XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

Daily driver lump?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-09-2012, 12:56 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 76
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Daily driver lump?

I'm starting to see the attraction in lumping a older XJ-S. The flathead pre-HE just doesn't lend itself to daily driver duty. What other engines would be a good fit? I'm thinking +300HP, +25mpg, including rwd +4speed automatic. That's from the factory, no modifications needed.

Ford's new "ecoboost" 3.7 V6 looks like a good candidate.
305HP, 280FTLBS, 31MPG, 6 speed automatic.
Fords new "5.0" also just makes the economy criteria.
412HP, 390TQ, 26MPG, 6 speed auto.
Porsche GTS 3.8Liter for grins....
408HP, 310FTLBS, 25MPG.
Nissan 370Z - a few years in production.
3.7liter, 332HP, 270FTLBS, 7 speed automatic.
Audi S4
3.0liter, 333HP, 325FTLBS, 28MPG... except AWD trans!
Any others, preferably available used?
 
  #2  
Old 01-09-2012, 01:27 PM
Flint Ironstag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,162
Received 413 Likes on 311 Posts
Default

Be prepared to open up your wallet if you're trailblazing. I would stick with a proven package, such as provided by Johns Cars in Dallas.

Jaguar conversions, swaps, parts, service and advice - from John's Cars in Dallas.
 
  #3  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:21 PM
Darel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mountaintop, PA
Posts: 345
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

You'll never recoup the fuel savings and the blow to resale with what you save on fuel. Save a Jag, sell it and buy another car.
 
  #4  
Old 01-09-2012, 02:28 PM
warrjon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vic Australia
Posts: 4,638
Received 2,576 Likes on 1,712 Posts
Default

What about a Jaguar XJR supercharged I6 320hp 378tq and 21mpg this would as easy as an LS1 conversion as the AJ6 was used in the XJS. The money saved over engineering something custom would give you many years of fuel.

Anything other than what is available from places like Johns Cars, Jaguar Specialties or Jaguar would require custom engineering. Mounting an engine is not just a matter of building mounts and plonking it in - it needs to be lined up so pinion angle is correct and the engine is central, otherwise you will end up with vibration. Then there is integrating the newer engines ECU and BCM into the XJS if it not an engine that has been used in conversions before you will require custom modification of the ECU to ignore the BCM as most have some kind of security that prevents the engine from starting without the correct inputs from all of the other onboard computers.
 
  #5  
Old 01-09-2012, 03:41 PM
JameyXJ6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,054
Received 189 Likes on 160 Posts
Default

If you really want an XJS lump, someone from Seattle just posted here in the XJS section with a lumped convertible, asking how much it was worth because they need to sell it.
 
  #6  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:12 PM
Flint Ironstag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,162
Received 413 Likes on 311 Posts
Default

Here's the thread JameyXJ6 is talking about:

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...ertible-66308/

Already lumped, been sitting for 4 years. Might just need a battery & fuel system flush.
 
  #7  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:32 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 76
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darel
You'll never recoup the fuel savings and the blow to resale with what you save on fuel. Save a Jag, sell it and buy another car.
I appreciate the concern but that math doesn't add up. In my case this is as opposed to buying a new car. The payments, full coverage insurance, gap coverage, and so on cover an awful lot of gasoline. Since the XJ-S is going to be restored anyway, it's a sunk cost and doesn't apply. The different engine costs would.

Looking into other Jaguar engines was my next bit of research. Jaguar XJR supercharged I6 320hp 378tq and 21mpg sounds pretty good. Rare as hens teeth?

The multiplicity of computers and sensor inputs from undesirable areas (ABS, or anything else the '78 doesn't have) would definitely rule out some engines.

Never have liked convertibles, but thanks for the tip.
 
  #8  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:34 PM
Darel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mountaintop, PA
Posts: 345
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I wasn't referring to a new car. You can't compare a 30-year-old car to a new car in any plane. Leave the Jag as-is and get a $500 Hyundai for a daily driver.
 
  #9  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:36 PM
Darel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mountaintop, PA
Posts: 345
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I DO think it would be neat to put a newer Jag motor in.
 
  #10  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:46 PM
Mish_Mish's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 883
Received 169 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

I own 2011 F-150 FX4 with "Ford's new "ecoboost" 3.7 V6 looks like a good candidate", BTW, it is 3.5L, not 3.7 and it is amazing. One thing though, you ain't gonna find one cheap, however if you did, 6 speed ZF transmission on it is almost the same as on 2003+ XK8/XKR, plus one extra clutch disk per all 6 speeds.
 
  #11  
Old 01-09-2012, 07:25 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,739
Received 10,749 Likes on 7,100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by derherr65
Looking into other Jaguar engines was my next bit of research. Jaguar XJR supercharged I6 320hp 378tq and 21mpg sounds pretty good. Rare as hens teeth?


About 6500 were built. I think half that came to the USA.


The multiplicity of computers and sensor inputs from undesirable areas (ABS, or anything else the '78 doesn't have) would definitely rule out some engines.


Or at least really complicate things.

The supercharged XJR/6 engine is a difficult swap into an XJS for physical fit reason, as well.

You might wanna just buy an XJR outright. Before buying an XJR I had both and XJS and an XJ6. I found the XJR replaced both very well, combining luxury and performance.

I still miss the other two, though.

Cheers
DD
 
  #12  
Old 01-09-2012, 07:39 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 76
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Whoops, meant "3.7L Ti-VCT V-6 Engine", the mustang engine. Thought I saw ecoboost.
 
  #13  
Old 01-09-2012, 08:17 PM
Mish_Mish's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 883
Received 169 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Just go simple, get nice 3.0l Supra turbo JDM motor + trans and you will love the result. I believe it was done with XJS and TH400 before.
 
  #14  
Old 01-10-2012, 06:32 AM
derherr65's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 76
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darel
get a $500 Hyundai for a daily driver.
That does probably make the most sense economically. But life is too short for boring cars, and I drive a lot. 30,000 miles a year or so.
 
  #15  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:16 AM
MustangSix's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: orlando, FL
Posts: 183
Received 41 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Jaguar : XK Jaguar : XK | eBay

Something like this XK8 would be less than the cost of lumping an XJS.

IMO, the pre-HE XJS will likely be more collectible than the more common HE versions. And once you lump it, they become very hard to sell. There are a LOT of them to be found already at giveaway prices.
 
  #16  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:54 AM
carelm's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 3,327
Received 166 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by derherr65
I appreciate the concern but that math doesn't add up. In my case this is as opposed to buying a new car. The payments, full coverage insurance, gap coverage, and so on cover an awful lot of gasoline. Since the XJ-S is going to be restored anyway, it's a sunk cost and doesn't apply. The different engine costs would.

Looking into other Jaguar engines was my next bit of research. Jaguar XJR supercharged I6 320hp 378tq and 21mpg sounds pretty good. Rare as hens teeth?

The multiplicity of computers and sensor inputs from undesirable areas (ABS, or anything else the '78 doesn't have) would definitely rule out some engines.

Never have liked convertibles, but thanks for the tip.
I would recommend going with a proven combination like Johns Cars. They have the most complete kit AFIK. You can also look at Suncoast conversions as well. A bit cheaper, but less complete. The Jaguar XJR6 would be fairly difficult as sorting out the electronics in the engine and transmission is not for the faint-hearted. Jaguar World had an article about two or so years ago about someone trying it. He got the engine in after some wrangling, but I don't think he ever got the electronics done. I think he ran out of money and time and had to back-burner the project.

As mentioned earlier, getting an early model XK8/R would be cheaper, but it seems you are intent on keeping the XJS.
 
  #17  
Old 01-11-2012, 06:50 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 76
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Now drooling over 3.5L, twin turbo, 365HP, 420TQ, est 29MPG HWY in car, ecoboost V6.
 
  #18  
Old 01-11-2012, 07:36 PM
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Posts: 7,362
Received 1,231 Likes on 939 Posts
Default

YEESSS!! i hate to admit it BUT, that FORD twin turbo, Direct injection ECOBOOST is a work of art in engineering, and the best part is it works, lot of torque, great mpg, light weight, whats not to like??

OH darn, its the money part, in time they will be available in junkyards, but thats a few days down the road!

by then there will be more choices of engines.

turbo, DI inj. and smaller engines are on the way.

for myself, i'm waitng for one of those 2011 JAG XFD 2.2L DIESELS, 50mpg , 0-60 8sec, 140mph on the top end.

YUP sounds like a plan.
lotta nice stuff coming down the road.

Ron
 
  #19  
Old 01-12-2012, 06:46 AM
MustangSix's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: orlando, FL
Posts: 183
Received 41 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

A new 5.0 Ford Coyote crate motor is over $7,000 without the ECU and wiring harness- add another $1200. A 3.5 Ecoboost crate motor (if they sold one) would likely be in the $ame range. That takes those off the table for me, at least for a car like this.

There's nothing wrong with a lump as daily driver (mine actually has a small block Chevy). It's just real hard to make an economical justification for the swap. By the time you procure all the parts, pieces, and misc components, you will have spent more money than it would have cost to buy another car.

I'm actually considering a retro "anti-lump" using a 4.2 liter XK engine, triple SU's, and a five speed. I can probably get at least 250-260 hp out of it, similar to the XKE ratings. It wouldn't be as fast, but it would be interesting. It would be all Jag,and it would sound pretty cool too.
 

Last edited by MustangSix; 01-12-2012 at 06:49 AM.
  #20  
Old 01-14-2012, 08:14 AM
derherr65's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 76
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

John of johnscars says "my kits end with the 97 LT1 - vortec old style yes - new alloy LS = NO, they do not fit well"
 


Quick Reply: Daily driver lump?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 AM.