XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III 1968-1992

MAF Issue?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2017 | 03:48 PM
  #1  
Joel Moross's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 3
From: ashcroft, BC
Default MAF Issue?

1989 xj6 3.6L

I can not get the idle down to a reasonable level. 700 - 800 rpm


throttle is set at .002

TPS is at .300 volt

when i Pinch off the breather hose i can manipulate the idle and even stall the engine.

i have also checked for secondary fuel.

what is going on??
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2017 | 05:46 PM
  #2  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,135
Likes: 2,656
From: Florida
Default

sounds like you have a XJ-40, not a XJ-6, although every Jaguar sedan is called a XJ-6.

this forum is for the XJ-6 from 1968 to 1987.

try the XJ-40 forum, look for it at the top of the page where it says "FORUMS".
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2017 | 09:53 PM
  #3  
cat_as_trophy's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 1,646
From: Regional NSW, Australia
Default

Hi Jose . . . I too, see and try to respond to this continuing misunderstanding of XJ6 and XJ40. So, can I help extend the understanding a bit . . . even if I might sound a bit pedantic.

For the 6cyl Series I, II, and III that finished in 1987 (XJ12 continued, but irrelevant here), Jaguar produced cars listed and badged as XJ6. However, unlike today's markets where manufacturers vie for how many brand, model and variant badges they can fit onto each new car, there is some evidence that Jaguar, while preserving their brand badging, wanted to focus more on the posh value of the premium variants.

From 1988 to 1994, Jaguar produced cars listed as XJ40 (incorrectly known by some as a Series IV XJ6), but badging was varied . . . "XJ6" became badging for the base variant; "Sovereign" badging for superior variant; and "Vanden Plas" badging reserved for the premium variant. Line up a large number of similar year but different variant XJ40s and observe the rear panel badging . . . "XJ6" will dominate, but disappear if a "Sovereign" or "Vanden Plas".

None of this cuts any ice with vehicle registration authorities to whom all these cars are simply grouped as "XJ6". No wonder new owners of these cars are confused.

Cheers,

Ken
 
Reply
Old May 28, 2017 | 03:46 AM
  #4  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,135
Likes: 2,656
From: Florida
Default

Hi Ken,

true there isn't such a thing as "Series 4", I think the "series" thing stopped with the Series 3 XJ-6 and Series 3 XK-E.

but it sure helps me and some others to call the XJ-40 a "Series 4", if only to classify the models in these forums, since as you say, the vehicle registration authorities see all Jaguar Sedans as "XJ-6". It really is not the car owners' fault that they end up in this forum.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2017 | 07:51 AM
  #5  
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,521
Likes: 11,713
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

I'm reminded of the days....1980s-90s.... when Oldsmobile took advantage of the ever-popular "Cutlass" name and applied it to several very different cars simultaneously. Cutlass Supreme (W-body platform), Cutlass Calais (N-body platform) and Cutlass Classic (G-body platform).

Cheers
DD
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2017 | 07:59 AM
  #6  
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,521
Likes: 11,713
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

Originally Posted by cat_as_trophy
For the 6cyl Series I, II, and III that finished in 1987 (XJ12 continued, but irrelevant here), Jaguar produced cars listed and badged as XJ6.

Further complicating the confusion is that many parts vendors (and otherwise knowledgeable Jag enthusiasts) think 1986 marked the end of the Series III XJ6. They don't acknowledge that the Series III XJ6 production continued on well into 1987 calendar year, April to be specific.

Cheers
DD
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2017 | 08:25 AM
  #7  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,135
Likes: 2,656
From: Florida
Default

not to mention that in these forums, the 420 (1966-1968) is not even included, the shortest production Jaguar ever.

a very interesting car if you've ever driven one, it's essentially an S type (Small Saloon) but with a 4.2 liter carbed XK engine and different front grille/nose. It also has a Dash that established the XJ-6 dash style from 1968 until 1987 / 1992 V12 S3.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2017 | 06:05 AM
  #8  
cat_as_trophy's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 1,646
From: Regional NSW, Australia
Default

Hi Jose,

My skin crawls when, every few days, I pass a 420 here that looks like it was modded in the witching hours of darkest winter by Cousin It of the Adams Family. Matt dark graphite in colour, lowered suspension, a wide muti-port airscoop protruding up through bonnet/hood, flared guards barely enfolding very wide custom wheels and wide, low profile rubber. I find myself cringing as I pass by, wondering if it is haunted by its original owner.

Cheers,

Ken
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2017 | 06:15 AM
  #9  
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,135
Likes: 2,656
From: Florida
Default

haha! don't blame the car, blame the owner!! The 420 is not the best looking Jaguar, at least the front isn't, but it is a Jaguar and a rare one.
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.