationOrlando Florida
- Posts:2,448
-
Likes:110
-
Liked:1,269 Times in 519 Posts
wife said no more projects until i finish kitchen!!
so here's why i was asking about car...
Jaguar 1950 something
so here's why i was asking about car...Jaguar 1950 something
Fraser Mitchell
Veteran Member
close
- Join DateDec 2009
- LocationCrewe, England
- Posts:9,548
-
Likes:19
-
Liked:2,548 Times in 2,021 Posts
It's likely to be a 340, because I don't think the 240 was exported to the USA. 240=2.4 litre engine, 340=3.4 litre engine. Photo seems to show something of a dog, but you won't know until a detailed examination is undertaken. If restoration is done on a DIY basis, you'd probably get your money back, (like I did in 1988 with a 2.4 Mark 2), but paying somebody to do it ? No !
Photos in your link show a non-Mark 2 dash, being that from a 420, I reckon. Hood lookd completely shot, so probably the rest of the car is too.Interior is shot, and its probably got a V8b lump in it.Not really worth anything at all, and the $2995 being asked is a con trick IMHO.
Would I have a Mark 2 back if I could - Yes, but I've nowhere to put it, unfortunately, and it wouldn't be that one !!
Photos in your link show a non-Mark 2 dash, being that from a 420, I reckon. Hood lookd completely shot, so probably the rest of the car is too.Interior is shot, and its probably got a V8b lump in it.Not really worth anything at all, and the $2995 being asked is a con trick IMHO.
Would I have a Mark 2 back if I could - Yes, but I've nowhere to put it, unfortunately, and it wouldn't be that one !!





