XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

HE vs flathead and acceptance of boost pressure.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 12:08 PM
  #121  
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 426
Default

Where do you intend to race this 600 horsepower V12? Why not spend the money it would cost you and buy a XKR?
Are you willing to accept the depreciation you will get when you modify it? Hopping up an engine scares 99.9% of buyers away except the one guy who wants exactly what you have. With no other buyers coming forward you will have to market the heck out of it. And be patient.
Now a former TRW or Group 44 with real history is a totally different thing. But you? A 30 year old car with no shop manual of changes you make and any assurance of future parts availability?

I happen to get real lucky when I sold my XJS with the two turbo’s. The buyer was that .1 % and I almost broke even. Much much better than I expected. Of course the 2000+ man hours I spent were lost.


 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 12:16 PM
  #122  
Ivan Hall's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 160
Likes: 29
Default

I paid $800 for the car and I have zero none nothing not a single intention to sell it. It would be cool to put the v12 in the xkr, but I like my 4 door. I'll race it everywhere but the City, racing in town is immoral. Let's hope I can do a few good pulls in it much less put it up against another car.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 12:56 PM
  #123  
Jagboi64's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,251
Likes: 3,511
From: Calgary, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Ivan Hall
. I'll run a knock sensor and not go too hard on lower octane.
Don't forget that every engine has a unique frequency response where knock occurs, so the knock sensing system has to be designed for each engine. There is no such thing as a universal knock sensor system.

First you'd have to find the knock point by measuring the instantaneous angular acceleration of the crankshaft and then determining what the resonant frequency is at that point. It takes a lot of sophisticated measuring equipment to find knock. Since there hasn't been a Jaguar V12 with a knock sensing system you have a lot of work ahead of you and a lot of dyno time.

If all you want is more power it's much easier to simply increase the displacement.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 01:02 PM
  #124  
Ivan Hall's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 160
Likes: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Jagboi64
Don't forget that every engine has a unique frequency response where knock occurs, so the knock sensing system has to be designed for each engine. There is no such thing as a universal knock sensor system.

First you'd have to find the knock point by measuring the instantaneous angular acceleration of the crankshaft and then determining what the resonant frequency is at that point. It takes a lot of sophisticated measuring equipment to find knock. Since there hasn't been a Jaguar V12 with a knock sensing system you have a lot of work ahead of you and a lot of dyno time.

If all you want is more power it's much easier to simply increase the displacement.
You're making it too hard, yes there is a universal knock sensing system, it does take a simple adjustment. And increasing displacement may increase torque but it doesn't make a whole lot more power, and torque doesn't win races.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 04:14 PM
  #125  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

Ivan dont tell Carroll SHELBY that , one of his famous sayings " TORQUE WINS RACES HP SELLS CARS".
for street racin i'll take torque anytime!
for instance just say you got a nice clean street sedan, without an engine?
you have available TWO engines , one makes 400HP with 450 Torque, at 4000rpm 5L V8!
other is a F1(Formula one) engine, it makes 850 HP but only 200 Ft. lb.at 10,000 rpm!
?? choose carefully?
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 04:16 PM
  #126  
Ivan Hall's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 160
Likes: 29
Default

With both properly geared, the f1 motor powered car will win. Need more explanation?
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 04:20 PM
  #127  
Jagboi64's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,251
Likes: 3,511
From: Calgary, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Ivan Hall
And increasing displacement may increase torque but it doesn't make a whole lot more power, and torque doesn't win races.
Actually, it does increase power, quite favourably. However, I'm just going off Jaguar's in-house dyno runs, and they clearly know less than you do.

But you're right, torque doesn't win races, reliability does.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 04:43 PM
  #128  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

ivan you are wrong,
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 04:58 PM
  #129  
Ivan Hall's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 160
Likes: 29
Default

Lol, I knew my claim that increasing displacement doesn't increase power a lot would get some reactions, but I like seeing my hp wins races claim go uncontested, I would love someone to prove me wrong. IDK what I'm talking about but stroking a 350 to a 383 picks up 20hp and that's so much, and going to 400ci only gains another 10hp. It has to breathe through the heads, and going with anymore displacement with a he head is not worth it unless it's flowing more.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2020 | 11:40 PM
  #130  
xalty's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1,222
Default

Torque x RPM /5252



the most usable hp wins races, period
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2020 | 06:54 AM
  #131  
Ivan Hall's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 160
Likes: 29
Default

Originally Posted by xalty
Torque x RPM /5252



the most usable hp wins races, period
Thank you!!! It's a combo lol. In life, not everything is black and white, in racing, nothing is black or white, so much depth to every subject.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2020 | 04:00 PM
  #132  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

Originally Posted by xalty
Torque x RPM /5252



the most usable hp wins races, period
!
you say USABLE HP,
explain how some good racing diesels cant even rev to 5252, and can make 1000ft lbs, at 4000rpm?
i seen it race at Road America , and it beat all comers, including Billion dollar PENSKE factory Porsches, revin11,000revs!
TDI R10 on the straights walked right on past Porsche, Audi rev 4500rpm , and Porsche screamin 11,000K!
torque sure as hell won those races!
which brings to question , Reality is completely different than Theory, theory is lots of talk and BS,+ plus a bunch of numbers , reality is doing it and getting something done?

they had the engine banned from any other competition , after the race, no one knew why except Penske was on director board!



this engine in a GYP prototype won Le Mans ,

 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2020 | 04:15 PM
  #133  
Ivan Hall's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 160
Likes: 29
Default

What was the power and weight of those Porsches? The r10 had a better power to weight ratio.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2020 | 06:37 PM
  #134  
xalty's Avatar
Veteran Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1,222
Default

The V12 Tdi actually did make it to the Q7.

They even tried it in the R8. It made 500hp and gorilla torque but still slower than the tiny 400hp 4.2 V8. Usable HP and gearing wins again...
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2020 | 10:44 AM
  #135  
Ivan Hall's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 160
Likes: 29
Default

Well, update on plans, turbocharging is a long ways away, since I'm looking for stupid numbers like 800hp with lower octane fuel, I'm going to have to increase the flow as much as possible. Also, I want my car to stop a bit better, and turn a bit better, and I want to go fast right now so I'll be putting some energy into my dodge to do a 16v hybrid, that car is soooo much easier to mod lol, have ridiculously low power to weight ratios are obtained cheaply, but it's fwd but hey at least I have it. Since I want to make some power on just motor, going to see what can be done with cams, port work without touching the chamber, and ported intakes. If I can make reasonable gains in flow it will all be so much easier to boost due to lower pressures. Maybe start a fresh thread on porting he heads?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2020 | 02:33 PM
  #136  
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 14,589
Likes: 10,784
From: France
Default

Originally Posted by Ivan Hall
Since I want to make some power on just motor, going to see what can be done with cams, port work without touching the chamber, and ported intakes. If I can make reasonable gains in flow it will all be so much easier to boost due to lower pressures. Maybe start a fresh thread on porting he heads?
Ivan
I admire your can-do approach and I am sure you will have a great deal of fun doing whatever you finally decide on. I seem to remember you have an HE motor? If so (and please do not think I am being difficult or in any way accusing you of dreaming, wanting to put your ideas down, etc etc) in my view porting the HE head is a complete and utter waste of time and will gain you hardly anything. The reason being the valve size is very limited and that dimension is the limiting factor on cylinder filling. Also the tracts in the head are VERY narrow walled and it is easy to break through into the water jacket.
You do have a few other options though:
  • fitting a 6 litre head on a 5.3 motor reduces the compression ratio quite a bit and thus makes forced induction easier
  • finding a pre-HE motor might not be that hard, and these are FAR easier to (i) stroke i vastly enlarge capacity and (ii) improve cylinder filling using larger valves, and (iii) use relatively low compression cylinders and thus will take boost far more easily.
The TWR racing XJS used the pre HE motor (never mind what the label said on the boot!) admittedly they were stuck at factory capacity by the rules; but even with everything they could do the improve the breathing, including special valves pistons, etc etc, they had a really hard time getting the pre HE to 400 BHP.

For my money, I am quoting the great Roger Bywater of AJ6 engineering fame who knows more about the Jaguar V12 that probably anyone outside of Allan Scott the TWR engine guru: a 7 litre, two valve, pre HE is easily the best and cheapest way to make big power!

Anyway, go for whatever you decide on say I and have fun doing it!
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2020 | 08:05 PM
  #137  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

check out , on this forum, (has anyone made 500hp with Jag V12 pre-he?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2020 | 09:13 PM
  #138  
Jagboi64's Avatar
Veteran Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,251
Likes: 3,511
From: Calgary, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by ronbros
(has anyone made 500hp with Jag V12 pre-he?
TWR did at the end of their involvement with Group A racing, they made 510 HP at 7300 RPM. but that was after about 4 years of development. Obviously, lots of non standard parts too. They didn't start from the production engine, either, they used the Broadspeed race cars as a starting point for development.

Broadspeed had potentially cracked the 500hp barrier in 1976/77, although they generally figured they produced 450-480 hp; but those engines had completely redesigned heads and pistons, plus larger displacement. It was a unique combustion chamber design for those 2 cars. So it's pre HE in the sense it was made before the HE engine, but it was not a flat head V12 like in a production car.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2020 | 09:59 AM
  #139  
Ivan Hall's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 160
Likes: 29
Default

Well ****, I guess I won't hit my goals on pump gas without a pre he motor. I guess I could live with 600hp, then if I wanted to do some more I could just do a race fuel tune or e85, problem with that is e85 can sometimes make 1.5x the amount of power that was made on pump, scary huh? And besides, the way I drive my cars, I see myself finding the weak point shortly, I'm pretty good at blowing stuff out. This thread was very helpful, really it was, making me realize he heads move no air, and that few have turboed their he cars and seems like they have survived.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2020 | 12:07 PM
  #140  
ronbros's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 1,241
From: Austin tx and Daytona FL.
Default

Originally Posted by Jagboi64
TWR did at the end of their involvement with Group A racing, they made 510 HP at 7300 RPM. but that was after about 4 years of development. Obviously, lots of non standard parts too. They didn't start from the production engine, either, they used the Broadspeed race cars as a starting point for development.

Broadspeed had potentially cracked the 500hp barrier in 1976/77, although they generally figured they produced 450-480 hp; but those engines had completely redesigned heads and pistons, plus larger displacement. It was a unique combustion chamber design for those 2 cars. So it's pre HE in the sense it was made before the HE engine, but it was not a flat head V12 like in a production car.
Jagboi,, you should mention the amount of money spent to get 500+ HP, using 5.3L , i doubt anyone on this site has the funds or will to make it happen!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.